These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33690327)

  • 1. Joint estimation of self-mixing interferometry parameters and displacement reconstruction based on local normalization.
    Kim JH; Kim CH; Yun TH; Hong HS; Ho KM; Kim KH
    Appl Opt; 2021 Mar; 60(8):2282-2287. PubMed ID: 33690327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Normalization-free displacement reconstruction method based on fringe scaling.
    Hong HS; Kim CH; Kim JH; Kim CH; Ri CR
    Appl Opt; 2022 Mar; 61(7):1600-1605. PubMed ID: 35297833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toward an Estimation of the Optical Feedback Factor
    Bernal OD; Zabit U; Jayat F; Bosch T
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(10):. PubMed ID: 34069430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fast estimation method of feedback factor based on the derivative of the self-mixing signal.
    Kim JH; Kim CH; Kim DK; Ri HS; Jo GH
    Appl Opt; 2020 Aug; 59(22):6689-6693. PubMed ID: 32749373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation method for the optical feedback factor and linewidth enhancement factor using phase discontinuities in self-mixing interferometry signals.
    Ri CY; Kim CS; Ri GC; Kang JC; Pak CM; O JM
    Appl Opt; 2020 Jan; 59(3):687-693. PubMed ID: 32225204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fringe Detection and Displacement Sensing for Variable Optical Feedback-Based Self-Mixing Interferometry by Using Deep Neural Networks.
    Siddiqui AA; Zabit U; Bernal OD
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vibration reconstruction and optical feedback parameter evaluation based on the direction discrimination in self-mixing interferometry.
    Ri CY; Choe JH; Ri HR; Pak CM; Ri KR; O JM
    Appl Opt; 2021 May; 60(13):3801-3807. PubMed ID: 33983315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring parameters of laser self-mixing interferometry sensor based on back propagation neural network.
    An L; Liu B
    Opt Express; 2022 May; 30(11):19134-19144. PubMed ID: 36221698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the measurement performance for a self-mixing interferometry-based displacement sensing system.
    Fan Y; Yu Y; Xi J; Chicharo JF
    Appl Opt; 2011 Sep; 50(26):5064-72. PubMed ID: 21946986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Classification of laser self-mixing interferometric signal under moderate feedback.
    Bernal OD; Zabit U; Bosch T
    Appl Opt; 2014 Feb; 53(4):702-8. PubMed ID: 24514187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speckle-insensitive fringe detection method based on Hilbert transform for self-mixing interferometry.
    Arriaga AL; Bony F; Bosch T
    Appl Opt; 2014 Oct; 53(30):6954-62. PubMed ID: 25402781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detectorless measurements of the operational linewidth of NIR VCSELs by self-mixing interferometry.
    Cardilli MC; Dabbicco M
    Appl Opt; 2016 Nov; 55(31):8946-8950. PubMed ID: 27828300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Equivalent wavelength self-mixing interferometry for displacement measurement.
    Huang Z; Li C; Li S; Li D
    Appl Opt; 2016 Sep; 55(25):7120-5. PubMed ID: 27607290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extraction of vibration parameters from optical feedback interferometry signals using wavelets.
    Jha A; Azcona FJ; Yañez C; Royo S
    Appl Opt; 2015 Dec; 54(34):10106-13. PubMed ID: 26836667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simultaneous measurement of vibration and parameters of a semiconductor laser using self-mixing interferometry.
    Gao Y; Yu Y; Xi J; Guo Q
    Appl Opt; 2014 Jul; 53(19):4256-63. PubMed ID: 25089988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring Linewidth Enhancement Factor by Relaxation Oscillation Frequency in a Laser with Optical Feedback.
    Ruan Y; Liu B; Yu Y; Xi J; Guo Q; Tong J
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Nov; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 30453577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Corrections to the displacement estimation based on analytic minimization of adaptive regularized cost functions for ultrasound elastography.
    Peng B; Lai J; Wang L; Liu DC
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2801-10. PubMed ID: 25226985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement of micro-harmonic vibration from optical feedback interferometry using wavelet trend analysis.
    Bhardwaj VK; Maini S
    Opt Commun; 2020 Dec; 476():126330. PubMed ID: 32834124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laser feedback interferometry in multi-mode terahertz quantum cascade lasers.
    Qi X; Agnew G; Taimre T; Han S; Lim YL; Bertling K; Demić A; Dean P; Indjin D; Rakić AD
    Opt Express; 2020 May; 28(10):14246-14262. PubMed ID: 32403467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental observation of differential self-mixing interference signals using a randomly polarized laser: a differential self-mixing interferometry.
    Qi P; Cheng J; Li S; Zhang Z; Song G; Weng J; Zhong J
    Opt Lett; 2020 Apr; 45(7):1858-1861. PubMed ID: 32236017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.