231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33714229)
1. Out-of-field dose assessment for a 1.5 T MR-Linac with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters.
Zhang Y; Yan S; Cui Z; Wang Y; Li Z; Yin Y; Li B; Quan H; Zhu J
Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 48(7):4027-4037. PubMed ID: 33714229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of surface dose in an MR-Linac with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters for IMRT beam geometries.
Lim-Reinders S; Keller BM; Sahgal A; Chugh B; Kim A
Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):3133-3142. PubMed ID: 32302010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surface and near-surface dose measurements at beam entry and exit in a 1.5 T MR-Linac using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters.
Kim A; Lim-Reinders S; Ahmad SB; Sahgal A; Keller BM
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Feb; 65(4):045012. PubMed ID: 31860896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose-response dependencies of OSL dosimeters in conventional linacs and 1.5T MR-linacs: an experimental and Monte Carlo study.
Episkopakis A; Margaroni V; Kanellopoulou S; Marinos N; Koutsouveli E; Karaiskos P; Pappas EP
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Nov; 68(22):. PubMed ID: 37857285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric evaluation of irradiation geometry and potential air gaps in an acrylic miniphantom used for external audit of absolute dose calibration for a hybrid 1.5 T MR-linac system.
Tyagi N; Subashi E; Michael Lovelock D; Kry S; Alvarez PE; Hunt MA; Lim SB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 23(2):e13503. PubMed ID: 34914175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo dosimetry with optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, OSLDs, compared to diodes; the effects of buildup cap thickness and fabrication material.
Jursinic PA; Yahnke CJ
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5432-40. PubMed ID: 21992362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of OSLD and a treatment planning system for surface dose determination in IMRT treatments.
Zhuang AH; Olch AJ
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081720. PubMed ID: 25086530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Out-of-field mean photon energy and dose from 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams measured with TLD-300 and TLD-100 dosimeters.
López-Guadalupe VM; Rodríguez-Laguna A; Poitevin-Chacón MA; López-Pineda E; Brandan ME
Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):6567-6577. PubMed ID: 34528262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigation of backscatter factor in medical radiography using anthropomorphic phantom by optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter.
Arimoto A; Asada Y
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Sep; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 34438389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence detectors and high-sensitivity MCP-N thermoluminescent detectors in the 40-300 kVp energy range.
Poirier Y; Kuznetsova S; Villarreal-Barajas JE
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):402-413. PubMed ID: 29164632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal dose estimation for Virtual Tangential-fields Arc Therapy whole breast irradiation by optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters.
Dusi F; Guida F; Garcia ENV; Rossato MA; Germani A; Sapignoli S; Scaggion A; Scott A; Zorz A; Paiusco M
Phys Med; 2022 Sep; 101():44-49. PubMed ID: 35944444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of measured and treatment planning system out-of-field dose for a 1.5 T MR linac.
Powers M; Baines J
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Oct; 68(20):. PubMed ID: 37699399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Al
Christensen JB; Togno M; Nesteruk KP; Psoroulas S; Meer D; Weber DC; Lomax T; Yukihara EG; Safai S
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Apr; 66(8):. PubMed ID: 33571973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Out-of-field dose and its constituent components for a 1.5 T MR-Linac.
Yang B; Tang KK; Huang CY; Geng H; Lam WW; Wong YS; Tse MY; Lau KK; Cheung KY; Yu SK
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Nov; 66(22):. PubMed ID: 34700308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigating the effect of a magnetic field on dose distributions at phantom-air interfaces using PRESAGE
Costa F; Doran SJ; Hanson IM; Nill S; Billas I; Shipley D; Duane S; Adamovics J; Oelfke U
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(5):05NT01. PubMed ID: 29393066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electron streaming dose measurements and calculations on a 1.5 T MR-Linac.
Patterson E; Powers M; Metcalfe PE; Cutajar D; Oborn BM; Baines JA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Apr; ():e14370. PubMed ID: 38661097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement validation of treatment planning for a MR-Linac.
Chen X; Paulson ES; Ahunbay E; Sanli A; Klawikowski S; Li XA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):28-38. PubMed ID: 31254376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose calculation accuracy in proximity of a pacemaker: A multicenter study with threecommercial treatment planning systems.
Delana A; Barbareschi A; Consorti R; Daniela Falco M
Phys Med; 2020 Dec; 80():201-208. PubMed ID: 33190076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Commissioning optically stimulated luminescence in vivo dosimeters for fast neutron therapy.
Young LA; Yang F; Woodworth D; McCormick Z; Sandison G
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):314. PubMed ID: 26745925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation dose measurements in a dental orthopantogram unit using indigenously developed optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters.
Kumar P; Dutt Sharma S; Chandola RM; Mishra DR; Dhabekar B; Rawat NS; Kadam S; Agrawal S
Luminescence; 2019 Jun; 34(4):444-449. PubMed ID: 31025441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
