BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33706552)

  • 1. Obesity and Outcomes Following Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support.
    Sreenivasan J; Khan MS; Sharedalal P; Hooda U; Fudim M; Demmer RT; Yuzefpolskaya M; Ahmad H; Khan SS; Lanier GM; Colombo PC; Rich JD
    Circ Heart Fail; 2021 Mar; 14(3):e007937. PubMed ID: 33706552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential Prognostic Implications of Vasoactive Inotropic Score for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock According to Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support.
    Choi KH; Yang JH; Park TK; Lee JM; Song YB; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Ko YG; Yu CW; Chun WJ; Jang WJ; Kim HJ; Bae JW; Kwon SU; Lee HJ; Lee WS; Jeong JO; Park SD; Cho S; Gwon HC
    Crit Care Med; 2021 May; 49(5):770-780. PubMed ID: 33590998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early vs. delayed mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.
    Buda KG; Hryniewicz K; Eckman PM; Basir MB; Cowger JA; Alaswad K; Mukundan S; Sandoval Y; Elliott A; Brilakis ES; Megaly MS
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2024 May; 13(5):390-397. PubMed ID: 38502888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In-Hospital Utilization and Outcomes of Palliative Care Consultation in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Mechanical Circulatory Support.
    Grant JK; Vincent L; Ebner B; Singh H; Maning J; Olorunfemi O; Olarte NI; Zablah G; Zaw K; Colombo R
    Am J Cardiol; 2021 Jun; 148():94-101. PubMed ID: 33684373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz A; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor C; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Readmissions in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock (from Nationwide Readmission Database).
    Sud K; Haddadin F; Tsutsui RS; Parashar A; Bandyopadhyay D; Ellis SG; Tuzcu EM; Kapadia S
    Am J Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 124(12):1841-1850. PubMed ID: 31685215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender Differences in the Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support.
    Bravo-Jaimes K; Mejia MO; Abelhad NI; Zhou Y; Jumean MF; Nathan S; Dhoble A
    Am J Cardiol; 2022 Jul; 174():20-26. PubMed ID: 35469654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
    Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hospital Variation in the Utilization of Short-Term Nondurable Mechanical Circulatory Support in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Strom JB; Zhao Y; Shen C; Chung M; Pinto DS; Popma JJ; Cohen DJ; Yeh RW
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jan; 12(1):e007270. PubMed ID: 30608880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early and late outcomes of 517 consecutive adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock.
    Rastan AJ; Dege A; Mohr M; Doll N; Falk V; Walther T; Mohr FW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Feb; 139(2):302-11, 311.e1. PubMed ID: 20106393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical Outcomes Associated With Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support Utilization in Heart Failure Related Cardiogenic Shock.
    Hernandez-Montfort J; Sinha SS; Thayer KL; Whitehead EH; Pahuja M; Garan AR; Mahr C; Haywood JL; Harwani NM; Schaeffer A; Wencker D; Kanwar M; Vorovich E; Abraham J; Burkhoff D; Kapur NK
    Circ Heart Fail; 2021 May; 14(5):e007924. PubMed ID: 33905259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiogenic Shock in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Versus Acute Myocardial Infarction: An 8-Year National Perspective on Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes.
    Vallabhajosyula S; Dunlay SM; Murphree DH; Barsness GW; Sandhu GS; Lerman A; Prasad A
    JACC Heart Fail; 2019 Jun; 7(6):469-476. PubMed ID: 31078481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
    Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Utilization and Outcomes of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.
    Enezate T; Eniezat M; Thomas J
    Am J Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 124(4):505-510. PubMed ID: 31204034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of Hospitalizations for Cardiogenic Shock at Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Non-Left Ventricular Assist Device Centers.
    Wang JI; Lu DY; Mhs ; Feldman DN; McCullough SA; Goyal P; Karas MG; Sobol I; Horn EM; Kim LK; Krishnan U
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2020 Dec; 9(23):e017326. PubMed ID: 33222608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cardiogenic shock during heart failure hospitalizations: Age-, sex-, and race-stratified trends in incidence and outcomes.
    Yandrapalli S; Sanaani A; Harikrishnan P; Aronow WS; Frishman WH; Lanier GM; Ahmed A; Fonarow GC
    Am Heart J; 2019 Jul; 213():18-29. PubMed ID: 31078113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical circulatory assistance in myocardial infarction with refractory cardiogenic shock: clinical experience in 10 patients at a teaching hospital in Rouen.
    Brunet D; Eltchaninoff H; Kerkeni M; Tron C; Baala B; Litzler PY; Bessou JP; Cribier A
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2008 Jan; 101(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 18391870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Shock.
    Sodhi N; Lasala JM
    Interv Cardiol Clin; 2017 Jul; 6(3):387-405. PubMed ID: 28600092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trends in incidence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States.
    Kolte D; Khera S; Aronow WS; Mujib M; Palaniswamy C; Sule S; Jain D; Gotsis W; Ahmed A; Frishman WH; Fonarow GC
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2014 Jan; 3(1):e000590. PubMed ID: 24419737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Rise of Endovascular Mechanical Circulatory Support Use for Cardiogenic Shock and High Risk Coronary Intervention: Considerations and Challenges.
    Schwartz B; Jain P; Salama M; Kapur NK
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2021 Feb; 19(2):151-164. PubMed ID: 33356662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.