BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33715033)

  • 1. Prospective comparison of
    Malaspina S; Anttinen M; Taimen P; Jambor I; Sandell M; Rinta-Kiikka I; Kajander S; Schildt J; Saukko E; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Dean PB; Sequeiros RB; Aronen HJ; Kemppainen J; Seppänen M; Boström PJ; Ettala O
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Aug; 48(9):2951-2959. PubMed ID: 33715033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Prospective Comparison of
    Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lymph node staging with fluorine-18 prostate specific membrane antigen 1007-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in newly diagnosed intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer using histopathological evaluation of extended pelvic node dissection as reference.
    Hermsen R; Wedick EBC; Vinken MJM; van Kalmthout LWM; Küsters-Vandevelde HVN; Wijers CHW; Somford DM; van Basten JA
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Sep; 49(11):3929-3937. PubMed ID: 35543733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic Accuracy of
    Sprute K; Kramer V; Koerber SA; Meneses M; Fernandez R; Soza-Ried C; Eiber M; Weber WA; Rauscher I; Rahbar K; Schaefers M; Watabe T; Uemura M; Naka S; Nonomura N; Hatazawa J; Schwab C; Schütz V; Hohenfellner M; Holland-Letz T; Debus J; Kratochwil C; Amaral H; Choyke PL; Haberkorn U; Sandoval C; Giesel FL
    J Nucl Med; 2021 Feb; 62(2):208-213. PubMed ID: 32817141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How accurate is
    Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In primary lymph nodal staging of patients with high-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, how critical is the role of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography?
    Kulkarni SC; Sundaram PS; Padma S
    Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Feb; 41(2):139-146. PubMed ID: 31714366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pelvic lymph-node staging with
    Jansen BHE; Bodar YJL; Zwezerijnen GJC; Meijer D; van der Voorn JP; Nieuwenhuijzen JA; Wondergem M; Roeleveld TA; Boellaard R; Hoekstra OS; van Moorselaar RJA; Oprea-Lager DE; Vis AN
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Feb; 48(2):509-520. PubMed ID: 32789599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Compared with Conventional Imaging for Initial Staging of Treatment-naïve Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Single-center Study.
    Lenis AT; Pooli A; Lec PM; Sadun TY; Johnson DC; Lebacle C; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Czernin J; Reiter RE; Calais J
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 5(5):544-552. PubMed ID: 32958451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incremental Impact of [
    Szigeti F; Schweighofer-Zwink G; Meissnitzer M; Hauser-Kronberger C; Hitzl W; Kunit T; Forstner R; Pirich C; Beheshti M
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Feb; 24(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 34519966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Head-to-Head Comparison of
    Exterkate L; Hermsen R; Küsters-Vandevelde HVN; Prette JF; Baas DJH; Somford DM; van Basten JA
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 6(6):574-581. PubMed ID: 37230883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard.
    Stabile A; Pellegrino A; Mazzone E; Cannoletta D; de Angelis M; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Raggi D; Necchi A; Karakiewicz P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 34538770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lymph node staging with 68Ga-PSMA PET in patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer suitable for radical prostatectomy managed in a prostate cancer unit.
    Maestroni UV; Campobasso D; Guarino G; Acampora A; Scarlattei M; Ziglioli F; Dinale F; Baldari G; Migliari S; Gasparro D; Ferretti S; Silini EM; Ruffini L
    Chin Clin Oncol; 2023 Jun; 12(3):22. PubMed ID: 37417288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Staging of neuroendocrine tumours: comparison of [⁶⁸Ga]DOTATOC multiphase PET/CT and whole-body MRI.
    Schraml C; Schwenzer NF; Sperling O; Aschoff P; Lichy MP; Müller M; Brendle C; Werner MK; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg C
    Cancer Imaging; 2013 Mar; 13(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 23466785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Head-to-Head Comparison of
    Kuten J; Fahoum I; Savin Z; Shamni O; Gitstein G; Hershkovitz D; Mabjeesh NJ; Yossepowitch O; Mishani E; Even-Sapir E
    J Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 61(4):527-532. PubMed ID: 31562225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Head-to-head Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging Modalities for Initial Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Chow KM; So WZ; Lee HJ; Lee A; Yap DWT; Takwoingi Y; Tay KJ; Tuan J; Thang SP; Lam W; Yuen J; Lawrentschuk N; Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Chen K
    Eur Urol; 2023 Jul; 84(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 37032189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for Pelvic Nodal Metastasis Detection Prior to Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial.
    Hope TA; Eiber M; Armstrong WR; Juarez R; Murthy V; Lawhn-Heath C; Behr SC; Zhang L; Barbato F; Ceci F; Farolfi A; Schwarzenböck SM; Unterrainer M; Zacho HD; Nguyen HG; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR; Reiter RE; Holden S; Herrmann K; Zhu S; Fendler WP; Czernin J; Calais J
    JAMA Oncol; 2021 Nov; 7(11):1635-1642. PubMed ID: 34529005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Primary lymph-node staging with
    Corona-Montes VE; González-Cuenca E; Fernández-Noyola G; Olarte-Casas MA; Bobadilla-Salazar D; Medrano-Urtecho HM; Asimakopoulos AD
    Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):494.e1-494.e6. PubMed ID: 33223371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for staging of high-risk prostate cancer68Ga-PSMA PET and MRI in prostate cancer.
    Tulsyan S; Das CJ; Tripathi M; Seth A; Kumar R; Bal C
    Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Dec; 38(12):1094-1102. PubMed ID: 28957842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    Metser U; Berlin A; Halankar J; Murphy G; Jhaveri KS; Ghai S; Tau N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Mar; 210(3):635-640. PubMed ID: 29323548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.