172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33718060)
1. Diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectroscopy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park JJ; Kim DK; Lee S; Choi Y; Kim YH; Lee JH; Kim KH; Kim JH
Transl Androl Urol; 2021 Feb; 10(2):574-583. PubMed ID: 33718060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hao J; Chen C; Jin H; Chen N; Zhou J; Zhu Y; Chung K; Pu Q
Transl Cancer Res; 2020 Aug; 9(8):4750-4761. PubMed ID: 35117838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen C; Hao J; Hao X; Xu W; Xiao C; Zhang J; Pu Q; Liu L
Transl Cancer Res; 2021 Aug; 10(8):3680-3693. PubMed ID: 35116669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in discrimination of nasopharyngeal carcinoma from normal samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li Y; Su S; Zhang Y; Liu S; Jin H; Zeng Q; Cheng L
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2019 Jul; 145(7):1811-1821. PubMed ID: 31089798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The accuracy of Fiber-Optic Raman Spectroscopy in the detection and diagnosis of head and neck neoplasm
Chen W; Chen Y; Wu C; Zhang X; Huang X
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16536. PubMed ID: 38099303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Han R; Lin N; Huang J; Ma X
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():925032. PubMed ID: 35992884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectroscopy for the diagnosis of bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim DK; Kim YH; Lee HY; Lee S; Doo SW; Yang WJ; Song YS; Kim KH; Kim JH
J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(2):426-433. PubMed ID: 34121688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MicroRNA-21 and microRNA-30c as diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.
Zhou H; Zhu X
Cancer Manag Res; 2019; 11():2039-2050. PubMed ID: 30881128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of Raman Spectroscopy in the Diagnosis of Uterine Cervical Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis.
Shen ZW; Zhang LJ; Shen ZY; Zhang ZF; Xu F; Zhang X; Li R; Xiao Z
Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():828346. PubMed ID: 35602511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Diagnostic accuracy of artery peak velocity variation measured by bedside real-time ultrasound for prediction of fluid responsiveness: a Meta-analysis].
Pei Y; Yang Y; Feng Y; He S; Zhou J; Jiang H; Wang X
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2020 Jan; 32(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 32148240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic Performance of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for the Detection of Bladder Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Wu J; Wang YC; Luo WJ; Dai B; Ye DW; Zhu YP
Urol Int; 2020; 104(7-8):523-532. PubMed ID: 32554957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Micro-Ultrasound Imaging for Accuracy of Diagnosis in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
Zhang M; Wang R; Wu Y; Jing J; Chen S; Zhang G; Xu B; Liu C; Chen M
Front Oncol; 2019; 9():1368. PubMed ID: 31921633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by Raman spectroscopy provides high efficiency: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jin H; Zhang M; Huang L; Hao J; Zhou L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jan; 100(1):e23900. PubMed ID: 33429751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of Vibrational spectroscopy in the diagnosis of oral potentially malignant and malignant disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shrivastava PK; Kumar A; Aggarwal Y; Kumar A; Agrawal A; Rai A
J Cancer Res Ther; 2023; 19(2):151-158. PubMed ID: 37313896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity and specificity of optical coherence tomography angiography in the diagnosis of active choroidal neovascularization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang M; Gao S; Zhang Y; Zhang M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; 259(12):3529-3536. PubMed ID: 34110450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative assessment of the diagnostic role of mucin family members in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.
Wang S; You L; Dai M; Zhao Y
Ann Transl Med; 2021 Feb; 9(3):192. PubMed ID: 33708819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic value of circulating microRNAs for nasopharyngeal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang Z; Chen W; Zhang Y; Xu L; Wang Q
J Cancer Res Ther; 2014 Nov; 10 Suppl():C173-8. PubMed ID: 25450278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Diagnostic value of optical imaging combined with indocyanine green-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis].
He MF; Jiang ZW; Hao ZW; An J; Zhai J; Shen JK
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1196-1204. PubMed ID: 31874538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The diagnostic accuracy of HE4 in lung cancer: a meta-analysis.
Cheng D; Sun Y; He H
Dis Markers; 2015; 2015():352670. PubMed ID: 25873748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosis and prognosis of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin for acute kidney injury with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang A; Cai Y; Wang PF; Qu JN; Luo ZC; Chen XD; Huang B; Liu Y; Huang WQ; Wu J; Yin YH
Crit Care; 2016 Feb; 20():41. PubMed ID: 26880194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
