174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3369198)
1. [Collaborative study for performing resistance tests with the agar diffusion test].
Klare I
Z Gesamte Hyg; 1988 Feb; 34(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 3369198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Interpretation of disc diffusion susceptibility tests: a comparison of methods.
Donnelly JP
Med Lab Sci; 1985 Apr; 42(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 4068927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Determination of microorganism sensitivity to antibiotics by the diffusion-in-agar method with a semiquantitative evaluation of the results obtained].
Givental' NI; Sobolev VR; Ved'mina EA; Bogdanova LF; Vorob'eva LS
Lab Delo; 1982; (1):44-8. PubMed ID: 6174790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Historical survey of tests to determine bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobial agents.
Laverdiere M; Sabath LD
Mt Sinai J Med; 1977; 44(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 321948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Antimicrobial drug therapy and microbial sensitivity tests--antibiotics and microbial sensitivity tests].
Kanno H
Rinsho Byori; 1997 Jul; Suppl 105():174-81. PubMed ID: 9379537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Methods for the rapid determination of microbial sensitivity to antibiotics].
D'iakov SI; Il'na NIu; Lebedeva IK
Antibiotiki; 1983 Jul; 28(7):545-54. PubMed ID: 6354076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Resistance testing of bacteria with firefly bioluminescence. A rapid test].
Weiss R; Krauss H
Zentralbl Veterinarmed B; 1982 Jun; 29(5):359-71. PubMed ID: 6814130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Antibiotic sensitivity test by disc diffusion method: standardization and interpretation.
Agarwal KC
Indian J Pathol Bacteriol; 1974 Jul; 17(3):149-59. PubMed ID: 4455625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the agar diffusion test. Comparison with tetracycline, chloramphenicol, gentamycin and sulfadiazine].
Lentze I
Med Klin; 1971 Nov; 66(45):1518-22. PubMed ID: 5000621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Laboratory tests for antimicrobial synergy.
Peterson E
Am J Med Technol; 1983 Nov; 49(11):775-7. PubMed ID: 6650558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Broth microdilution test for the standardized determination of minimal inhibitory and minimal bactericidal concentrations of antimicrobial drugs in rapidly growing aerobic bacteria].
Klare I; Witte W
Z Gesamte Hyg; 1988 Feb; 34(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 3369199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Susceptibility test methods which may be able to predict the emergence of resistance to newer beta- lactam antibiotics.
Jorgensen JH
Chemioterapia; 1985 Feb; 4(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 3986946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Introduction of the inoculum into the upper agar layer as an alternative method in determining microorganism sensitivity to antibiotics by diffusion in agar].
Givental' NI; Ved'mina EA; Ogneva NS; Razvykh VM; Bogdanova LF
Antibiotiki; 1984 Aug; 29(8):585-90. PubMed ID: 6486754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Determination of bacterial sensitivity to beta-lsctam antibiotics by means of filter paper discs. An attempt at standardization].
Borowski J; Dzierzanowska D; Linda H; Jakubicz P; Miksza-Zylkiewicz R; Wojnar A; Rybaczuk M
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 1977; 29(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 926895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Antibiogram Committee of the French Microbiology Society. Report 2000-2001].
Soussy CJ; Carret G; Cavallo JD; Chardon H; Chidiac C; Choutet P; Courvalin P; Dabernat H; Drugeon H; Dubreuil L; Goldstein F; Jarlier V; Leclercq R; Nicolas-Chanoine MH; Philippon A; Quentin C; Rouveix B; Sirot J
Pathol Biol (Paris); 2000 Nov; 48(9):832-71. PubMed ID: 11141919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Modification of the rapid electrochemical micromethod for resistance determination in urinary tract infections].
Stradtmann H; Schauer O
Z Med Lab Diagn; 1980; 21(4):242-3. PubMed ID: 7467688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [The resistance behavior of significant veterinary bacterial agents in the year 1992 (ranking in sequence)].
Trolldenier H
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1995 Apr; 108(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 7575380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of the results of antibiotic sensitivity tests made with the ABAC method and the agar diffusion method].
Orsi A; Simonetti T; Morgantetti F
Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1981 Mar; 17(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 7313068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Automated microbial sensitivity tests noting the difference in bacterial growth profiles--determination of the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of bacteria contaminated by drug-resistant mutant strains].
Miike H; Ebina Y; Hashimoto H; Miyaji T
Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1983 Apr; 21(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 6655991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [The reality and future of susceptibility test].
Kanno H
Rinsho Byori; 1988 Apr; 36(4):434-6. PubMed ID: 3404738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
