These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3369170)

  • 41. Admission test: a screening test for fetal distress in labor.
    Ingemarsson I; Arulkumaran S; Ingemarsson E; Tambyraja RL; Ratnam SS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Dec; 68(6):800-6. PubMed ID: 3785793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Fetal home monitoring for the prenatal management of gastroschisis.
    Salomon LJ; Mahieu-Caputo D; Jouvet P; Jouannic JM; Benachi A; Grebille AG; Dumez Y; Dommergues M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Nov; 83(11):1061-4. PubMed ID: 15488122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Diagnosis and management of intrapartum fetal distress.
    van Geijn HP; Copray FJ; Donkers DK; Bos MH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1991 Dec; 42 Suppl():S63-72. PubMed ID: 1809612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Cardiotocography admission monitoring and intermittent intrapartum monitoring for fetal distress in labour].
    Yan P
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1993 Apr; 28(4):217-9, 253. PubMed ID: 8404305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variability using the matching pursuit technique as an indicator of fetal hypoxia during labor.
    Salamalekis E; Hintipas E; Salloum I; Vasios G; Loghis C; Vitoratos N; Chrelias Ch; Creatsas G
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Mar; 19(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 16690510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Auscultation of the fetal heart presents advantages over electronic monitoring.
    Sandmire HF; DeMott RK
    Wis Med J; 1995 Dec; 94(12):661-3. PubMed ID: 8571614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The prediction and prevention of intrapartum fetal asphyxia in term pregnancies.
    Low JA; Pickersgill H; Killen H; Derrick EJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Mar; 184(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 11262479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Clinical value of remote fetal monitoring network in high-risk pregnancy].
    Qi H; Sun J; Liu J; He X; Zhang J; Qin Z
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Aug; 37(8):455-8. PubMed ID: 12411022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Intermittent Auscultation for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Surveillance (replaces ACNM Clinical Bulletin #9, March 2007).
    American College of Nurse-Midwives
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2010; 55(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 20630370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The Jordanian cesarean section rate.
    Hindawi IM; Meri ZB
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Management of abnormal fetal heart rate in the second stage of labor].
    Liu S; Liu P
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Aug; 37(8):462-4. PubMed ID: 12411024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Obligatory monitoring methods during delivery].
    Wolff F
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 1997; 201(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 9172899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Fetal ST segment heart rate analysis in labor: improvement of intervention criteria using interpolated base deficit.
    Mansano RZ; Beall MH; Ross MG
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Jan; 20(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 17437199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. How deviations from STAN guidelines contribute to operative delivery for suspected fetal distress.
    Massoud M; Bloc F; Gaucherand P; Doret M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 May; 162(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 22397749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Lowering the cesarean section rate by exclusion of cardiotocographically suspected acidosis using fetal blood gas analysis].
    Köppel R; Benz J
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1984 Sep; 44(9):573-5. PubMed ID: 6567560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. STAN, a clinical audit: the outcome of 2 years of regular use in the city of Varberg, Sweden.
    Welin AK; Norén H; Odeback A; Andersson M; Andersson G; Rosén KG
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(7):827-32. PubMed ID: 17611828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Quantitative CTG appraisal sub partu with a new CTG score: diagnostic significance of the parameters of the acid-base balance in umbilical blood?].
    Roemer VM
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2003; 207(4):121-6. PubMed ID: 14528413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Fetal monitoring sub partu in West Germany. I. Basic data].
    Roemer VM; Kieback DG; Bühler K
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1985 Mar; 45(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 3845893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Neonatal outcome after caesarean birth for fetal distress and/or meconium staining in a South African rural setting.
    van Bogaert LJ; Misra A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Jan; 28(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 18259900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.