These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3368680)

  • 21. Standardisation and comparison of serial dilution and single dilution enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using different antigenic preparations of the Babesia (Theileria) equi parasite.
    Kumar S; Kumar Y; Malhotra DV; Dhar S; Nichani AK
    Vet Res; 2003; 34(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 12588685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the E test in testing susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to tobramycin.
    Rautelin H; Renkonen I; Renkonen OV
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Feb; 11(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 1396734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Studies on the disc method for the determination of bacterial sensitivity to ribostamycin (author's transl)].
    Kanazawa Y; Kuramata T
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1976 Aug; 29(8):725-30. PubMed ID: 957521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Laboratory tests used to guide antimicrobial therapy.
    Rosenblatt JE
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1987 Sep; 62(9):799-805. PubMed ID: 3626629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Mycobacterium marinum determined by E-test and agar dilution.
    Werngren J; Olsson-Liljequist B; Gezelius L; Hoffner SE
    Scand J Infect Dis; 2001; 33(8):585-8. PubMed ID: 11525351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Statistical variability of biomedical data: part 2. The influence of serial correlations on power estimates, and on comparative testing of samples.
    Sayers BM; Ruggiero C; Feuerlicht J
    Med Inform (Lond); 1981; 6(3):207-20. PubMed ID: 7289683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An improved method for determining the microbial inhibitory activity of serum and its application to the study of patients with leukemia.
    Towns ML; Bennett B; Check IJ; Hunter RL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1989 Aug; 92(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 2502906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the diagnostic utility of timed serial (slope) creatine kinase measurements with conventional serum tests in the early diagnosis of myocardial infarction.
    Leung FY; Griffith AP; Jablonsky G; Henderson AR
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1991 Jan; 28 ( Pt 1)():78-82. PubMed ID: 2024940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Antimycotic sensitivity of yeasts from the intestinal tract. Comparative studies with the serial dilution test and disk diffusion test].
    Gehse M; Blesch A; Braun KJ; Gloor M
    Fortschr Med; 1988 Jan; 106(3):47-9. PubMed ID: 3280450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A high throughput methodology for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates.
    Rampersad T; Makume M; Sobia P; Willem Sturm A
    J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Mar; 146():64-67. PubMed ID: 29410256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Evaluation of an automated procedure determining the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC). ].
    Thabaut A; Durosoir JL; Meyran M
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1982 Jun; 30(6 Pt 2):555-9. PubMed ID: 6750524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of a veterinary breakpoint minimal inhibitory concentration system and a standardized disk agar diffusion procedure for antimicrobic susceptibility testing.
    Watson CK; Cole JR; Pursell AR
    J Vet Diagn Invest; 1991 Jan; 3(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 2039791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. E-test method of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae for routine diagnostic service.
    Adeyemi-Doro FA; Lyon DJ; Ling TK; Cheng AF
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2000 Jun; 29(2):171-3. PubMed ID: 11379452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Comparison of 2 different technics in primary mycological screening: standard serial dilution tests and microtitration test].
    Raether W; Uphoff M; Staudt G
    Mykosen; 1984 Jan; 27(1):14-28. PubMed ID: 6700635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Methods for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Olsson-Liljequist B; Nord CE
    Clin Infect Dis; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 4():S293-6. PubMed ID: 8086578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Antimicrobic susceptibility testing. A personal perspective.
    Sherris JC
    Clin Lab Med; 1989 Jun; 9(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 2659240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Use of statistical methods in the rapid determination of antimicrobial susceptibilities of Escherichia coli.
    Shine PJ; Bascomb S; Gaya H; Glynn AA; Spencer RC
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1982 Jun; 9(6):433-43. PubMed ID: 7050072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of three methods of susceptibility testing of bacteroidaceae, peptococcaceae and other anaerobes to doxycycline.
    Werner H; Krasemann C; Rodermund OE; Ungerechts J; Schneider B; Wilhelm J
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1979 Sep; 244(4):525-34. PubMed ID: 543353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro comparison of disk diffusion and agar dilution antibiotic susceptibility test methods for Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
    de Castillo MC; de Saab OA; de Nader OM; de Ruiz Holgado AP
    Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz; 1998; 93(4):517-22. PubMed ID: 9711344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Correlation of agar diffusion tests and serial dilution tests. Demonstration of regression lines for gentamycin].
    Wahlig H; Hameister W; Naumann P; Linzenmeier G; Neussel H
    Int J Clin Pharmacol; 1973 Jul; 7(4):328-39. PubMed ID: 4199252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.