These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33692247)

  • 41. Earmuff efficacy in the workplace using F-MIRE - a case report.
    Gomes RF; Samelli AG; Bistafa SR
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2018 Dec; 24(4):577-581. PubMed ID: 28776454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Determining attenuation of impulse noise with an electrical equivalent of a hearing protection device.
    Młyński R; Kozłowski E
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2013; 19(1):127-41. PubMed ID: 23498707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing.
    Chiu CC; Wan TJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32384734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The Effect of Earmuffs on Physiological Parameters in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review.
    Ozdemir S; Balci S
    Curr Pediatr Rev; 2020; 16(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 32056529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Earmuff effectiveness against chainsaw noise over a 12-month period.
    Kirk P
    Appl Ergon; 1993 Aug; 24(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 15676924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The impact of hearing protection on sound localization and orienting behavior.
    Simpson BD; Bolia RS; McKinley RL; Brungart DS
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):188-98. PubMed ID: 15960096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Prevention of acute acoustic trauma by earmuffs during military training.
    Dhammadejsakdi N; Boonyanukul S; Jaruchinda S; Aramrattana A; Eiumtrakul S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Feb; 92 Suppl 1():S1-6. PubMed ID: 21302411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A controlled investigation of in-field attenuation performance of selected insert, earmuff, and canal cap hearing protectors.
    Park MY; Casali JG
    Hum Factors; 1991 Dec; 33(6):693-714. PubMed ID: 1800294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Systematic Evaluation of the Relationship between Physical and Psychoacoustical Measurements of Hearing Protectors' Attenuation.
    Nélisse H; Le Cocq C; Boutin J; Laville F; Voix J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(12):829-44. PubMed ID: 26023884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing Protection Devices Based on Microphone in Real Ear.
    Biabani A; Aliabadi M; Golmohammadi R; Farhadian M
    Saf Health Work; 2017 Dec; 8(4):364-370. PubMed ID: 29276635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Combined feedback-feedforward active noise-reducing headset--the effect of the acoustics on broadband performance.
    Rafaely B; Jones M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):981-9. PubMed ID: 12243187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Azimuthal auditory localization of gunshots in a realistic field environment: effects of open-ear versus hearing protection-enhancement devices (HPEDs), military vehicle noise, and hearing impairment.
    Talcott KA; Casali JG; Keady JP; Killion MC
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51 Suppl 1():S20-30. PubMed ID: 22264060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Impact of firefighter hood design on range of motion, noise production and hearing.
    Kesler RM; Deaton AS; Ormond RB; Silverstein S; Donlin KL; Horn GP
    Ergonomics; 2024 Sep; 67(9):1247-1256. PubMed ID: 38050378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Auditory localization in the horizontal plane with single and double hearing protection.
    Brungart DS; Kordik AJ; Simpson BD; McKinley RL
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2003 Sep; 74(9):937-46. PubMed ID: 14503671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss for four hearing protection devices in field conditions.
    Murphy WJ; Flamme GA; Meinke DK; Sondergaard J; Finan DS; Lankford JE; Khan A; Vernon J; Stewart M
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51 Suppl 1(0 1):S31-42. PubMed ID: 22176308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Is it necessary to measure hearing protector attenuation at 3.15 and 6.3 kHz?
    Berger EH; Rowland LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1590-4. PubMed ID: 2708676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effectiveness of earmuffs on the physiologic and behavioral stability in preterm infants.
    Khalesi N; Khosravi N; Ranjbar A; Godarzi Z; Karimi A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jul; 98():43-47. PubMed ID: 28583502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Impulse noise and hand-arm vibration in relation to sensory neural hearing loss.
    Starck J; Pekkarinen J; Pyykkö I
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1988 Aug; 14(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 3175560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The challenge of localizing vehicle backup alarms: effects of passive and electronic hearing protectors, ambient noise level, and backup alarm spectral content.
    Alali KA; Casali JG
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):99-112. PubMed ID: 21368435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The acoustical attenuation of some combinations of earplugs and earmuffs.
    Rawlinson RD; Wheeler PD; Custard G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1987; 31(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 3426030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.