These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33709147)

  • 1. Responsible Practice or Restricted Practice? an Empirical Study of the Use of Clinical Guidelines in Medical Negligence Litigation.
    Samanta A; Samanta J; Beswick J
    Med Law Rev; 2021 Aug; 29(2):205-232. PubMed ID: 33709147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "If the Problem Persists, Come Back To See Me … ."-An Empirical Study of Clinical Negligence Cases Against General Practitioners.
    Heywood R
    Med Law Rev; 2019 Aug; 27(3):406-431. PubMed ID: 30307520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Legal standard of care: a shift from the traditional Bolam test.
    Samanta A; Samanta J
    Clin Med (Lond); 2003; 3(5):443-6. PubMed ID: 14601944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The standard of care and expert evidence of accepted practice in medical negligence.
    Manning J
    J Law Med; 2007 Dec; 15(3):394-407. PubMed ID: 18251423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of clinical guidelines in medical negligence litigation: a shift from the Bolam standard?
    Samanta A; Mello MM; Foster C; Tingle J; Samanta J
    Med Law Rev; 2006; 14(3):321-66. PubMed ID: 16901977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The healthcare professional and the Bolam test.
    Jones JW
    Br Dent J; 2000 Mar; 188(5):237-40. PubMed ID: 10758684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The decline of judicial deference to medical opinion in medical negligence litigation in Malaysia.
    Kassim PN
    Med Law; 2008 Jun; 27(2):307-24. PubMed ID: 18693483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical practice guidelines in malpractice litigation: an early retrospective.
    Hyams AL; Shapiro DW; Brennan TA
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1996; 21(2):289-313. PubMed ID: 8723179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of clinical guidelines in medical negligence litigation: has India made the shift?
    Bhatt M
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2009; 6(3):158-9. PubMed ID: 19653595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association between civil procedure and medical malpractice litigation in Japan.
    Hagihara A; Nishi M; Nobutomo K
    Med Law; 2004; 23(2):269-88. PubMed ID: 15270470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The changing face of medical negligence law: from Bolam to Bolitho.
    Sooriakumaran P
    Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2008 Jun; 69(6):335-8. PubMed ID: 18646413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standard setting and litigation.
    Dimond B
    Br J Nurs; 1994 Mar 10-23; 3(5):235-8. PubMed ID: 8173270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Negligence and the legal standard of care: what is 'reasonable' conduct?
    Miola J
    Br J Nurs; 2009 Jun 25-Jul 8; 18(12):756-7. PubMed ID: 19543163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expert testimony, legal reasoning, and justice. The case for adopting a data-based standard of care in allegations of medical negligence in the NICU.
    Meadow W; Lantos JD
    Clin Perinatol; 1996 Sep; 23(3):583-95. PubMed ID: 8884129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medical negligence: who sets the standard?
    Norrie KM
    J Med Ethics; 1985 Sep; 11(3):135-7. PubMed ID: 4057217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Guidelines and jurisprudence: advice, guidance or regulation?].
    Hurwitz B
    Epidemiol Prev; 1998; 22(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 9789380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Poor agreement among expert witnesses in bile duct injury malpractice litigation: an expert panel survey.
    de Reuver PR; Dijkgraaf MG; Gevers SK; Gouma DJ;
    Ann Surg; 2008 Nov; 248(5):815-20. PubMed ID: 18948809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The misplace of litigation in medical practice.
    Wood C
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Nov; 38(4):365-76. PubMed ID: 9890212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical guidelines as a tool for legal liability. An international perspective.
    Davies J
    Med Law; 2009 Dec; 28(4):603-13. PubMed ID: 20157973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adapting to concurrent expert evidence in medical litigation.
    Cockburn T; Madden B
    J Law Med; 2015 Mar; 22(3):610-31. PubMed ID: 25980193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.