274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33712598)
1. Predicting gastric cancer outcome from resected lymph node histopathology images using deep learning.
Wang X; Chen Y; Gao Y; Zhang H; Guan Z; Dong Z; Zheng Y; Jiang J; Yang H; Wang L; Huang X; Ai L; Yu W; Li H; Dong C; Zhou Z; Liu X; Yu G
Nat Commun; 2021 Mar; 12(1):1637. PubMed ID: 33712598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection (R0) regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.
Alatengbaolide ; Lin D; Li Y; Xu H; Chen J; Wang B; Liu C; Lu P
Am J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 36(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 22547011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Survival benefit of greater number of lymph nodes dissection for advanced node-negative gastric cancer patients following radical gastrectomy.
He H; Shen Z; Wang X; Qin J; Sun Y; Qin X
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jan; 46(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 26497044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.
Kılıç MÖ; Gündoğdu SB; Özden S; Saylam B; Tez M
Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb; 118(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 28669280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel lymph node staging system for gastric cancer including modified Union for cancer Control/American Joint Committee on cancer and Japanese Gastric Cancer Association criteria.
Gong Y; Pan S; Wang X; Zhu G; Xu H; Zhu Z
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 46(10 Pt B):e27-e32. PubMed ID: 32631708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metastatic lymph node ratio in advanced gastric carcinoma: a better prognostic factor than number of metastatic lymph nodes?
Lee SY; Hwang I; Park YS; Gardner J; Ro JY
Int J Oncol; 2010 Jun; 36(6):1461-7. PubMed ID: 20428770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Significance of the absolute number and ratio of metastatic lymph nodes in predicting postoperative survival for the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA2 to IIA cervical cancer.
Chen Y; Zhang L; Tian J; Fu X; Ren X; Hao Q
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jan; 23(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 23221732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Use of Deep Learning-Based Computer Diagnostic Algorithm for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases of Gastric Adenocarcinoma.
Matsushima J; Sato T; Ohnishi T; Yoshimura Y; Mizutani H; Koto S; Ikeda JI; Kano M; Matsubara H; Hayashi H
Int J Surg Pathol; 2023 Sep; 31(6):975-981. PubMed ID: 35898183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic value of metastatic lymph node ratio as an additional tool to the TNM stage system in gastric cancer.
Wu XJ; Miao RL; Li ZY; Bu ZD; Zhang LH; Wu AW; Zong XL; Li SX; Shan F; Ji X; Ren H; Ji JF
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):927-33. PubMed ID: 25913059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the current AJCC-TNM numeric-based with a new anatomical location-based lymph node staging system for gastric cancer: A western experience.
Galizia G; Lieto E; Auricchio A; Cardella F; Mabilia A; Diana A; Castellano P; De Vita F; Orditura M
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0173619. PubMed ID: 28380037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of nodal micrometastasis in colorectal cancer using deep learning on annotation-free whole-slide images.
Chuang WY; Chen CC; Yu WH; Yeh CJ; Chang SH; Ueng SH; Wang TH; Hsueh C; Kuo CF; Yeh CY
Mod Pathol; 2021 Oct; 34(10):1901-1911. PubMed ID: 34103664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomical location of metastatic lymph nodes: an indispensable prognostic factor for gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection.
Zhao B; Zhang J; Zhang J; Chen X; Chen J; Wang Z; Xu H; Huang B
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):185-192. PubMed ID: 29228846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical significance of No.12 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer].
You X; Wang Y; Li W; Zhao X; Cheng Z; Xu N; Huang C; Liu G
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 20(3):283-288. PubMed ID: 28338161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Which Lymph Node Staging System Better Predicts Prognosis in Patients With Gastric Carcinoma? A Comparative Study Between 3 Different Lymph Node Classifications for Resected Gastric Cancer in a Western Tertiary Center.
Díaz Del Arco C; Estrada Muñoz L; Sánchez Pernaute A; Ortega Medina L; García Gómez de Las Heras S; García Martínez R; Fernández Aceñero MJ
Am J Clin Oncol; 2021 Jan; 44(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 33086233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph nodes ratio in patients with T2-T3 stage gastric cancer].
Feng RH; Zhu ZG; Yan M; Chen J; Xiang M; Yin HR; Lin YZ
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Sep; 10(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 17851782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Appraisal of a revised lymph node classification system for esophageal squamous cell cancer.
Dhar DK; Hattori S; Tonomoto Y; Shimoda T; Kato H; Tachibana M; Matsuura K; Mitsumoto Y; Little AG; Nagasue N
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Apr; 83(4):1265-72. PubMed ID: 17383324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colorectal cancer lymph node metastasis prediction with weakly supervised transformer-based multi-instance learning.
Tan L; Li H; Yu J; Zhou H; Wang Z; Niu Z; Li J; Li Z
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2023 Jun; 61(6):1565-1580. PubMed ID: 36809427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deep learning system for lymph node quantification and metastatic cancer identification from whole-slide pathology images.
Hu Y; Su F; Dong K; Wang X; Zhao X; Jiang Y; Li J; Ji J; Sun Y
Gastric Cancer; 2021 Jul; 24(4):868-877. PubMed ID: 33484355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proposal of a novel subclassification of pN3b for improvement the prognostic discrimination ability of gastric cancer patients.
Wang P; Deng J; Sun Z; Wang W; Wang Z; Xu H; Zhou Z; Liang H
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 46(10 Pt B):e20-e26. PubMed ID: 32713746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Metastatic lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer.
Rodríguez Santiago JM; Muñoz E; Martí M; Quintana S; Veloso E; Marco C
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2005 Feb; 31(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 15642427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
