These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3371024)

  • 1. A comparison of patient, family, and physician assessments of the value of medical intensive care.
    Danis M; Gerrity MS; Southerland LI; Patrick DL
    Crit Care Med; 1988 Jun; 16(6):594-600. PubMed ID: 3371024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patients' and families' preferences for medical intensive care.
    Danis M; Patrick DL; Southerland LI; Green ML
    JAMA; 1988 Aug; 260(6):797-802. PubMed ID: 3392810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forgoing life-sustaining treatments: comparison of attitudes between Israeli and North American intensive care healthcare professionals.
    Soudry E; Sprung CL; Levin PD; Grunfeld GB; Einav S
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2003 Nov; 5(11):770-4. PubMed ID: 14650099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physicians' attitudes towards living wills and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
    Brunetti LL; Carperos SD; Westlund RE
    J Gen Intern Med; 1991; 6(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 1890503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. End-of-life decisions in intensive care units: attitudes of physicians in an Italian urban setting.
    Giannini A; Pessina A; Tacchi EM
    Intensive Care Med; 2003 Nov; 29(11):1902-10. PubMed ID: 13680120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. End-of-life care in the pediatric intensive care unit: attitudes and practices of pediatric critical care physicians and nurses.
    Burns JP; Mitchell C; Griffith JL; Truog RD
    Crit Care Med; 2001 Mar; 29(3):658-64. PubMed ID: 11373439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attitudes of critical care medicine professionals concerning forgoing life-sustaining treatments. The Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee.
    Crit Care Med; 1992 Mar; 20(3):320-6. PubMed ID: 1541091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can we talk? Inpatient discussions about advance directives in a community hospital. Attending physicians' attitudes, their inpatients' wishes, and reported experience.
    Reilly BM; Magnussen CR; Ross J; Ash J; Papa L; Wagner M
    Arch Intern Med; 1994 Oct; 154(20):2299-308. PubMed ID: 7944852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of quality-of-life considerations in medical decision making.
    Pearlman RA; Jonsen A
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1985 May; 33(5):344-52. PubMed ID: 3989200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dignity and cost-effectiveness: a rejection of the utilitarian approach to death.
    Brooks SA
    J Med Ethics; 1984 Sep; 10(3):148-51. PubMed ID: 6502643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Withholding and withdrawing of life support from patients with severe head injury.
    O'Callahan JG; Fink C; Pitts LH; Luce JM
    Crit Care Med; 1995 Sep; 23(9):1567-75. PubMed ID: 7664560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physicians' predictions of elderly outpatients' preferences for life-sustaining treatment.
    Druley JA; Ditto PH; Moore KA; Danks JH; Townsend A; Smucker WD
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Nov; 37(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 8228859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.
    JAMA; 1995 Nov 22-29; 274(20):1591-8. PubMed ID: 7474243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physicians' attitudes toward tube feeding chronically ill nursing home patients.
    Von Preyss-Friedman SM; Uhlmann RF; Cain KC
    J Gen Intern Med; 1992; 7(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 1548547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient age and decisions to withhold life-sustaining treatments from seriously ill, hospitalized adults. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
    Hamel MB; Teno JM; Goldman L; Lynn J; Davis RB; Galanos AN; Desbiens N; Connors AF; Wenger N; Phillips RS
    Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jan; 130(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 10068357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physicians' psychosocial barriers to different modes of withdrawal of life support in critical care: A qualitative study in Japan.
    Aita K; Kai I
    Soc Sci Med; 2010 Feb; 70(4):616-22. PubMed ID: 19932548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mismatch between physicians and family members views on communications about patients with chronic incurable diseases receiving care in critical and intensive care settings in Georgia: a quantitative observational survey.
    Chikhladze N; Janberidze E; Velijanashvili M; Chkhartishvili N; Jintcharadze M; Verne J; Kordzaia D
    BMC Palliat Care; 2016 Jul; 15():63. PubMed ID: 27449224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding of elderly patients' resuscitation preferences by physicians and nurses.
    Uhlmann RF; Pearlman RA; Cain KC
    West J Med; 1989 Jun; 150(6):705-7. PubMed ID: 2750162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Family-physician interactions in the intensive care unit.
    Azoulay E; Sprung CL
    Crit Care Med; 2004 Nov; 32(11):2323-8. PubMed ID: 15640649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. End-of-life decisions in neonatal intensive care: physicians' self-reported practices in seven European countries. EURONIC Study Group.
    Cuttini M; Nadai M; Kaminski M; Hansen G; de Leeuw R; Lenoir S; Persson J; Rebagliato M; Reid M; de Vonderweid U; Lenard HG; Orzalesi M; Saracci R
    Lancet; 2000 Jun; 355(9221):2112-8. PubMed ID: 10902625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.