112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33713944)
21. Outcomes of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens.
Kır G; Seneldir H; Gumus E
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2016 Feb; 20():48-51. PubMed ID: 26750655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Gleason Pattern 5 is a Possible Pathologic Predictor for Biochemical Recurrence after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.
Ikeda M; Amano N; Sakata Y; Honda T; Tachibana T; Hirano S; Yamashita H; Ishii J; Irie A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Mar; 20(3):783-788. PubMed ID: 30909685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model.
Taguchi S; Uemura Y; Fujimura T; Morikawa T; Naito A; Kawai T; Suzuki M; Kume H; Fukuhara H
BMC Cancer; 2020 May; 20(1):371. PubMed ID: 32357849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system.
Pierorazio PM; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 23464824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. PYGOPUS2 expression in prostatic adenocarcinoma is a potential risk stratification marker for PSA progression following radical prostatectomy.
Kao KR; Popadiuk P; Thoms J; Aoki S; Anwar S; Fitzgerald E; Andrews P; Voisey K; Gai L; Challa S; He Z; Gonzales-Aguirre P; Simmonds A; Popadiuk C
J Clin Pathol; 2018 May; 71(5):402-411. PubMed ID: 28924059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Value of perineural invasion in prostatectomy specimen in the assessment on tumor progression and prognosis].
Zhu YJ; Wang YQ; Pan JH; Dong BJ; Xu F; Sha JJ; Xue W; Huang YR
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 54(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 26932892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Primary Gleason pattern in biopsy Gleason score 7 is predictive of adverse histopathological features and biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy.
Berg KD; Røder MA; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
Scand J Urol; 2014 Apr; 48(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 23889119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A tertiary Gleason pattern in the prostatectomy specimen and its association with adverse outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Adam M; Hannah A; Budäus L; Steuber T; Salomon G; Michl U; Haese A; Fisch M; Wittmer C; Steurer S; Minner S; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Sauter G; Schlomm T; Isbarn H
J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 24518778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Relationship between primary Gleason pattern on needle biopsy and clinicopathologic outcomes among men with Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Gonzalgo ML; Bastian PJ; Mangold LA; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Partin AW
Urology; 2006 Jan; 67(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 16413345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. PanCD44 Immunohistochemical Evaluation in Prostatectomies from Patients with Adenocarcinoma.
Hirth CG; Dos Santos AM; de Cerqueira JBG; Jamacaru FVF; da Cunha MDPSS; Dornelas CA
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():2061268. PubMed ID: 29682524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Existence of pattern 5 on radical prostatectomy: poor prognostic factor associated with a lower biochemical recurrence-free survival].
Pastori J; Balssa L; Lillaz J; Guichard G; Chabannes E; Bernardini S; Bittard H; Thiery-Vuillemin A; Kleinclauss F
Prog Urol; 2014 Jun; 24(7):433-40. PubMed ID: 24861683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Well differentiated localized prostate carcinoma: prognostic relevance of tertiary Gleason pattern 4 and tumor volume].
Leite KR; Srougi M; Kauffmann JR; Bevilacqua RG; Nesrallah AJ; Nesrallah LJ; Camara-Lopes LH
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2005; 51(6):329-33. PubMed ID: 16444339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Usual and unusual histologic patterns of high Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy tissue.
Gottipati S; Warncke J; Vollmer R; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):900-7. PubMed ID: 22367295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence.
Corcoran NM; Hong MK; Casey RG; Hurtado-Coll A; Peters J; Harewood L; Goldenberg SL; Hovens CM; Costello AJ; Gleave ME
BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8 Pt 2):E202-10. PubMed ID: 21443656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis.
Ellis CL; Partin AW; Han M; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2068-73. PubMed ID: 23727307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Role of microvessel density in predicting recurrence in pathologic Stage T3 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Gettman MT; Pacelli A; Slezak J; Bergstralh EJ; Blute M; Zincke H; Bostwick DG
Urology; 1999 Sep; 54(3):479-85. PubMed ID: 10475358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
