These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33718518)

  • 41. Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm.
    Solomon J; Lyu P; Marin D; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3961-3971. PubMed ID: 32506661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Implementation of Statistically-Based Image Reconstruction Algorithms for CT and Numerical Evaluation of Image Quality].
    Shinohara H; Hashimoto T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2018; 38(2):48-57. PubMed ID: 30381712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. CT dose and image quality in the last three scanner generations.
    Christe A; Heverhagen J; Ozdoba C; Weisstanner C; Ulzheimer S; Ebner L
    World J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 5(11):421-9. PubMed ID: 24349646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Feasible Dose Reduction in Routine Chest Computed Tomography Maintaining Constant Image Quality Using the Last Three Scanner Generations: From Filtered Back Projection to Sinogram-affirmed Iterative Reconstruction and Impact of the Novel Fully Integrated Detector Design Minimizing Electronic Noise.
    Ebner L; Knobloch F; Huber A; Landau J; Ott D; Heverhagen JT; Christe A
    J Clin Imaging Sci; 2014; 4():38. PubMed ID: 25161807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Image Noise, CNR, and Detectability of Low-Contrast, Low-Attenuation Liver Lesions in a Phantom: Effects of Radiation Exposure, Phantom Size, Integrated Circuit Detector, and Iterative Reconstruction.
    Goenka AH; Herts BR; Dong F; Obuchowski NA; Primak AN; Karim W; Baker ME
    Radiology; 2016 Aug; 280(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 26937709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Calibration of coronary calcium scores determined using iterative image reconstruction (AIDR 3D) at 120, 100, and 80 kVp.
    Blobel J; Mews J; Goatman KA; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1921. PubMed ID: 27036588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in quantifying coronary calcium.
    Takahashi M; Kimura F; Umezawa T; Watanabe Y; Ogawa H
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 26276567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
    Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of image quality and radiation dose in a phantom study.
    Park HJ; Choi SY; Lee JE; Lim S; Lee MH; Yi BH; Cha JG; Min JH; Lee B; Jung Y
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Jun; 32(6):3974-3984. PubMed ID: 35064803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Influence of dose reduction and iterative reconstruction on CT calcium scores: a multi-manufacturer dynamic phantom study.
    van der Werf NR; Willemink MJ; Willems TP; Greuter MJW; Leiner T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jun; 33(6):899-914. PubMed ID: 28102510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of image quality between spectral photon-counting CT and dual-layer CT for the evaluation of lung nodules: a phantom study.
    Si-Mohamed SA; Greffier J; Miailhes J; Boccalini S; Rodesch PA; Vuillod A; van der Werf N; Dabli D; Racine D; Rotzinger D; Becce F; Yagil Y; Coulon P; Vlassenbroek A; Boussel L; Beregi JP; Douek P
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Jan; 32(1):524-532. PubMed ID: 34185147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Image quality of ct angiography using model-based iterative reconstruction in infants with congenital heart disease: Comparison with filtered back projection and hybrid iterative reconstruction.
    Jia Q; Zhuang J; Jiang J; Li J; Huang M; Liang C
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 86():190-197. PubMed ID: 28027746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Performance evaluation of iterative reconstruction algorithms for achieving CT radiation dose reduction - a phantom study.
    Dodge CT; Tamm EP; Cody DD; Liu X; Jensen CT; Wei W; Kundra V; Rong XJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):511-531. PubMed ID: 27074454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Increasing iterative reconstruction strength at low tube voltage in coronary CT angiography protocols using 3D-printed and Catphan
    Abdullah KA; McEntee MF; Reed WM; Kench PL
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 21(9):209-214. PubMed ID: 32657493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Dual-dictionary learning-based iterative image reconstruction for spectral computed tomography application.
    Zhao B; Ding H; Lu Y; Wang G; Zhao J; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Dec; 57(24):8217-29. PubMed ID: 23192234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Incident Photon Number and Reconstructed Linear Attenuation Coefficients in Iterative CT Image Reconstruction].
    Shinohara H; Hashimoto T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2019; 38(4):143-158. PubMed ID: 30828046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Intra-individual comparison of coronary calcium scoring between photon counting detector- and energy integrating detector-CT: Effects on risk reclassification.
    Wolf EV; Halfmann MC; Schoepf UJ; Zsarnoczay E; Fink N; Griffith JP; Aquino GJ; Willemink MJ; O'Doherty J; Hell MM; Suranyi P; Kabakus IM; Baruah D; Varga-Szemes A; Emrich T
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():1053398. PubMed ID: 36741832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Volumetric quantification of lung nodules in CT with iterative reconstruction (ASiR and MBIR).
    Chen B; Barnhart H; Richard S; Robins M; Colsher J; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111902. PubMed ID: 24320435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Noise-resolution tradeoffs in x-ray CT imaging: a comparison of penalized alternating minimization and filtered backprojection algorithms.
    Evans JD; Politte DG; Whiting BR; O'Sullivan JA; Williamson JF
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1444-58. PubMed ID: 21520856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Impact of Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction on Agatston Coronary Artery Calcium Scores in Comparison to Filtered Back Projection in Native Cardiac CT.
    Obmann VC; Klink T; Heverhagen JT; Stork A; Laqmani A; Adam G; Begemann PG
    Rofo; 2015 May; 187(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 25962672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.