These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33712818)

  • 1. MoBPSweb: A web-based framework to simulate and compare breeding programs.
    Pook T; Büttgen L; Ganesan A; Ha NT; Simianer H
    G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33712818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MoBPS - Modular Breeding Program Simulator.
    Pook T; Schlather M; Simianer H
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Jun; 10(6):1915-1918. PubMed ID: 32229505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A unifying concept of animal breeding programmes.
    Simianer H; Büttgen L; Ganesan A; Ha NT; Pook T
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2021 Mar; 138(2):137-150. PubMed ID: 33486850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AlphaSim: Software for Breeding Program Simulation.
    Faux AM; Gorjanc G; Gaynor RC; Battagin M; Edwards SM; Wilson DL; Hearne SJ; Gonen S; Hickey JM
    Plant Genome; 2016 Nov; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 27902803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AlphaSimR: an R package for breeding program simulations.
    Gaynor RC; Gorjanc G; Hickey JM
    G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33704430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimization Strategies to Adapt Sheep Breeding Programs to Pasture-Based Production Environments: A Simulation Study.
    Martin R; Pook T; Bennewitz J; Schmid M
    Animals (Basel); 2023 Nov; 13(22):. PubMed ID: 38003094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimization of breeding program design through stochastic simulation with kernel regression.
    Hassanpour A; Geibel J; Simianer H; Pook T
    G3 (Bethesda); 2023 Dec; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 37742059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SIMplyBee: an R package to simulate honeybee populations and breeding programs.
    Obšteter J; Strachan LK; Bubnič J; Prešern J; Gorjanc G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 May; 55(1):31. PubMed ID: 37161307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. QuLinePlus: extending plant breeding strategy and genetic model simulation to cross-pollinated populations-case studies in forage breeding.
    Hoyos-Villegas V; Arief VN; Yang WH; Sun M; DeLacy IH; Barrett BA; Jahufer Z; Basford KE
    Heredity (Edinb); 2019 May; 122(5):684-695. PubMed ID: 30368530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic Gain and Inbreeding from Genomic Selection in a Simulated Commercial Breeding Program for Perennial Ryegrass.
    Lin Z; Cogan NO; Pembleton LW; Spangenberg GC; Forster JW; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Plant Genome; 2016 Mar; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 27898764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of genomic information on optimal contribution selection in livestock breeding programs.
    Clark SA; Kinghorn BP; Hickey JM; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):44. PubMed ID: 24171942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the impact of natural service bulls and genotype by environment interactions on genetic gain and inbreeding in organic dairy cattle genomic breeding programs.
    Yin T; Wensch-Dorendorf M; Simianer H; Swalve HH; König S
    Animal; 2014 Jun; 8(6):877-86. PubMed ID: 24703184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Economic aspects of implementing genomic evaluations in a pig sire line breeding scheme.
    Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):40. PubMed ID: 24127883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simulation study of a honeybee breeding scheme accounting for polyandry, direct and maternal effects on colony performance.
    Kistler T; Basso B; Phocas F
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Sep; 53(1):71. PubMed ID: 34496761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. COANCESTRY: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 Jan; 11(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 21429111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retriever and Pointer: Software to Evaluate Inbreeding and Genetic Management in Captive Populations.
    Windig JJ; Hulsegge I
    Animals (Basel); 2021 May; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 34067200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic Breeding Programs Realize Larger Benefits by Cooperation in the Presence of Genotype × Environment Interaction Than Conventional Breeding Programs.
    Cao L; Liu H; Mulder HA; Henryon M; Thomasen JR; Kargo M; Sørensen AC
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():251. PubMed ID: 32373152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating the benefits and perils of importing genetic material in small cattle breeding programs via simulation.
    Obšteter J; Jenko J; Pocrnic I; Gorjanc G
    J Dairy Sci; 2023 Aug; 106(8):5593-5605. PubMed ID: 37474361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple-trait breeding values for parental selection in self-pollinating crops.
    Bauer AM; Léon J
    Theor Appl Genet; 2008 Jan; 116(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 17955207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.