These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33714049)

  • 1. The development of visuotactile congruency effects for sequences of events.
    O'Dowd A; Cooney SM; Sorgini F; O' Rourke E; Reilly RB; Newell FN; Hirst RJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2021 Jul; 207():105094. PubMed ID: 33714049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The selective effect of the image of a hand on visuotactile interactions as assessed by performance on the crossmodal congruency task.
    Igarashi Y; Kimura Y; Spence C; Ichihara S
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 17726605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Seeing an image of the hand affects performance on a crossmodal congruency task for sequences of events.
    O' Dowd A; Sorgini F; Newell FN
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Apr; 80():102900. PubMed ID: 32114256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating the spatial and temporal modulation of visuotactile interactions in older adults.
    Couth S; Gowen E; Poliakoff E
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1233-48. PubMed ID: 26449968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task.
    Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Spence C; Ichihara S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Feb; 124(2):190-208. PubMed ID: 16759624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multisensory Interference in Early Deaf Adults.
    Heimler B; Baruffaldi F; Bonmassar C; Venturini M; Pavani F
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2017 Oct; 22(4):422-433. PubMed ID: 28961871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Crossmodal learning of target-context associations: When would tactile context predict visual search?
    Chen S; Shi Z; Zang X; Zhu X; Assumpção L; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1682-1694. PubMed ID: 31845105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of the body on crossmodal interference effects between tactile and two-dimensional visual stimuli.
    Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Ichihara S
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 204(3):419-30. PubMed ID: 20577727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline: evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task.
    Holmes NP; Sanabria D; Calvert GA; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1077(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 16483553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The left-right reversed visual feedback of the hand affects multisensory interaction within peripersonal space.
    Mine D; Narumi T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jan; 86(1):285-294. PubMed ID: 37759149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multisensory temporal processing in own-body contexts: plausibility of hand ownership does not improve visuo-tactile asynchrony detection.
    Keys RT; Rich AN; Zopf R
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 May; 236(5):1431-1443. PubMed ID: 29546651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interactions of different body parts in peripersonal space: how vision of the foot influences tactile perception at the hand.
    Schicke T; Bauer F; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 192(4):703-15. PubMed ID: 18841353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vision and touch in ageing: crossmodal selective attention and visuotactile spatial interactions.
    Poliakoff E; Ashworth S; Lowe C; Spence C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 16098997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extending visual dominance over touch for input off the body.
    Hartcher-O'Brien J; Levitan C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Nov; 1362():48-55. PubMed ID: 20850418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual motion information modulates tactile roughness perception.
    Suzuishi Y; Hidaka S; Kuroki S
    Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13929. PubMed ID: 32811859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When vision influences the invisible distractor: tactile response compatibility effects require vision.
    Wesslein AK; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):763-74. PubMed ID: 24245501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task.
    Spence C; Pavani F; Maravita A; Holmes N
    J Physiol Paris; 2004; 98(1-3):171-89. PubMed ID: 15477031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect.
    Shore DI; Barnes ME; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 392(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 16213655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adapting the Crossmodal Congruency Task for Measuring the Limits of Visual-Tactile Interactions Within and Between Groups.
    Poole D; Couth S; Gowen E; Warren PA; Poliakoff E
    Multisens Res; 2015; 28(3-4):227-44. PubMed ID: 26288897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.