126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33686848)
1. Volumetric PET parameters are predictive for the prognosis of locally advanced cervical cancer.
Budak A; Budak E; Kanmaz AG; Inan AH; Tosun G; Beyan E; Aldemir OS; Ileri A
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Mar; 67(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 33686848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tumor and metastatic lymph nodes metabolic activity on
Song J; Pang W; Yi H; Ji J; Ye X; Li L
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2024 Mar; 49(3):975-984. PubMed ID: 38302763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Prognostic value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET-CT metabolic parameters in patients with advanced extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma].
Wu LL; Liang JH; Wang L; Xu W; Ding CY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 41(11):831-836. PubMed ID: 31770850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The value of metabolic parameters and textural analysis in predicting prognosis in locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.
Pedraza S; Seiffert AP; Sarandeses P; Muñoz-Lopez B; Gómez EJ; Sánchez-González P; Pérez-Regadera JF
Strahlenther Onkol; 2022 Sep; 198(9):792-801. PubMed ID: 35072751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic significance of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in patients with advanced cervical carcinoma.
Calles-Sastre L; Mucientes-Rasilla J; San-Frutos Llorente LM; Royuela A; Garcia-Espantaleón Navas M; Herrero Gámiz S; Pérez-Medina T
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2019; 38(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 30366731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The predictive recurrence value of MTV-s as an 18F-FDG PET/CT index in patients with IIB-IVA cervical cancer.
Deng C; Ding D; Wang M
Postgrad Med; 2021 May; 133(4):436-443. PubMed ID: 33620285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation study on 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic characteristics of primary lesion with clinical stage in lung cancer.
Hu WD; Wang HC; Wang YB; Cui LL; Chen XH
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jun; 65(2):172-177. PubMed ID: 30916535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic value of whole-body total lesion glycolysis at pretreatment FDG PET/CT in non-small cell lung cancer.
Chen HH; Chiu NT; Su WC; Guo HR; Lee BF
Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 22692034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Liao S; Penney BC; Wroblewski K; Zhang H; Simon CA; Kampalath R; Shih MC; Shimada N; Chen S; Salgia R; Appelbaum DE; Suzuki K; Chen CT; Pu Y
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Jan; 39(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 21946983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term outcomes of cervical cancer patients with complete metabolic response after definitive chemoradiotherapy.
Onal C; Guler OC; Reyhan M; Yapar AF
J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Sep; 32(5):e74. PubMed ID: 34378362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Volumetric PET parameters can predict overall survival in advanced lung adenocarcinoma.
Yanarateş A; Yazici B
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2020; 39(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 31818695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic Value of the Sum of Metabolic Tumor Volume of Primary Tumor and Lymph Nodes Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients With Cervical Cancer.
Hong JH; Min KJ; Lee JK; So KA; Jung US; Kim S; Eo JS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Mar; 95(9):e2992. PubMed ID: 26945420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. FDG PET/CT metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis predict prognosis in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma.
Chung HW; Lee KY; Kim HJ; Kim WS; So Y
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2014 Jan; 140(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 24194352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined pre-treatment MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters as prognostic biomarkers in patients with cervical cancer.
Miccò M; Vargas HA; Burger IA; Kollmeier MA; Goldman DA; Park KJ; Abu-Rustum NR; Hricak H; Sala E
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1169-1176. PubMed ID: 24767630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Confirmation of the prognostic value of pretherapeutic tumor SUR and MTV in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Hofheinz F; Li Y; Steffen IG; Lin Q; Lili C; Hua W; van den Hoff J; Zschaeck S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jul; 46(7):1485-1494. PubMed ID: 30949816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Texture analysis of
Nakajo M; Jinguji M; Nakabeppu Y; Nakajo M; Higashi R; Fukukura Y; Sasaki K; Uchikado Y; Natsugoe S; Yoshiura T
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Feb; 44(2):206-214. PubMed ID: 27613542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Prognostic value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET-CT for patients with advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].
Ding CY; Guo Z; Sun J; Yang WP; Li TR
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 40(7):528-533. PubMed ID: 30060362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic Value of Metabolic Parameters of Metastatic Lymph Nodes on
Jin F; Qu B; Fu Z; Zhang Y; Han A; Kong L; Yu J
Clin Lung Cancer; 2018 Jan; 19(1):e101-e108. PubMed ID: 28690012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PET/MRI in Cervical Cancer: Associations Between Imaging Biomarkers and Tumor Stage, Disease Progression, and Overall Survival.
Shih IL; Yen RF; Chen CA; Cheng WF; Chen BB; Chang YH; Cheng MF; Shih TT
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jan; 53(1):305-318. PubMed ID: 32798280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
