These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33704373)

  • 1. Is there a serial bottleneck in visual object recognition?
    Popovkina DV; Palmer J; Moore CM; Boynton GM
    J Vis; 2021 Mar; 21(3):15. PubMed ID: 33704373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence of Serial Processing in Visual Word Recognition.
    White AL; Palmer J; Boynton GM
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Jul; 29(7):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 29733752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beyond a mask and against the bottleneck: retroactive dual-task interference during working memory consolidation of a masked visual target.
    Nieuwenstein M; Wyble B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Jun; 143(3):1409-1427. PubMed ID: 24364683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The subjective experience of object recognition: comparing metacognition for object detection and object categorization.
    Meuwese JD; van Loon AM; Lamme VA; Fahrenfort JJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1057-68. PubMed ID: 24554231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hysteresis in the dynamic perception of scenes and objects.
    Poltoratski S; Tong F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Oct; 143(5):1875-92. PubMed ID: 25150947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory and visual distractors disrupt multisensory temporal acuity in the crossmodal temporal order judgment task.
    Dean CL; Eggleston BA; Gibney KD; Aligbe E; Blackwell M; Kwakye LD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179564. PubMed ID: 28723907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Divided attention limits perception of 3-D object shapes.
    Scharff A; Palmer J; Moore CM
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):18. PubMed ID: 23404158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual word recognition: Evidence for a serial bottleneck in lexical access.
    White AL; Palmer J; Boynton GM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):2000-2017. PubMed ID: 31832892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What limits search for conjunctions of simple visual features?
    Põder E; Kosilo M
    J Vis; 2019 Jul; 19(7):4. PubMed ID: 31287858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks.
    Popovkina DV; Palmer J; Moore CM; Boynton GM
    J Vis; 2023 Nov; 23(13):3. PubMed ID: 37922155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Top-down preparation modulates visual categorization but not subjective awareness of objects presented in natural backgrounds.
    Koivisto M; Kahila E
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():73-80. PubMed ID: 28202397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implicitly perceived objects attract gaze during later free viewing.
    Pertzov Y; Zohary E; Avidan G
    J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):6.1-12. PubMed ID: 19761297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Serial deployment of attention during visual search.
    Woodman GF; Luck SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):121-38. PubMed ID: 12669752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Crowding with conjunctions of simple features.
    Põder E; Wagemans J
    J Vis; 2007 Nov; 7(2):23.1-12. PubMed ID: 18217838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional modulation of masked semantic priming by visible and masked task cues.
    Kiefer M; Trumpp NM; Schaitz C; Reuss H; Kunde W
    Cognition; 2019 Jun; 187():62-77. PubMed ID: 30836302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ERP signs of categorical and supra-categorical processing of visual information.
    Zani A; Marsili G; Senerchia A; Orlandi A; Citron FM; Rizzi E; Proverbio AM
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():90-107. PubMed ID: 25447739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating the Brain Neural Mechanism when Signature Objects were Masked during a Scene Categorization Task using Functional MRI.
    Miao Q; Zhang G; Yan W; Liu B
    Neuroscience; 2018 Sep; 388():248-262. PubMed ID: 30056114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Divided attention and visual search for simple versus complex features.
    Davis ET; Shikano T; Peterson SA; Keyes Michel R
    Vision Res; 2003 Sep; 43(21):2213-32. PubMed ID: 12885376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.