These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3368680)

  • 1. Descriptive statistical analyses of serial dilution data.
    Hamilton MA; Rinaldi MG
    Stat Med; 1988 Apr; 7(4):535-44. PubMed ID: 3368680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysing antibody response based on data obtained from serial dilution methods.
    Chan LS; Overturf GD; Selzer J
    Stat Med; 1983; 2(4):447-54. PubMed ID: 6369473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Threshold-free estimation of functional antibody titers of a group B streptococcus opsonophagocytic killing assay.
    Moraschini L; Passalacqua I; Fabbrini M; Margarit Y Ros I; Rigat F
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(3):189-97. PubMed ID: 25689055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study of variation in the indirect hemagglutination antibody test for toxoplasmosis.
    Caruana LB
    Am J Med Technol; 1980 Jun; 46(6):386-91. PubMed ID: 7386515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of minimum inhibitory concentration values determined by three antimicrobic dilution methods for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Woolfrey BF; Fox JM; Quall CO
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1981 Jan; 75(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 6779623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multicenter comparison of the ISO standard 20776-1 and the serial 2-fold dilution procedures to dilute hydrophilic and hydrophobic antifungal agents for susceptibility testing.
    Gomez-Lopez A; Arendrup MC; Lass-Floerl C; Rodriguez-Tudela JL; Cuenca-Estrella M
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 May; 48(5):1918-20. PubMed ID: 20220174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods for Acinetobacter spp.
    Veeraraghavan B; Vijayakumar S; Pragasam AK; Bakthavachalam YD; Prakash JAJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1946():23-37. PubMed ID: 30798541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multicategory interpretive reporting of susceptibility testing with selected antimicrobial concentrations. Ten years of laboratory and clinical experience.
    Gill VJ; Witebsky FG; MacLowry JD
    Clin Lab Med; 1989 Jun; 9(2):221-38. PubMed ID: 2659242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical criteria to establish optimal antibody dilution in flow cytometry analysis.
    Collino CJ; Jaldin-Fincati JR; Chiabrando GA
    Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2007 May; 72(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 17420983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in vancomycin MIC among MRSA isolates by agar dilution and E test method.
    Tandel K; Praharaj AK; Kumar S
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2012; 30(4):453-5. PubMed ID: 23183472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Drug susceptibility testing by dilution methods.
    Jeannot K; Plésiat P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1149():49-58. PubMed ID: 24818896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of agar dilution, microtitre broth dilution and tube macrodilution susceptibility testing of ciprofloxacin against several pathogens at two different inocula.
    Gombert ME; Aulicino TM
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1985 Dec; 16(6):709-12. PubMed ID: 2936705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic Antibiotic Susceptibility Test via a 3D Microfluidic Culture Device.
    Hou Z; An Y; Wu Z
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1572():365-377. PubMed ID: 28299700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A statistical test for classification, with applications to the characterization of pathogens according to antibiotic susceptibility patterns.
    Grimson RC; Chavigny KH
    Biometrics; 1981 Dec; 37(4):753-61. PubMed ID: 6802197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Susceptibility testing of anaerobes (author's transl)].
    Werner H
    Immun Infekt; 1978 Dec; 6(6):253-9. PubMed ID: 365718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of radioimmunoassay for antithyroglobulin autoantibodies].
    Lourme J; Dessaint JP; Capron A
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1985 Sep; 33(7):735-40. PubMed ID: 3909070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistics in ophthalmology revisited: the (effect) size matters.
    Grzybowski A; Mianowany M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e885-e888. PubMed ID: 30187631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Bacteriological sensitivity "in vitro" and therapeutic response (author's transl)].
    Lamanna A; Periti P
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1979 Jun; 15 Suppl 1():377-85. PubMed ID: 555523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation method for serial dilution experiments.
    Ben-David A; Davidson CE
    J Microbiol Methods; 2014 Dec; 107():214-21. PubMed ID: 25205541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of pH, inoculum size, and incubation time on the susceptibility of Ureaplasma urealyticum to erythromycin in vitro.
    Kenny GE; Cartwright FD
    Clin Infect Dis; 1993 Aug; 17 Suppl 1():S215-8. PubMed ID: 8399919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.