281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33709990)
1. Civil Disobedience and Abortion Services After Roe v Wade: Legal and Ethical Considerations.
Minkoff H; Diaz-Tello F; Paulk LB
Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 137(4):626-628. PubMed ID: 33709990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The legal status of abortion in the States if Roe v. Wade is overruled.
Linton PB
Issues Law Med; 2012; 27(3):181-228. PubMed ID: 22696839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The legal status of abortion in the states if Roe v. Wade is overruled.
Linton PB
Issues Law Med; 2007; 23(1):3-43. PubMed ID: 17703698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
Benshoof J
Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Keeping abortion legal: a look beyond Roe v. Wade.
Stewart FH; Shields WC; Hwang AC
Contraception; 2003 Nov; 68(5):307-8. PubMed ID: 14636932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Activism for Abortion Rights and Access Is Global: What the United States Can Learn from the Rest of the World.
Kumar A
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2023 Aug; 48(4):593-602. PubMed ID: 36693184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
Bryant MD
Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Handicapping the odds on the future of Roe v. Wade: can the right to abortion survive in the High Court?
Drenning MG
Health Care Law Mon; 2003 Mar; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12698761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The constitutional right to therapeutic cloning.
Bellinger M
J Med Law; 2002; 7(1):37-53. PubMed ID: 17256230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.
Harrison LK; Naylor KL
Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does the Thirteenth Amendment provide a jurisdictional basis for a federal ban on cloning?
Vinck SC
J Legis; 2003; 30(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 17256218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
Martin PA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion in America: 12 years after Roe v. Wade.
Popul Today; 1985 Nov; 13(11):2, 8-9. PubMed ID: 12267463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SNEAKING AROUND THE CONSTITUTION: PRETEXTUAL "HEALTH" LAWS AND THE FUTURE OF ROE V. WADE.
Northup N
Health Matrix Clevel; 2016; 26():1-16. PubMed ID: 27263246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
Brown HO
Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two ships passing in the night: an interpretavist review of the White-Stevens colloquy on Roe v. Wade.
Horan DJ; Forsythe CD; Grant ER
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1987; 6(2):229-311. PubMed ID: 16086461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Let's rethink Roe v. Wade--and overturn it.
Mulder J
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):65-6. PubMed ID: 21161853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Legal abortion: the impending obsolescence of the trimester framework.
Mangel CP
Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(1):69-108. PubMed ID: 3068986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.
Koslov TI
Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
