400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33691227)
1. Steering or braking avoidance response in SHRP2 rear-end crashes and near-crashes: A decision tree approach.
Sarkar A; Hickman JS; McDonald AD; Huang W; Vogelpohl T; Markkula G
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 May; 154():106055. PubMed ID: 33691227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of near crashes among teen, young adult, and experienced adult drivers using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study.
Seacrist T; Douglas EC; Huang E; Megariotis J; Prabahar A; Kashem A; Elzarka A; Haber L; MacKinney T; Loeb H
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S89-S96. PubMed ID: 29584473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of off-path glances: A quantitative analysis of rear-end conflicts involving Chinese professional truck drivers as the striking partners.
Pipkorn L; Bianchi Piccinini G
J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():259-266. PubMed ID: 32199571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of Driver Evasive Maneuvering Prior to Intersection Crashes Using Event Data Recorders.
Scanlon JM; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S182-9. PubMed ID: 26436230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Near crash characteristics among risky drivers using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study.
Seacrist T; Douglas EC; Hannan C; Rogers R; Belwadi A; Loeb H
J Safety Res; 2020 Jun; 73():263-269. PubMed ID: 32563402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing driver behavior using shrp2 adverse weather data.
Druta C; Kassing A; Gibbons R; Alden VA
J Safety Res; 2020 Jun; 73():283-295. PubMed ID: 32563404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computational modeling of driver pre-crash brake response, with and without off-road glances: Parameterization using real-world crashes and near-crashes.
Svärd M; Markkula G; Bärgman J; Victor T
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Dec; 163():106433. PubMed ID: 34673380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring the combined effects of driving situations on freeway rear-end crash risk using naturalistic driving study data.
Wu KK; Wang L
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105866. PubMed ID: 33276188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increase in rear-end collision risk by acute stress-induced fatigue in on-road truck driving.
Minusa S; Mizuno K; Ojiro D; Tanaka T; Kuriyama H; Yamano E; Kuratsune H; Watanabe Y
PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258892. PubMed ID: 34673839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of naturalistic driving videos of fleet services drivers to estimate driver error and potentially distracting behaviors as risk factors for rear-end versus angle crashes.
Harland KK; Carney C; McGehee D
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 26760293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of crash rates and rear-end striking crashes among novice teens and experienced adults using the SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study.
Seacrist T; Belwadi A; Prabahar A; Chamberlain S; Megariotis J; Loeb H
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():48-52. PubMed ID: 27586102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of failure-caused traffic conflicts as surrogates of rear-end collisions in naturalistic driving studies.
Tarko AP; Lizarazo CG
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105863. PubMed ID: 33189030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gender differences of young drivers on injury severity outcome of highway crashes.
Amarasingha N; Dissanayake S
J Safety Res; 2014 Jun; 49():113-20. PubMed ID: 24913475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
Gao J; Davis GA
J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Situational influences on response time and maneuver choice: Development of time-critical scenarios.
Powelleit M; Vollrath M
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jan; 122():48-62. PubMed ID: 30308330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in frequency of occurrence, event characteristics, and pre-impact vehicle kinematics between crashes, near-crashes, and single vehicle conflicts in a large-scale naturalistic driving study.
Perez MA; Sudweeks JD; Sears E; Valente J; Guo F
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(1):32-37. PubMed ID: 36548218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Driver behaviors assisted by different human machine interfaces to avoid rear-end collisions during level 2 automated driving.
Yang B; Saito T; Wang Z; Kitazaki S; Nakano K
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(6):475-481. PubMed ID: 37339499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multitasking additional-to-driving: Prevalence, structure, and associated risk in SHRP2 naturalistic driving data.
Bálint A; Flannagan CAC; Leslie A; Klauer S; Guo F; Dozza M
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 137():105455. PubMed ID: 32036106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A farewell to brake reaction times? Kinematics-dependent brake response in naturalistic rear-end emergencies.
Markkula G; Engström J; Lodin J; Bärgman J; Victor T
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):209-26. PubMed ID: 27450793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
