BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33709636)

  • 1. A novel machine learning approach (svmSomatic) to distinguish somatic and germline mutations using next-generation sequencing data.
    Mao YF; Yuan XG; Cun YP
    Zool Res; 2021 Mar; 42(2):246-249. PubMed ID: 33709636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. TumorNext: A comprehensive tumor profiling assay that incorporates high resolution copy number analysis and germline status to improve testing accuracy.
    Gray PN; Vuong H; Tsai P; Lu HM; Mu W; Hsuan V; Hoo J; Shah S; Uyeda L; Fox S; Patel H; Janicek M; Brown S; Dobrea L; Wagman L; Plimack E; Mehra R; Golemis EA; Bilusic M; Zibelman M; Elliott A
    Oncotarget; 2016 Oct; 7(42):68206-68228. PubMed ID: 27626691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SNVSniffer: an integrated caller for germline and somatic single-nucleotide and indel mutations.
    Liu Y; Loewer M; Aluru S; Schmidt B
    BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):47. PubMed ID: 27489955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A computational approach to distinguish somatic vs. germline origin of genomic alterations from deep sequencing of cancer specimens without a matched normal.
    Sun JX; He Y; Sanford E; Montesion M; Frampton GM; Vignot S; Soria JC; Ross JS; Miller VA; Stephens PJ; Lipson D; Yelensky R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Feb; 14(2):e1005965. PubMed ID: 29415044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method to reduce ancestry related germline false positives in tumor only somatic variant calling.
    Halperin RF; Carpten JD; Manojlovic Z; Aldrich J; Keats J; Byron S; Liang WS; Russell M; Enriquez D; Claasen A; Cherni I; Awuah B; Oppong J; Wicha MS; Newman LA; Jaigge E; Kim S; Craig DW
    BMC Med Genomics; 2017 Oct; 10(1):61. PubMed ID: 29052513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ISOWN: accurate somatic mutation identification in the absence of normal tissue controls.
    Kalatskaya I; Trinh QM; Spears M; McPherson JD; Bartlett JMS; Stein L
    Genome Med; 2017 Jun; 9(1):59. PubMed ID: 28659176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. STIC: Predicting Single Nucleotide Variants and Tumor Purity in Cancer Genome.
    Yuan X; Ma C; Zhao H; Yang L; Wang S; Xi J
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2021; 18(6):2692-2701. PubMed ID: 32086221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Targeted capture-based NGS is superior to multiplex PCR-based NGS for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene analysis in FFPE tumor samples.
    Zakrzewski F; Gieldon L; Rump A; Seifert M; Grützmann K; Krüger A; Loos S; Zeugner S; Hackmann K; Porrmann J; Wagner J; Kast K; Wimberger P; Baretton G; Schröck E; Aust D; Klink B
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Apr; 19(1):396. PubMed ID: 31029168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CNV-RF Is a Random Forest-Based Copy Number Variation Detection Method Using Next-Generation Sequencing.
    Onsongo G; Baughn LB; Bower M; Henzler C; Schomaker M; Silverstein KA; Thyagarajan B
    J Mol Diagn; 2016 Nov; 18(6):872-881. PubMed ID: 27597741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High performance of targeted next generation sequencing on variance detection in clinical tumor specimens in comparison with current conventional methods.
    Su D; Zhang D; Chen K; Lu J; Wu J; Cao X; Ying L; Jin Q; Ye Y; Xie Z; Xiong L; Mao W; Li F
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2017 Sep; 36(1):121. PubMed ID: 28882180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical massively parallel next-generation sequencing analysis of 409 cancer-related genes for mutations and copy number variations in solid tumours.
    Singh RR; Patel KP; Routbort MJ; Aldape K; Lu X; Manekia J; Abraham R; Reddy NG; Barkoh BA; Veliyathu J; Medeiros LJ; Luthra R
    Br J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 111(10):2014-23. PubMed ID: 25314059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SILO: A Computational Method for Detecting Copy Number Gain in Clinical Specimens Analyzed on a Next-Generation Sequencing Platform.
    Miller N; Bouma M; Sabatini L; Gulukota K
    J Mol Diagn; 2021 Oct; 23(10):1241-1248. PubMed ID: 34365010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SomaticSeq: An Ensemble and Machine Learning Method to Detect Somatic Mutations.
    Fang LT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2120():47-70. PubMed ID: 32124311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Machine learning random forest for predicting oncosomatic variant NGS analysis.
    Pellegrino E; Jacques C; Beaufils N; Nanni I; Carlioz A; Metellus P; Ouafik L
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):21820. PubMed ID: 34750410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
    Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Targeted next generation sequencing of RB1 gene for the molecular diagnosis of Retinoblastoma.
    Devarajan B; Prakash L; Kannan TR; Abraham AA; Kim U; Muthukkaruppan V; Vanniarajan A
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():320. PubMed ID: 25928201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mutation discovery in regions of segmental cancer genome amplifications with CoNAn-SNV: a mixture model for next generation sequencing of tumors.
    Crisan A; Goya R; Ha G; Ding J; Prentice LM; Oloumi A; Senz J; Zeng T; Tse K; Delaney A; Marra MA; Huntsman DG; Hirst M; Aparicio S; Shah S
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e41551. PubMed ID: 22916110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational methods for detecting copy number variations in cancer genome using next generation sequencing: principles and challenges.
    Liu B; Morrison CD; Johnson CS; Trump DL; Qin M; Conroy JC; Wang J; Liu S
    Oncotarget; 2013 Nov; 4(11):1868-81. PubMed ID: 24240121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. RareVar: A Framework for Detecting Low-Frequency Single-Nucleotide Variants.
    Hao Y; Xuei X; Li L; Nakshatri H; Edenberg HJ; Liu Y
    J Comput Biol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):637-646. PubMed ID: 28541743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. mitoSomatic: a tool for accurate identification of mitochondrial DNA somatic mutations without paired controls.
    Guo W; Liu Y; Su L; Guo S; Xie F; Ji X; Zhou K; Guo X; Gu X; Xing J
    Mol Oncol; 2023 May; 17(5):857-871. PubMed ID: 36330809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.