121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33689633)
1. Instant vision assessment device for measuring refraction in low vision.
Cheng D; Woo GC
Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Sep; 104(7):780-787. PubMed ID: 33689633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of the Topcon BV-1000 automated subjective refraction system.
Dave T; Fukuma Y
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 May; 81(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 15181357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Self-assessment of refractive errors using a simple optical approach.
Leube A; Kraft C; Ohlendorf A; Wahl S
Clin Exp Optom; 2018 May; 101(3):386-391. PubMed ID: 29356102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of an Affordable Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
Rubio M; Hernández CS; Seco E; Perez-Merino P; Casares I; Dave SR; Lim D; Durr NJ; Lage E
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):726-732. PubMed ID: 31592955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Agreement and variability of subjective refraction, autorefraction, and wavefront aberrometry in pseudophakic patients.
Ruiss M; Findl O; Draschl P; Harrer-Seely A; Hirnschall N
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1056-1063. PubMed ID: 34292891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Evaluation Of a 0.05 D-step Binocular Wavefront Optometer in Young Adults in China.
Cheng M; Chen X; Lei Y; Li B; Jiang Y; Xu Y; Zhou X; Wang X
Clin Exp Optom; 2024 May; 107(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 36794379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study.
Stoor K; Karvonen E; Liinamaa J; Saarela V
Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29193822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of spherical equivalent refraction and astigmatism measured with three different models of autorefractors.
Gwiazda J; Weber C
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jan; 81(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 14747762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study.
Rao DP; Negiloni K; Gurunathan S; Velkumar S; Sivaraman A; Baig AU; Kumari B; Murali K
BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):498. PubMed ID: 36536321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Self-refraction accuracy with adjustable spectacles among children in Ghana.
Ilechie AA; Abokyi S; Owusu-Ansah A; Boadi-Kusi SB; Denkyira AK; Abraham CH
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Apr; 92(4):456-63. PubMed ID: 25785535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Design and Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
Durr NJ; Dave SR; Vera-Diaz FA; Lim D; Dorronsoro C; Marcos S; Thorn F; Lage E
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1140-7. PubMed ID: 26580271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ametropia detection using a novel, compact wavefront autorefractor.
Hernández CS; Gil A; Zaytouny A; Casares I; Poderoso J; de Lara A; Wehse A; Dave SR; Lim D; Lage E; Alejandre-Alba N
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Mar; 44(2):311-320. PubMed ID: 38084770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Comparison of High-resolution and Standard Refractions and Prescriptions.
Meyer D; Rickert M; Reed O; Joret P; Kollbaum P
Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Nov; 100(11):751-760. PubMed ID: 37861987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and reproducibility of a handheld videorefractor.
Ogbuehi KC; Almaliki WH; AlQarni A; Osuagwu UL
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):632-41. PubMed ID: 25822015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction?
Hastings GD; Marsack JD; Nguyen LC; Cheng H; Applegate RA
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):317-325. PubMed ID: 28370389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of a Novel Binocular Refraction System with Standard Digital Phoropter Refraction.
Bossie T; Reilly J; Vera-Diaz FA
Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Jul; 100(7):451-458. PubMed ID: 37369097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of a low-cost, portable, refractive error estimation device: Results of a diagnostic accuracy trial.
Joseph S; Sundar B; Rashme VL; Venkatachalam S; Ehrlich JR; Ravilla T
PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272451. PubMed ID: 35921350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Visual Acuity and Refractive Error Using OPDIII and Subjective Findings in Visually Normal Subjects.
Alamdar M; Jafarzadehpur E; Mirzajani A; Yekta AA; Khabazkhoob M
Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Nov; 44 Suppl 2():S302-S306. PubMed ID: 30379733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
