These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33693016)

  • 21. Phantom-based image quality assessment of clinical
    Gnesin S; Kieffer C; Zeimpekis K; Papazyan JP; Guignard R; Prior JO; Verdun FR; Lima TVM
    EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Jan; 7(1):1. PubMed ID: 31907664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Image quality and detectability in Siemens Biograph PET/MRI and PET/CT systems-a phantom study.
    Øen SK; Aasheim LB; Eikenes L; Karlberg AM
    EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Aug; 6(1):16. PubMed ID: 31385052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How fast can we scan patients with modern (digital) PET/CT systems?
    Lasnon C; Coudrais N; Houdu B; Nganoa C; Salomon T; Enilorac B; Aide N
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 129():109144. PubMed ID: 32593080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality.
    Sonni I; Baratto L; Park S; Hatami N; Srinivas S; Davidzon G; Gambhir SS; Iagaru A
    EJNMMI Phys; 2018 Apr; 5(1):9. PubMed ID: 29666972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of patient weight and emission scan duration on PET/CT image quality and lesion detectability.
    Halpern BS; Dahlbom M; Quon A; Schiepers C; Waldherr C; Silverman DH; Ratib O; Czernin J
    J Nucl Med; 2004 May; 45(5):797-801. PubMed ID: 15136629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance of a Digital PET Prototype in Patients with Oncologic Diseases: Initial Experience and Comparison with Analog PET.
    Nguyen NC; Vercher-Conejero JL; Sattar A; Miller MA; Maniawski PJ; Jordan DW; Muzic RF; Su KH; O'Donnell JK; Faulhaber PF
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1378-85. PubMed ID: 26159588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Feasibility of
    Sah BR; Ghafoor S; Burger IA; Ter Voert EEGW; Sekine T; Delso G; Huellner M; Dedes KJ; Boss A; Veit-Haibach P
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1817-1822. PubMed ID: 29880506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of image quality and spatial resolution between
    Braune A; Oehme L; Freudenberg R; Hofheinz F; van den Hoff J; Kotzerke J; Hoberück S
    EJNMMI Phys; 2022 Sep; 9(1):58. PubMed ID: 36064989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm on image quality in novel digital PET/CT: clinical implications for the assessment of lung tumors.
    Messerli M; Stolzmann P; Egger-Sigg M; Trinckauf J; D'Aguanno S; Burger IA; von Schulthess GK; Kaufmann PA; Huellner MW
    EJNMMI Phys; 2018 Sep; 5(1):27. PubMed ID: 30255439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for low-count clinical
    Te Riet J; Rijnsdorp S; Roef MJ; Arends AJ
    EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 31889228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Benefit of Improved Performance with State-of-the Art Digital PET/CT for Lesion Detection in Oncology.
    Surti S; Viswanath V; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Conti M; Casey ME; Karp JS
    J Nucl Med; 2020 Nov; 61(11):1684-1690. PubMed ID: 32198313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optimization of a dedicated protocol using a small-voxel PSF reconstruction for head-and-neck
    Ciappuccini R; Desmonts C; Licaj I; Blanc-Fournier C; Bardet S; Aide N
    EJNMMI Res; 2018 Dec; 8(1):104. PubMed ID: 30511173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction.
    Carlier T; Willowson KP; Fourkal E; Bailey DL; Doss M; Conti M
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Tumor volume delineation: A pilot study comparing a digital positron-emission tomography prototype with an analog positron-emission tomography system.
    Nguyen NC; Vercher-Conejero J; Faulhaber P
    World J Nucl Med; 2019; 18(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 30774546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Head-to-head comparison between digital and analog PET of human and phantom images when optimized for maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio from small lesions.
    Salvadori J; Odille F; Verger A; Olivier P; Karcher G; Marie PY; Imbert L
    EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Feb; 7(1):11. PubMed ID: 32086646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Objective and subjective comparison of standard 2-D and fully 3-D reconstructed data on a PET/CT system.
    Strobel K; Rüdy M; Treyer V; Veit-Haibach P; Burger C; Hany TF
    Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Jul; 28(7):555-9. PubMed ID: 17538397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of PET acquisition durations on image quality and lesion detectability in whole-body
    Noto B; Büther F; Auf der Springe K; Avramovic N; Heindel W; Schäfers M; Allkemper T; Stegger L
    EJNMMI Res; 2017 Dec; 7(1):12. PubMed ID: 28168589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Direct comparison of brain [
    Wagatsuma K; Sakata M; Ishibashi K; Hirayama A; Kawakami H; Miwa K; Suzuki Y; Ishii K
    EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Nov; 7(1):70. PubMed ID: 33226451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How to harmonize SUVs obtained by hybrid PET/CT scanners with and without point spread function correction.
    Ferretti A; Chondrogiannis S; Rampin L; Bellan E; Marzola MC; Grassetto G; Gusella S; Maffione AM; Gava M; Rubello D
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235010. PubMed ID: 30474620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.