These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33692247)

  • 1. The effect of wearing an anti-flash hood on the noise attenuation of earmuffs.
    Paddan GS; Lower MC
    Ind Health; 2021 Sep; 59(4):204-219. PubMed ID: 33692247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic Performance of 3D Printed Nanocomposite Earmuff.
    Ahmadi S; Nassiri P; Ghasemi I; Monazzam Ep MR
    Glob J Health Sci; 2015 May; 8(1):180-8. PubMed ID: 26234977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hearing protection against high-level shooting impulses in relation to hearing damage risk criteria.
    Pekkarinen JO; Starck JP; Ylikoski JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):196-202. PubMed ID: 1737871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Earmuff performance in the presence of high-level impulse from a recoilless weapon firing in a confined space.
    Li Z; Tao G; Wen P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Jul; 156(1):359-368. PubMed ID: 38994905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Industrial impulse noise, crest factor and the effect of earmuffs.
    Pekkarinen J
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Oct; 48(10):861-6. PubMed ID: 3687731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attenuation of high-level impulses by earmuffs.
    Zera J; Mlynski R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2082-96. PubMed ID: 17902846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.
    Ravicz ME; Melcher JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):216-31. PubMed ID: 11206150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selection of Earmuffs and Other Personal Protective Equipment Used in Combination.
    Kozlowski E; Mlynski R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Apr; 16(9):. PubMed ID: 31027325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An acoustic head simulator for hearing protector evaluation. II: Measurements in steady-state and impulse noise environments.
    Giguère C; Kunov H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1197-205. PubMed ID: 2708666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A study of the real-world noise attenuation of the current hearing protection devices in typical workplaces using Field Microphone in Real Ear method.
    Aliabadi M; Biabani A; Golmohammadi R; Farhadian M
    Work; 2018; 60(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 29865097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic notch filtering earmuff utilizing Helmholtz resonator arrays.
    Mizukoshi F; Takahashi H
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258842. PubMed ID: 34665827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protection efficiency of hearing protectors against military noise from handheld weapons and vehicles.
    Pääkkönen R; Lehtomäki K
    Noise Health; 2005; 7(26):11-20. PubMed ID: 16053601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube.
    Murphy WJ; Fackler CJ; Berger EH; Shaw PB; Stergar M
    Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):364-73. PubMed ID: 26356380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amplified earmuffs: impact on speech intelligibility in industrial noise for listeners with hearing loss.
    Dolan TG; O'Loughlin D
    Am J Audiol; 2005 Jun; 14(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16180971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
    Abel SM; Odell P
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the effect of training along with fit testing on earmuff users in a Chinese textile factory.
    Liu Y; Yang M
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Jun; 15(6):518-526. PubMed ID: 29580200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of speech intelligibility measures for an electronic amplifying earmuff and an identical passive attenuation device.
    Byrne DC; Palmer CV
    Audiol Res; 2012 Jan; 2(1):e5. PubMed ID: 26557334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noise attenuation of hearing protectors against heavy weapon noise.
    Pääkkönen R; Lehtomäki K; Savolainen S; Myllyniemi J; Hämäläinen E
    Mil Med; 2000 Sep; 165(9):678-82. PubMed ID: 11011540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of coldness on the protective performance of earmuffs.
    Starck J; Toppila E; Laitinen H
    Noise Health; 2005; 7(26):47-53. PubMed ID: 16053605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spectral analysis of hearing protector impulsive insertion loss.
    Fackler CJ; Berger EH; Murphy WJ; Stergar ME
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup1):13-21. PubMed ID: 27885881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.