BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33712289)

  • 1. Planned oocyte cryopreservation-10-15-year follow-up: return rates and cycle outcomes.
    Blakemore JK; Grifo JA; DeVore SM; Hodes-Wertz B; Berkeley AS
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Jun; 115(6):1511-1520. PubMed ID: 33712289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval.
    Doyle JO; Richter KS; Lim J; Stillman RJ; Graham JR; Tucker MJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):459-66.e2. PubMed ID: 26604065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A 10-year follow-up of reproductive outcomes in women attempting motherhood after elective oocyte cryopreservation.
    Loreti S; Darici E; Nekkebroeck J; Drakopoulos P; Van Landuyt L; De Munck N; Tournaye H; De Vos M
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Feb; 39(2):355-363. PubMed ID: 38145619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients.
    Goldman RH; Racowsky C; Farland LV; Munné S; Ribustello L; Fox JH
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):853-859. PubMed ID: 28166330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Leave the past behind: women's reproductive history shows no association with blastocysts' euploidy and limited association with live birth rates after euploid embryo transfers.
    Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Soscia D; Giancani A; Scepi E; Maggiulli R; Vaiarelli A; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Mar; 36(4):929-940. PubMed ID: 33608730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fifteen years of autologous oocyte thaw outcomes from a large university-based fertility center.
    Cascante SD; Blakemore JK; DeVore S; Hodes-Wertz B; Fino ME; Berkeley AS; Parra CM; McCaffrey C; Grifo JA
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Jul; 118(1):158-166. PubMed ID: 35597614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive value of cytoplasmic granulation patterns during in vitro fertilization in metaphase II oocytes: part II, donor oocyte cycles.
    Hu J; Molinari E; Darmon SK; Zhang L; Patrizio P; Barad DH; Gleicher N
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Nov; 116(5):1330-1340. PubMed ID: 34294452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-based outcomes after oocyte cryopreservation for donor oocyte in vitro fertilization and planned oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline.
    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Jul; 116(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 34148587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association of Fresh Embryo Transfers Compared With Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfers With Live Birth Rate Among Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Using Freshly Retrieved Donor Oocytes.
    Insogna IG; Lanes A; Lee MS; Ginsburg ES; Fox JH
    JAMA; 2021 Jan; 325(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 33433574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frozen eggs: national autologous oocyte thaw outcomes.
    Kawwass JF; Crawford S; Hipp HS
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Oct; 116(4):1077-1084. PubMed ID: 34303511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The number of oocytes associated with maximum cumulative live birth rates per aspiration depends on female age: a population study of 221 221 treatment cycles.
    Law YJ; Zhang N; Venetis CA; Chambers GM; Harris K
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1778-1787. PubMed ID: 31398253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What is the reproductive potential of day 7 euploid embryos?
    Hernandez-Nieto C; Lee JA; Slifkin R; Sandler B; Copperman AB; Flisser E
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1697-1706. PubMed ID: 31398251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diminished ovarian reserve and poor response to stimulation in patients <38 years old: a quantitative but not qualitative reduction in performance.
    Morin SJ; Patounakis G; Juneau CR; Neal SA; Scott RT; Seli E
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1489-1498. PubMed ID: 30010882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usage and cost-effectiveness of elective oocyte freezing: a retrospective observational study.
    Yang IJ; Wu MY; Chao KH; Wei SY; Tsai YY; Huang TC; Chen MJ; Chen SU
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2022 Aug; 20(1):123. PubMed ID: 35974356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two different oocyte vitrification methods: a prospective, paired study on the same genetic background and stimulation protocol.
    Pujol A; Zamora MJ; Obradors A; Garcia D; Rodriguez A; Vassena R
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):989-997. PubMed ID: 31116386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Delivery rate using cryopreserved oocytes is comparable to conventional in vitro fertilization using fresh oocytes: potential fertility preservation for female cancer patients.
    Grifo JA; Noyes N
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):391-6. PubMed ID: 19439285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Difference in birth weight of consecutive sibling singletons is not found in oocyte donation when comparing fresh versus frozen embryo replacements.
    Galliano D; Garrido N; Serra-Serra V; Pellicer A
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1411-8.e1-3. PubMed ID: 26363384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A major increase in oocyte cryopreservation cycles in the USA, Australia and New Zealand since 2010 is highlighted by younger women but a need for standardized data collection.
    Johnston M; Richings NM; Leung A; Sakkas D; Catt S
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Feb; 36(3):624-635. PubMed ID: 33367704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of the male factor on the clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection combined with preimplantation aneuploidy testing: observational longitudinal cohort study of 1,219 consecutive cycles.
    Mazzilli R; Cimadomo D; Vaiarelli A; Capalbo A; Dovere L; Alviggi E; Dusi L; Foresta C; Lombardo F; Lenzi A; Tournaye H; Alviggi C; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Dec; 108(6):961-972.e3. PubMed ID: 28985908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.