These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3369605)

  • 1. Urban hospital cesarean section delivery rates in Paraíba State, Brazil, 1977-81.
    Rodrigues J
    Am J Public Health; 1988 Jun; 78(6):704-5. PubMed ID: 3369605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cesarean delivery rates, hospital readiness and quality of clinical management in Ethiopia: national results from two cross-sectional emergency obstetric and newborn care assessments.
    Beyene MG; Zemedu TG; Gebregiorgis AH; Ruano AL; Bailey PE
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Aug; 21(1):571. PubMed ID: 34412599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of factors influencing the rise of cesarean sections rates in Pakistan, using MCDM.
    Ali Y; Khan MW; Mumtaz U; Salman A; Muhammad N; Sabir M
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2018 Oct; 31(8):1058-1069. PubMed ID: 30415618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hospital variation in cesarean delivery rates: contribution of individual and hospital factors in Florida.
    Sebastião YV; Womack L; Vamos CA; Louis JM; Olaoye F; Caragan T; Bubu OM; Detman LA; Curran JS; Sappenfield WM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):123.e1-123.e18. PubMed ID: 26292046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Primary Cesarean Delivery Rates Among Low-Risk Women in Urban and Rural Hospitals in Hawaii.
    Chang AL; Pacheco M; Yoshino K; Miyamura J; Maddock J
    Matern Child Health J; 2016 Sep; 20(9):1965-70. PubMed ID: 27146394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Delivery after cesarean section based on the data of the Obstetrical-Gynecological Clinic of the Higher Medical Institute in Plovdiv for the period of 1984-1988].
    Milchev N; Pekhlivanov B; Piperkov T; Masarliev A; Amaliev I
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1990; 29(3):8-11. PubMed ID: 2252157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section.
    Stafford RS
    JAMA; 1991 Jan; 265(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 1984126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Rooming-in and cesarean section in maternity hospitals in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil].
    de Oliveira MI; Leal Mdo C
    Rev Saude Publica; 1997 Dec; 31(6):572-80. PubMed ID: 9629712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cesarean delivery among nulliparous women in Beirut: assessing predictors in nine hospitals.
    Tamim H; El-Chemaly SY; Nassar AH; Aaraj AM; Campbell OM; Kaddour AA; Yunis KA;
    Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 17324173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Institutional setting and wealth gradients in cesarean delivery rates: Evidence from six developing countries.
    Sepehri A
    Birth; 2018 Jun; 45(2):148-158. PubMed ID: 29314234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Epidemic of cesarean section at the general, private and university hospitals in Thailand.
    Chanrachakul B; Herabutya Y; Udomsubpayakul U
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2000 Oct; 26(5):357-61. PubMed ID: 11147723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing variation in hospital rates of cesarean delivery among low-risk women using 3 different measures.
    Armstrong JC; Kozhimannil KB; McDermott P; Saade GR; Srinivas SK;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 214(2):153-163. PubMed ID: 26593970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State.
    McKenzie L; Stephenson PA
    Am J Public Health; 1993 Aug; 83(8):1109-12. PubMed ID: 8342718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hospital-ownership status and cesareans in the United States: The effect of for-profit hospitals.
    Morris T; McNamara K; Morton CH
    Birth; 2017 Dec; 44(4):325-330. PubMed ID: 28737270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The U.S. Twin Delivery Volume and Association with Cesarean Delivery Rates: A Hospital-Level Analysis.
    Easter SR; Robinson JN; Carusi D; Little SE
    Am J Perinatol; 2018 Mar; 35(4):345-353. PubMed ID: 29020694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. International differences in the use of obstetric interventions.
    Notzon FC
    JAMA; 1990 Jun; 263(24):3286-91. PubMed ID: 2348539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors associated with cesarean delivery in public and private hospitals in a city of northeastern Brazil: a cross-sectional study.
    Vieira GO; Fernandes LG; de Oliveira NF; Silva LR; Vieira Tde O
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Jun; 15():132. PubMed ID: 26043857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: a comparison of rural and metropolitan rates in Oklahoma.
    Sieck CC
    J Okla State Med Assoc; 1997; 90(8):444-9. PubMed ID: 9816391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cesarean delivery in northeast region of Brazil, 1978-80.
    Janowitz B; Rodrigues W; Covington DL; Arruda JM; Morris L
    Am J Public Health; 1985 May; 75(5):560-2. PubMed ID: 3985249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-evaluation of obstetricians by delivery data to reduce cesarean section rate in Chai Nat Hospital.
    Kunthonkitidej K; Ngernset O
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Nov; 84(11):1587-93. PubMed ID: 11853302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.