These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33687318)

  • 1. Effects of overground surfaces on running kinematics and kinetics in habitual non-rearfoot strikers.
    Zhou W; Lai Z; Mo S; Wang L
    J Sports Sci; 2021 Aug; 39(16):1822-1829. PubMed ID: 33687318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surface effects on kinematics, kinetics and stiffness of habitual rearfoot strikers during running.
    Zhou W; Yin L; Jiang J; Zhang Y; Hsiao CP; Chen Y; Mo S; Wang L
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0283323. PubMed ID: 36947495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lower extremity stiffness in habitual forefoot strikers during running on different overground surfaces.
    Zeng Z; Yin L; Zhou W; Zhang YU; Jiang J; Wang L
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2021; 23(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 34846369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical factors affecting the foot eversion moment during the stance phase of running in non-rearfoot strikers.
    Tsujimoto N; Nunome H; Mizuno T; Inoue K; Matsui K; Matsugi R; Ikegami Y
    Sports Biomech; 2021 Apr; 20(3):290-303. PubMed ID: 30693850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Joint kinematics and ground reaction forces in overground versus treadmill graded running.
    Firminger CR; Vernillo G; Savoldelli A; Stefanyshyn DJ; Millet GY; Edwards WB
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():109-113. PubMed ID: 29729612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forefoot strikers exhibit lower running-induced knee loading than rearfoot strikers.
    Kulmala JP; Avela J; Pasanen K; Parkkari J
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Dec; 45(12):2306-13. PubMed ID: 23748735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attenuation of foot pressure during running on four different surfaces: asphalt, concrete, rubber, and natural grass.
    Tessutti V; Ribeiro AP; Trombini-Souza F; Sacco IC
    J Sports Sci; 2012; 30(14):1545-50. PubMed ID: 22897427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of habitual foot-strike pattern on the gastrocnemius medialis muscle-tendon interaction and muscle force production during running.
    Swinnen W; Hoogkamer W; Delabastita T; Aeles J; De Groote F; Vanwanseele B
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2019 Mar; 126(3):708-716. PubMed ID: 30629477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of plantar loads during running on different overground surfaces.
    Wang L; Hong Y; Li JX; Zhou JH
    Res Sports Med; 2012 Apr; 20(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 22458825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rearfoot and midfoot or forefoot impacts in habitually shod runners.
    Boyer ER; Rooney BD; Derrick TR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Jul; 46(7):1384-91. PubMed ID: 24300124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Joint contact loading in forefoot and rearfoot strike patterns during running.
    Rooney BD; Derrick TR
    J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(13):2201-6. PubMed ID: 23910541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Redistribution of Mechanical Work at the Knee and Ankle Joints During Fast Running in Minimalist Shoes.
    Fuller JT; Buckley JD; Tsiros MD; Brown NA; Thewlis D
    J Athl Train; 2016 Oct; 51(10):806-812. PubMed ID: 27834504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Between-Limb Differences in Patellofemoral Joint Forces During Running at 12 to 24 Months After Unilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Sritharan P; Schache AG; Culvenor AG; Perraton LG; Bryant AL; Crossley KM
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Jun; 48(7):1711-1719. PubMed ID: 32374673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incorporating subject-specific geometry to compare metatarsal stress during running with different foot strike patterns.
    Ellison MA; Kenny M; Fulford J; Javadi A; Rice HM
    J Biomech; 2020 May; 105():109792. PubMed ID: 32327192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of negative joint work and vertical ground reaction force loading rates in Chi runners and rearfoot-striking runners.
    Goss DL; Gross MT
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2013 Oct; 43(10):685-92. PubMed ID: 24256170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In-shoe loading in rearfoot and non-rearfoot strikers during running using minimalist footwear.
    Kernozek TW; Meardon S; Vannatta CN
    Int J Sports Med; 2014 Dec; 35(13):1112-7. PubMed ID: 24977946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical Differences of Foot-Strike Patterns During Running: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.
    Almeida MO; Davis IS; Lopes AD
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2015 Oct; 45(10):738-55. PubMed ID: 26304644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do non-rearfoot runners experience greater second metatarsal stresses than rearfoot runners?
    Ellison MA; Fulford J; Javadi A; Rice HM
    J Biomech; 2021 Sep; 126():110647. PubMed ID: 34343863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparisons of increases in knee and ankle joint moments following an increase in running speed from 8 to 12 to 16km·h(-1.).
    Petersen J; Nielsen RO; Rasmussen S; Sørensen H
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Nov; 29(9):959-64. PubMed ID: 25242200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A kinematics and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill running.
    Riley PO; Dicharry J; Franz J; Della Croce U; Wilder RP; Kerrigan DC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2008 Jun; 40(6):1093-100. PubMed ID: 18460996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.