These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33714063)

  • 1. Application of surface complexation modeling on adsorption of uranium at water-solid interface: A review.
    Sun Y; Li Y
    Environ Pollut; 2021 Jun; 278():116861. PubMed ID: 33714063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertainty and variability in laboratory derived sorption parameters of sediments from a uranium in situ recovery site.
    Dangelmayr MA; Reimus PW; Johnson RH; Clay JT; Stone JJ
    J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Jun; 213():28-39. PubMed ID: 29691066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uranium(VI) adsorption and surface complexation modeling onto background sediments from the F-Area Savannah River Site.
    Dong W; Tokunaga TK; Davis JA; Wan J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Feb; 46(3):1565-71. PubMed ID: 22191402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Additive surface complexation modeling of uranium(VI) adsorption onto quartz-sand dominated sediments.
    Dong W; Wan J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jun; 48(12):6569-77. PubMed ID: 24865372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sorption of uranium (VI) on homoionic sodium smectite experimental study and surface complexation modeling.
    Korichi S; Bensmaili A
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Sep; 169(1-3):780-93. PubMed ID: 19428178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of surface area normalisation for interpreting distribution coefficients (K(d)) for uranium sorption.
    Payne TE; Brendler V; Comarmond MJ; Nebelung C
    J Environ Radioact; 2011 Oct; 102(10):888-95. PubMed ID: 20452709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potential for U sequestration with select minerals and sediments via base treatment.
    Emerson HP; Di Pietro S; Katsenovich Y; Szecsody J
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Oct; 223():108-114. PubMed ID: 29908396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uranium release from sediment to groundwater: influence of water chemistry and insights into release mechanisms.
    Alam MS; Cheng T
    J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Aug; 164():72-87. PubMed ID: 24954631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uranium transport in a crushed granodiorite: experiments and reactive transport modeling.
    Dittrich TM; Reimus PW
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015; 175-176():44-59. PubMed ID: 25727688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying key controls on the behavior of an acidic-U(VI) plume in the Savannah River Site using reactive transport modeling.
    Bea SA; Wainwright H; Spycher N; Faybishenko B; Hubbard SS; Denham ME
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Aug; 151():34-54. PubMed ID: 23707874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adsorption of uranium(VI) to manganese oxides: X-ray absorption spectroscopy and surface complexation modeling.
    Wang Z; Lee SW; Catalano JG; Lezama-Pacheco JS; Bargar JR; Tebo BM; Giammar DE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(2):850-8. PubMed ID: 23227949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enthalpy of Uranium Adsorption onto Hematite.
    Estes SL; Powell BA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Dec; 54(23):15004-15012. PubMed ID: 33166114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of aluminum, uranium, and co-contaminants precipitation and adsorption during titration of acidic sediments.
    Tang G; Luo W; Watson DB; Brooks SC; Gu B
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jun; 47(11):5787-93. PubMed ID: 23641798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. U(VI) adsorption on aquifer sediments at the Hanford Site.
    Um W; Serne RJ; Brown CF; Last GV
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):255-69. PubMed ID: 17499879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of acidic and alkaline waste solution properties on uranium migration in subsurface sediments.
    Szecsody JE; Truex MJ; Qafoku NP; Wellman DM; Resch T; Zhong L
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Aug; 151():155-75. PubMed ID: 23851265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of solid-to-solution ratio on uranium(VI) adsorption and its implications.
    Cheng T; Barnett MO; Roden EE; Zhuang J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 May; 40(10):3243-7. PubMed ID: 16749688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eu(III) and Am(III) adsorption on aluminum (hydr)oxide minerals: surface complexation modeling.
    Satpathy A; Hixon AE
    Geochem Trans; 2023 Jun; 24(1):2. PubMed ID: 37340139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulating uranium sorption onto inorganic particles: The effect of redox potential.
    Degueldre C; McGowan S
    J Environ Radioact; 2020 Dec; 225():106408. PubMed ID: 33032004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complexation by Organic Matter Controls Uranium Mobility in Anoxic Sediments.
    Bone SE; Cliff J; Weaver K; Takacs CJ; Roycroft S; Fendorf S; Bargar JR
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Feb; 54(3):1493-1502. PubMed ID: 31886668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Establishing a geochemical heterogeneity model for a contaminated vadose zone--aquifer system.
    Murray CJ; Zachara JM; McKinley JP; Ward A; Bott YJ; Draper K; Moore D
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Oct; 153():122-40. PubMed ID: 23664489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.