These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33706791)
1. Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study. Ms R; Riffelmann M; Kunze-Szikszay N; Lier M; Schmid O; Haus H; Schneider S; Jf H Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2021 Mar; 29(1):46. PubMed ID: 33706791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pain and tissue-interface pressures during spine-board immobilization. Cordell WH; Hollingsworth JC; Olinger ML; Stroman SJ; Nelson DR Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Jul; 26(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7793717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of cervical spine immobilization during patient transport in emergency medical services. Nolte PC; Uzun DD; Häske D; Weerts J; Münzberg M; Rittmann A; Grützner PA; Kreinest M Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2021 Jun; 47(3):719-726. PubMed ID: 31030223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the Efficacy of Methods for Immobilizing the Thoracic-Lumbar Spine. Rahmatalla S; DeShaw J; Stilley J; Denning G; Jennissen C Air Med J; 2018; 37(3):178-185. PubMed ID: 29735231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing the Efficacy of Long Spinal Board, Sked Stretcher, and Vacuum Mattress in Cervical Spine Immobilization; a Method-Oriented Experimental Study. Liengswangwong W; Lertviboonluk N; Yuksen C; Laksanamapune T; Limroongreungrat W; Mongkolpichayaruk A; Tharawadeepimuk K; Jamkrajang P; Sook-Oum P; Watcharakitpaisan S Arch Acad Emerg Med; 2023; 11(1):e44. PubMed ID: 37609542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of different techniques for prehospital cervical spine immobilization: Biomechanical measurements with a wireless motion capture system. Morag S; Kieninger M; Eissnert C; Auer S; Dendorfer S; Popp D; Hoffmann J; Kieninger B PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0292300. PubMed ID: 38015902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Vacuum Mattress versus the Spine Board Alone for Immobilization of the Cervical Spine Injured Patient: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study. Prasarn ML; Hyldmo PK; Zdziarski LA; Loewy E; Dubose D; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):E1398-E1402. PubMed ID: 28591075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New clinical guidelines on the spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients - consensus and evidence based. Maschmann C; Jeppesen E; Rubin MA; Barfod C Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2019 Aug; 27(1):77. PubMed ID: 31426850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of tissue-interface pressure in healthy subjects lying on two trauma splinting devices: The vacuum mattress splint and long spine board. Pernik MN; Seidel HH; Blalock RE; Burgess AR; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR; Prasarn ML Injury; 2016 Aug; 47(8):1801-5. PubMed ID: 27324323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long backboard versus vacuum mattress splint to immobilize whole spine in trauma victims in the field: a randomized clinical trial. Mahshidfar B; Mofidi M; Yari AR; Mehrsorosh S Prehosp Disaster Med; 2013 Oct; 28(5):462-5. PubMed ID: 23746392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of a long spinal board and vacuum mattress for spinal immobilisation. Luscombe MD; Williams JL Emerg Med J; 2003 Sep; 20(5):476-8. PubMed ID: 12954698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patients Immobilized with a Long Spine Board Rarely Have Unstable Thoracolumbar Injuries. Clemency BM; Bart JA; Malhotra A; Klun T; Campanella V; Lindstrom HA Prehosp Emerg Care; 2016; 20(2):266-72. PubMed ID: 27002350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reduced tissue-interface pressure and increased comfort on a newly developed soft-layered long spineboard. Hemmes B; Poeze M; Brink PR J Trauma; 2010 Mar; 68(3):593-8. PubMed ID: 19918198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Remaining Cervical Spine Movement Under Different Immobilization Techniques. Uzun DD; Jung MK; Weerts J; Münzberg M; Grützner PA; Häske D; Kreinest M Prehosp Disaster Med; 2020 Aug; 35(4):382-387. PubMed ID: 32430091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Comparison of Cervical Spine Motion After Immobilization With a Traditional Spine Board and Full-Body Vacuum-Mattress Splint. Etier BE; Norte GE; Gleason MM; Richter DL; Pugh KF; Thomson KB; Slater LV; Hart JM; Brockmeier SF; Diduch DR Orthop J Sports Med; 2017 Dec; 5(12):2325967117744757. PubMed ID: 29318167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]