240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33687720)
1. Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics for Analysis of Hydrophilic Phosphopeptides.
Tsai CF; Smith JS; Eiger DS; Martin K; Liu T; Smith RD; Shi T; Rajagopal S; Jacobs JM
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2259():247-257. PubMed ID: 33687720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tandem Mass Tag Labeling Facilitates Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Hydrophilic Phosphopeptides.
Tsai CF; Smith JS; Krajewski K; Zhao R; Moghieb AM; Nicora CD; Xiong X; Moore RJ; Liu T; Smith RD; Jacobs JM; Rajagopal S; Shi T
Anal Chem; 2019 Sep; 91(18):11606-11613. PubMed ID: 31418558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of different fractionation strategies for in-depth phosphoproteomics by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Yeh TT; Ho MY; Chen WY; Hsu YC; Ku WC; Tseng HW; Chen ST; Chen SF
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2019 Jun; 411(15):3417-3424. PubMed ID: 31011783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiplexed quantitative phosphoproteomics of cell line and tissue samples.
Kreuzer J; Edwards A; Haas W
Methods Enzymol; 2019; 626():41-65. PubMed ID: 31606085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Macroporous reversed-phase separation of proteins combined with reversed-phase separation of phosphopeptides and tandem mass spectrometry for profiling the phosphoproteome of MDA-MB-231 cells.
Ye X; Li L
Electrophoresis; 2014 Dec; 35(24):3479-86. PubMed ID: 24888630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Off-line high-pH reversed-phase fractionation for in-depth phosphoproteomics.
Batth TS; Francavilla C; Olsen JV
J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):6176-86. PubMed ID: 25338131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Highly sensitive phosphoproteomics by tailoring solid-phase extraction to electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography.
Loroch S; Zahedi RP; Sickmann A
Anal Chem; 2015 Feb; 87(3):1596-604. PubMed ID: 25405705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Capillary Zone Electrophoresis-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Large-Scale Phosphoproteomics with the Production of over 11,000 Phosphopeptides from the Colon Carcinoma HCT116 Cell Line.
Chen D; Ludwig KR; Krokhin OV; Spicer V; Yang Z; Shen X; Hummon AB; Sun L
Anal Chem; 2019 Feb; 91(3):2201-2208. PubMed ID: 30624053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tandem Mass Tag-Based Phosphoproteomics in Plants.
Vélez-Bermúdez IC; Jain D; Ravindran A; Chen CW; Hsu CC; Schmidt W
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2581():309-319. PubMed ID: 36413327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and application of a phosphoproteomic method using electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC), IMAC, and LC-MS/MS analysis to study Marek's Disease Virus infection.
Chien KY; Liu HC; Goshe MB
J Proteome Res; 2011 Sep; 10(9):4041-53. PubMed ID: 21736374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sample Preparation for Relative Quantitation of Proteins Using Tandem Mass Tags (TMT) and Mass Spectrometry (MS).
Erdjument-Bromage H; Huang FK; Neubert TA
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1741():135-149. PubMed ID: 29392697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Isotope-labeling and affinity enrichment of phosphopeptides for proteomic analysis using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Kota U; Chien KY; Goshe MB
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 564():303-21. PubMed ID: 19544030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous quantification of protein phosphorylation sites using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomics: a linear algebra approach for isobaric phosphopeptides.
Xu F; Yang T; Sheng Y; Zhong T; Yang M; Chen Y
J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):5452-60. PubMed ID: 25403019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nanoscale Solid-Phase Isobaric Labeling for Multiplexed Quantitative Phosphoproteomics.
Ogata K; Tsai CF; Ishihama Y
J Proteome Res; 2021 Aug; 20(8):4193-4202. PubMed ID: 34292731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phosphopeptide Enrichment and LC-MS/MS Analysis to Study the Phosphoproteome of Recombinant Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells.
Henry M; Coleman O; Prashant ; Clynes M; Meleady P
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1603():195-208. PubMed ID: 28493132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid Shotgun Phosphoproteomics Analysis.
Carrera M; Cañas B; Lopez-Ferrer D
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2259():259-268. PubMed ID: 33687721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic Optimization of Automated Phosphopeptide Enrichment for High-Sensitivity Phosphoproteomics.
Bortel P; Piga I; Koenig C; Gerner C; Martinez-Val A; Olsen JV
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2024 May; 23(5):100754. PubMed ID: 38548019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fractionation of Enriched Phosphopeptides Using pH/Acetonitrile-Gradient-Reversed-Phase Microcolumn Separation in Combination with LC-MS/MS Analysis.
Ondrej M; Rehulka P; Rehulkova H; Kupcik R; Tichy A
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Jun; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 32492839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phosphopeptide Enrichment Coupled with Label-free Quantitative Mass Spectrometry to Investigate the Phosphoproteome in Prostate Cancer.
Cheng LC; Li Z; Graeber TG; Graham NA; Drake JM
J Vis Exp; 2018 Aug; (138):. PubMed ID: 30124664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deep Profiling of Proteome and Phosphoproteome by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, and Mass Spectrometry.
Bai B; Tan H; Pagala VR; High AA; Ichhaporia VP; Hendershot L; Peng J
Methods Enzymol; 2017; 585():377-395. PubMed ID: 28109439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
