BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33713172)

  • 1. Inter-reader reliability of CT Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System according to imaging analysis methodology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kang JH; Choi SH; Lee JS; Kim KW; Kim SY; Lee SS; Byun JH
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):6856-6867. PubMed ID: 33713172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter-reader reliability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: a meta-analysis.
    Kang JH; Choi SH; Lee JS; Kim DW; Jang JK
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Oct; 46(10):4671-4681. PubMed ID: 34156509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Discordance Between Computed Tomography and Gadoxetate-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Major Features.
    Chernyak V; Flusberg M; Law A; Kobi M; Paroder V; Rozenblit AM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(1):155-161. PubMed ID: 28806321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interreader Agreement of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System on MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Kang JH; Choi SH; Lee JS; Park SH; Kim KW; Kim SY; Lee SS; Byun JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Sep; 52(3):795-804. PubMed ID: 31984578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interreader Reliability of LI-RADS Version 2014 Algorithm and Imaging Features for Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Large International Multireader Study.
    Fowler KJ; Tang A; Santillan C; Bhargavan-Chatfield M; Heiken J; Jha RC; Weinreb J; Hussain H; Mitchell DG; Bashir MR; Costa EAC; Cunha GM; Coombs L; Wolfson T; Gamst AC; Brancatelli G; Yeh B; Sirlin CB
    Radiology; 2018 Jan; 286(1):173-185. PubMed ID: 29091751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rate of observation and inter-observer agreement for LI-RADS major features at CT and MRI in 184 pathology proven hepatocellular carcinomas.
    Ehman EC; Behr SC; Umetsu SE; Fidelman N; Yeh BM; Ferrell LD; Hope TA
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 May; 41(5):963-9. PubMed ID: 27193793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does quantitative assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout improve LI-RADS v2018-based classification of liver lesions?
    Stocker D; Becker AS; Barth BK; Skawran S; Kaniewska M; Fischer MA; Donati O; Reiner CS
    Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2922-2933. PubMed ID: 32020398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System:: Substantial Discordance Between CT and MR for Imaging Classification of Hepatic Nodules.
    Zhang YD; Zhu FP; Xu X; Wang Q; Wu CJ; Liu XS; Shi HB
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 26777590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CT/MRI and CEUS LI-RADS Major Features Association with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.
    van der Pol CB; McInnes MDF; Salameh JP; Levis B; Chernyak V; Sirlin CB; Bashir MR; Allen BC; Burke LMB; Choi JY; Choi SH; Forner A; Fraum TJ; Giamperoli A; Jiang H; Joo I; Kang Z; Kierans AS; Kang HJ; Khatri G; Kim JH; Kim MJ; Kim SY; Kim YY; Kwon H; Lee JM; Lewis SC; McGinty KA; Mulazzani L; Park MS; Piscaglia F; Podgórska J; Reiner CS; Ronot M; Rosiak G; Song B; Song JS; Tang A; Terzi E; Wang J; Wang W; Wilson SR; Yokoo T
    Radiology; 2022 Feb; 302(2):326-335. PubMed ID: 34783596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does Training in LI-RADS Version 2018 Improve Readers' Agreement with the Expert Consensus and Inter-reader Agreement in MRI Interpretation?
    Zhang N; Xu H; Ren AH; Zhang Q; Yang DW; Ba T; Wang ZC; Yang ZH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Dec; 54(6):1922-1934. PubMed ID: 33963801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter-reader agreement of CEUS LI-RADS among radiologists with different levels of experience.
    Li W; Li L; Zhuang BW; Ruan SM; Hu HT; Huang Y; Lin MX; Xie XY; Kuang M; Lu MD; Chen LD; Wang W
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):6758-6767. PubMed ID: 33675388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-arterial phase MRI depicts inconsistent arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) subtypes in liver observations of patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Cunha GM; Hasenstab KA; Delgado T; Ichikawa S; Lee MH; Dautt Medina PM; Kim SJ; Lee YH; Kwon H; Sirlin CB; Fowler KJ
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):7594-7604. PubMed ID: 33876298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Multicenter Assessment of Interreader Reliability of LI-RADS Version 2018 for MRI and CT.
    Hong CW; Chernyak V; Choi JY; Lee S; Potu C; Delgado T; Wolfson T; Gamst A; Birnbaum J; Kampalath R; Lall C; Lee JT; Owen JW; Aguirre DA; Mendiratta-Lala M; Davenport MS; Masch W; Roudenko A; Lewis SC; Kierans AS; Hecht EM; Bashir MR; Brancatelli G; Douek ML; Ohliger MA; Tang A; Cerny M; Fung A; Costa EA; Corwin MT; McGahan JP; Kalb B; Elsayes KM; Surabhi VR; Blair K; Marks RM; Horvat N; Best S; Ash R; Ganesan K; Kagay CR; Kambadakone A; Wang J; Cruite I; Bijan B; Goodwin M; Moura Cunha G; Tamayo-Murillo D; Fowler KJ; Sirlin CB
    Radiology; 2023 Jun; 307(5):e222855. PubMed ID: 37367445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What proportion of LI-RADS 5 observations reported in clinical practice do not meet LI-RADS 5 criteria?
    Ghadimi M; Birnbaum J; Kamel IR; Sirlin CB; Chernyak V
    Eur Radiol; 2022 May; 32(5):3327-3333. PubMed ID: 34807269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma in the explanted liver with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017.
    Seo N; Kim MS; Park MS; Choi JY; Do RKG; Han K; Kim MJ
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):261-271. PubMed ID: 31418085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increasing the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for diagnosis of small (10-19 mm) HCC on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Chen J; Kuang S; Zhang Y; Tang W; Xie S; Zhang L; Rong D; He B; Deng Y; Xiao Y; Shi W; Fowler K; Wang J; Sirlin CB
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Apr; 46(4):1530-1542. PubMed ID: 33040166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic Performance of CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2017 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lee S; Kim SS; Roh YH; Choi JY; Park MS; Kim MJ
    Liver Int; 2020 Jun; 40(6):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 32145134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. LI-RADS treatment response algorithm after first-line DEB-TACE: reproducibility and prognostic value at initial post-treatment CT/MRI.
    Pirasteh A; Sorra EA; Marquez H; Sibley RC; Fielding JR; Vij A; Rich NE; Arroyo A; Yopp AC; Khatri G; Singal AG; Yokoo T
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Aug; 46(8):3708-3716. PubMed ID: 33755735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. LI-RADS Major Features on MRI for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Shin J; Lee S; Yoon JK; Chung YE; Choi JY; Park MS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Aug; 54(2):518-525. PubMed ID: 33638582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of extracellular contrast versus gadoxetic acid in assessing small liver lesions using liver imaging reporting and data system v.2018 and European association for the study of the liver criteria.
    Rimola J; Sapena V; Brancatelli G; Darnell A; Forzenigo L; Mähringer-Kunz A; Paisant A; Renzulli M; Schima W; Terraz S; Valls C; Wagner M; Ayuso C; Vilgrain V; Reig M; Ronot M
    Hepatology; 2022 Nov; 76(5):1318-1328. PubMed ID: 35349760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.