These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch: Characterizing Variability and the Influence on Speech Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Canfarotta MW; Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD; O'Connell BP Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1349-1361. PubMed ID: 32205726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Audiologic Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Cochlear Malformations: A Comparative Analysis of Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Electrode Arrays. Schwartz N; Brown KD; Park LR Otol Neurotol; 2020 Dec; 41(10):e1201-e1206. PubMed ID: 33433084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrode Location and Audiologic Performance After Cochlear Implantation: A Comparative Study Between Nucleus CI422 and CI512 Electrode Arrays. O'Connell BP; Hunter JB; Gifford RH; Rivas A; Haynes DS; Noble JH; Wanna GB Otol Neurotol; 2016 Sep; 37(8):1032-5. PubMed ID: 27525618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech Perception Outcomes for Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Using a Lateral Wall or Perimodiolar Array. Moran M; Vandali A; Briggs RJS; Dettman S; Cowan RSC; Dowell RC Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jun; 40(5):608-616. PubMed ID: 31083082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Insertion Depth and Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition Outcomes: A Comparative Study of 28- and 31.5-mm Lateral Wall Arrays. Canfarotta MW; Dillon MT; Brown KD; Pillsbury HC; Dedmon MM; O'Connell BP Otol Neurotol; 2022 Feb; 43(2):183-189. PubMed ID: 34772886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of age, electrode array, and time on cochlear implant impedances. Velandia S; Martinez D; Goncalves S; Pena S; Bas E; Ein L; Prentiss S; Telischi F; Angeli S; Dinh CT Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Nov; 21(6):344-352. PubMed ID: 32640889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Degree of modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation. Marrinan MS; Roland JT; Reitzen SD; Waltzman SB; Cohen LT; Cohen NL Otol Neurotol; 2004 May; 25(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 15129107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immediate and 1-Year Outcomes with a Slim Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode Array. Durakovic N; Kallogjeri D; Wick CC; McJunkin JL; Buchman CA; Herzog J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 May; 162(5):731-736. PubMed ID: 32180504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study of two different perimodiolar and a straight cochlear implant electrode array: surgical and audiological outcomes. Garaycochea O; Manrique-Huarte R; Lazaro C; Huarte A; Prieto C; Alvarez de Linera-Alperi M; Manrique M Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Jan; 277(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31637478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]