359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33704537)
1. Extending the limits of vaginal hysterectomy under local anesthesia and conscious sedation.
Grigoriadis T; Zacharakis D; Kypriotis K; Protopapas A; Hadzillia S; Athanasiou S
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2287-2289. PubMed ID: 33704537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vaginal hysterectomy with anterior and posterior repair for pelvic organ prolapse under local anesthesia: results of a pilot study.
Athanasiou S; Zacharakis D; Grigoriadis T; Papalios T; Pitsouni E; Valsamidis D; Hadzillia S
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2109-2116. PubMed ID: 32617637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Vaginal hysterectomy for the enlarged non-prolapse uterus using morcellation techniques and/or Deschamps needle: a retrospective cohort study].
Santos-López A; Gorbea-Chávez V; Rodríguez-Colorado S; Ramírez C; Torres-Valdéz E; Gámez-Guerrero P
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2015 Mar; 83(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 26058167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review.
Tolstrup CK; Lose G; Klarskov N
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jan; 28(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 27485234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vaginal hysterectomy.
Amy JJ
Natl Med J India; 1997; 10(3):126-7. PubMed ID: 9230602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D;
JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between bisection/morcellation and myometrial coring for reducing large uteri during vaginal hysterectomy or laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: results of a randomized prospective study.
Nazah I; Robin F; Jais JP; Jeffry L; Lelievre L; Camatte S; Taurelle R; Lecuru F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Nov; 82(11):1037-42. PubMed ID: 14616278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy and Apical Suspension of the Vaginal Cuff to the Uterosacral Ligament.
Lowenstein L; Baekelandt J; Paz Y; Lauterbach R; Matanes E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1015. PubMed ID: 30980991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Formal institutional guidelines promotes the vaginal approach to hysterectomy in patients with benign disease and non-prolapsed uterus.
Chrysostomou A; Djokovic D; Libhaber E; Edridge W; van Herendael BJ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Apr; 259():133-139. PubMed ID: 33662755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modified extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension for prevention of vault prolapse after vaginal hysterectomy.
Pal M; Bandyopadhyay S
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):633-637. PubMed ID: 29777272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mesh-Free Laparoscopic High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Uterine Prolapse.
Jan H; Ghai V; Doumouchtsis SK
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(6):952-953. PubMed ID: 29274382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conservation of the prolapsed uterus is a valid option: medium term results of a prospective comparative study with the posterior intravaginal slingoplasty operation.
Neuman M; Lavy Y
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2007 Aug; 18(8):889-93. PubMed ID: 17136484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Vaginal hysterectomy for large uterus].
Liu Z; Lang J; Sun D
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Aug; 34(8):456-8. PubMed ID: 11360591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched historical cohort study.
Tolstrup CK; Husby KR; Lose G; Kopp TI; Viborg PH; Kesmodel US; Klarskov N
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Mar; 29(3):431-440. PubMed ID: 29288346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vaginal hysterectomy for the prolapsed uterus.
Lucero M; Shah AD
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 53(1):26-39. PubMed ID: 20142641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation Under Local Anesthesia in Elderly Patients at High Risk of General Anesthesia.
Senturk MB; Doğan O
J Invest Surg; 2020 Jan; 33(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 29733751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]