223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33704562)
1. The transverse coloplasty pouch is technically easy and safe and improves functional outcomes after low rectal cancer resection-a single center experience with 397 patients.
Fritz S; Hennig R; Kantas C; Killguss H; Schaudt A; Feilhauer K; Köninger J
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2021 May; 406(3):833-841. PubMed ID: 33704562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new surgical concept for rectal replacement after low anterior resection: the transverse coloplasty pouch.
Z'graggen K; Maurer CA; Birrer S; Giachino D; Kern B; Büchler MW
Ann Surg; 2001 Dec; 234(6):780-5; discussion 785-7. PubMed ID: 11729384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Morbidity Following Coloanal Anastomosis: A Comparison of Colonic J-Pouch vs Straight Anastomosis.
Brown S; Margolin DA; Altom LK; Green H; Beck DE; Kann BR; Whitlow CB; Vargas HD
Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Feb; 61(2):156-161. PubMed ID: 29337769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transverse Coloplasty Pouch versus Straight Coloanal Anastomosis Following Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: the Functional Benefits May Emerge After Two Years.
Pan H; Zhao Z; Deng Y; Zheng Z; Huang Y; Chi P; Huang S
J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Nov; 27(11):2526-2537. PubMed ID: 37848684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of life, functional outcome, and complications of coloplasty pouch after low anterior resection.
Remzi FH; Fazio VW; Gorgun E; Zutshi M; Church JM; Lavery IC; Hull TL
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Apr; 48(4):735-43. PubMed ID: 15785900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colonic J-pouch vs. coloplasty following resection of distal rectal cancer: early results of a prospective, randomized, pilot study.
Fürst A; Suttner S; Agha A; Beham A; Jauch KW
Dis Colon Rectum; 2003 Sep; 46(9):1161-6. PubMed ID: 12972958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transverse coloplasty pouch and colonic J-pouch for rectal cancer--a comparative study.
Pimentel JM; Duarte A; Gregório C; Souto P; Patrício J
Colorectal Dis; 2003 Sep; 5(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 12925082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis after ultralow anterior resection with upper sphincter excision for low-lying rectal cancer.
Park JG; Lee MR; Lim SB; Hong CW; Yoon SN; Kang SB; Heo SC; Jeong SY; Park KJ
World J Gastroenterol; 2005 May; 11(17):2570-3. PubMed ID: 15849813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.
Selvindos PB; Ho YH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1710-1. PubMed ID: 18679748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Continence of anorectal sphincter complex in the early postoperative period after direct colo-anal anastomoses with colo-colic J pouch].
Damianov N; Tankova L; Draganov V
Khirurgiia (Sofiia); 2003; 59(1-2):32-4. PubMed ID: 15587742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term functional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch: is the functional superiority of colonic J-pouch sustained?
Joo JS; Latulippe JF; Alabaz O; Weiss EG; Nogueras JJ; Wexner SD
Dis Colon Rectum; 1998 Jun; 41(6):740-6. PubMed ID: 9645742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis.
Fürst A; Burghofer K; Hutzel L; Jauch KW
Dis Colon Rectum; 2002 May; 45(5):660-7. PubMed ID: 12004217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transabdominal anastomosis after low anterior resection: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term results between side-to-end anastomosis and colonic J-pouch.
Jiang JK; Yang SH; Lin JK
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Nov; 48(11):2100-8; discussion 2108-10. PubMed ID: 16132480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Techniques for restoring bowel continuity and function after rectal cancer surgery.
Ho YH
World J Gastroenterol; 2006 Oct; 12(39):6252-60. PubMed ID: 17072945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coloplasty in low colorectal anastomosis: manometric and functional comparison with straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis.
Mantyh CR; Hull TL; Fazio VW
Dis Colon Rectum; 2001 Jan; 44(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 11805561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reconstructive techniques after rectal resection for rectal cancer.
Brown CJ; Fenech DS; McLeod RS
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Apr; 2008(2):CD006040. PubMed ID: 18425933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Functional outcome after coloanal versus low colorectal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma.
Benoist S; Panis Y; Boleslawski E; Hautefeuille P; Valleur P
J Am Coll Surg; 1997 Aug; 185(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 9249077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Colonic pouch and other procedures to improve the continence after low anterior rectal resection with TME].
Gross E; Möslein G
Zentralbl Chir; 2008 Apr; 133(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 18415896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Construction of a neorectum after rectal excision: colonic pouches].
Rullier E
Ann Chir; 2002 Feb; 127(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 11885379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transverse coloplasty pouch after total mesorectal excision: functional assessment of evacuation.
Köninger JS; Butters M; Redecke JD; Z'graggen K
Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Oct; 47(10):1586-93. PubMed ID: 15540285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
