These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33711691)

  • 21. Evaluation of three rapid lateral flow antigen detection tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    Jääskeläinen AE; Ahava MJ; Jokela P; Szirovicza L; Pohjala S; Vapalahti O; Lappalainen M; Hepojoki J; Kurkela S
    J Clin Virol; 2021 Apr; 137():104785. PubMed ID: 33711694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficacy comparison of three rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 and how viral load impact their performance.
    Blairon L; Cupaiolo R; Thomas I; Piteüs S; Wilmet A; Beukinga I; Tré-Hardy M
    J Med Virol; 2021 Oct; 93(10):5783-5788. PubMed ID: 34050945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Performance evaluation of an automated SARS-CoV-2 Ag test for the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection on nasopharyngeal swabs.
    Hartard C; Berger S; Josse T; Schvoerer E; Jeulin H
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2021 Nov; 59(12):2003-2009. PubMed ID: 34331847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diagnostic Performance of an Antigen Test with RT-PCR for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a Hospital Setting - Los Angeles County, California, June-August 2020.
    Brihn A; Chang J; OYong K; Balter S; Terashita D; Rubin Z; Yeganeh N
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2021 May; 70(19):702-706. PubMed ID: 33983916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of the simultaneous conjunctiva and oropharynx-nasopharynx swab results in patients applying to the SARS-CoV-2 outpatient clinic for the first time.
    Gunduz A; Firat M; Turkoglu G
    J Med Virol; 2021 Jul; 93(7):4516-4522. PubMed ID: 33783859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Combined throat/nasal swab sampling for SARS-CoV-2 is equivalent to nasopharyngeal sampling.
    Vlek ALM; Wesselius TS; Achterberg R; Thijsen SFT
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2021 Jan; 40(1):193-195. PubMed ID: 32666481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rapid comparative evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests.
    Denzler A; Jacobs ML; Witte V; Schnitzler P; Denkinger CM; Knop M
    Infection; 2022 Oct; 50(5):1281-1293. PubMed ID: 35397099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the INDICAID COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test in Symptomatic Populations and Asymptomatic Community Testing.
    Chiu RYT; Kojima N; Mosley GL; Cheng KK; Pereira DY; Brobeck M; Chan TL; Zee JS; Kittur H; Chung CYT; Tsang E; Maran K; Yung RW; Leung AC; Siu RH; Ng JP; Choi TH; Fung MW; Chan WS; Lam HY; Lee KH; Parkin S; Chao FC; Ho SK; Marshak DR; Ma ES; Klausner JD
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Sep; 9(1):e0034221. PubMed ID: 34346748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical Evaluation of BD Veritor SARS-CoV-2 Point-of-Care Test Performance Compared to PCR-Based Testing and versus the Sofia 2 SARS Antigen Point-of-Care Test.
    Young S; Taylor SN; Cammarata CL; Varnado KG; Roger-Dalbert C; Montano A; Griego-Fullbright C; Burgard C; Fernandez C; Eckert K; Andrews JC; Ren H; Allen J; Ackerman R; Cooper CK
    J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Dec; 59(1):. PubMed ID: 33023911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Serial simultaneously self-swabbed samples from multiple sites show similarly decreasing SARS-CoV-2 loads in COVID-19 cases of differing clinical severity.
    Pan D; Sze S; Rogers B; Bron J; Bird PW; Holmes CW; Tang JW
    J Infect; 2020 Dec; 81(6):979-997. PubMed ID: 32956734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Are Posterior Oropharyngeal Saliva Specimens an Acceptable Alternative to Nasopharyngeal Sampling for the Monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in Primary-Care Settings?
    Masse S; Bonnet C; Vilcu AM; Benamar H; Swital M; van der Werf S; Carrat F; Hanslik T; Blanchon T; Falchi A
    Viruses; 2021 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 33926069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnostic performance of different sampling approaches for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tsang NNY; So HC; Ng KY; Cowling BJ; Leung GM; Ip DKM
    Lancet Infect Dis; 2021 Sep; 21(9):1233-1245. PubMed ID: 33857405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical performance evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing in point of care usage in comparison to RT-qPCR.
    Wagenhäuser I; Knies K; Rauschenberger V; Eisenmann M; McDonogh M; Petri N; Andres O; Flemming S; Gawlik M; Papsdorf M; Taurines R; Böhm H; Forster J; Weismann D; Weißbrich B; Dölken L; Liese J; Kurzai O; Vogel U; Krone M
    EBioMedicine; 2021 Jul; 69():103455. PubMed ID: 34186490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Field evaluation of COVID-19 antigen tests versus RNA based detection: Potential lower sensitivity compensated by immediate results, technical simplicity, and low cost.
    Matsuda EM; de Campos IB; de Oliveira IP; Colpas DR; Carmo AMDS; Brígido LFM
    J Med Virol; 2021 Jul; 93(7):4405-4410. PubMed ID: 33788270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay-based high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay for the diagnosis of COVID-19: The VITROS® SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test.
    Matsuzaki N; Orihara Y; Kodana M; Kitagawa Y; Matsuoka M; Kawamura R; Takeuchi S; Imai K; Tarumoto N; Maesaki S; Maeda T
    J Med Virol; 2021 Dec; 93(12):6778-6781. PubMed ID: 34170555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of Antigen Tests and qPCR in Rapid Diagnostics of Infections Caused by SARS-CoV-2 Virus.
    Klajmon A; Olechowska-Jarząb A; Salamon D; Sroka-Oleksiak A; Brzychczy-Włoch M; Gosiewski T
    Viruses; 2021 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 35062221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prospective study of 1308 nasopharyngeal swabs from 1033 patients using the LUMIPULSE SARS-CoV-2 antigen test: Comparison with RT-qPCR.
    Hirotsu Y; Maejima M; Shibusawa M; Amemiya K; Nagakubo Y; Hosaka K; Sueki H; Hayakawa M; Mochizuki H; Tsutsui T; Kakizaki Y; Miyashita Y; Omata M
    Int J Infect Dis; 2021 Apr; 105():7-14. PubMed ID: 33556612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection with the Cobas® 6800/8800 system on gargle samples using two sample processing methods with combined oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal swab.
    Benoit P; Labbé AC; Lalancette L; Gagnon S; Bonneau E; Lavallée C; Roger M; Fafard J; Dumaresq J; Beauchemin S; Coutlée F;
    J Med Virol; 2021 Dec; 93(12):6837-6840. PubMed ID: 34324212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Think of the Children: Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test in Pediatric Population.
    González-Donapetry P; García-Clemente P; Bloise I; García-Sánchez C; Sánchez Castellano MÁ; Romero MP; Gutiérrez Arroyo A; Mingorance J; de Ceano-Vivas La Calle M; García-Rodriguez J;
    Pediatr Infect Dis J; 2021 May; 40(5):385-388. PubMed ID: 33605674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid immunoassay for diagnosis of COVID-19 in the emergency department.
    Möckel M; Corman VM; Stegemann MS; Hofmann J; Stein A; Jones TC; Gastmeier P; Seybold J; Offermann R; Bachmann U; Lindner T; Bauer W; Drosten C; Rosen A; Somasundaram R
    Biomarkers; 2021 May; 26(3):213-220. PubMed ID: 33455451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 62.