182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33719142)
1. Validated specialty-specific models for multi-disciplinary microsurgery training laboratories: a systematic review.
Crouch G; Wong G; Hong J; Varey A; Haddad R; Wang ZZ; Wykes J; Koutalistras N; Clark JR; Solomon M; Bannon P; McBride KE; Ch'ng S
ANZ J Surg; 2021 Jun; 91(6):1110-1116. PubMed ID: 33719142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Current Status of Simulation in Otolaryngology: A Systematic Review.
Musbahi O; Aydin A; Al Omran Y; Skilbeck CJ; Ahmed K
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(2):203-215. PubMed ID: 27839694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Current status of simulation and training models in microsurgery: A systematic review.
Javid P; Aydın A; Mohanna PN; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
Microsurgery; 2019 Oct; 39(7):655-668. PubMed ID: 31513303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonbiological Microsurgery Simulators in Plastic Surgery Training: A Systematic Review.
Abi-Rafeh J; Zammit D; Mojtahed Jaberi M; Al-Halabi B; Thibaudeau S
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Sep; 144(3):496e-507e. PubMed ID: 31461050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of Tabletop Microscopes for Microsurgery Simulation and Training.
Best DL; Ruggiero BL; Bonine BF; Troost JP; Moe JS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Sep; 80(9):1564-1572. PubMed ID: 35714723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Quality of Systematic Reviews in Head and Neck Microsurgery: A Perspective from Plastic Surgery and Otolaryngology.
Sun BJ; Tijerina J; Nazerali RS; Lee GK
Ann Plast Surg; 2018 May; 80(5S Suppl 5):S267-S273. PubMed ID: 29489536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microsurgery Training in the Digital Era: A Systematic Review of Accessible Digital Resources.
Margulies IG; Xu H; Henderson PW
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Oct; 85(4):337-343. PubMed ID: 31923014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. No Microscope? No Problem: A Systematic Review of Microscope-Free Microsurgery Training Models.
Chen J; Xun H; Abousy M; Long C; Sacks JM
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2022 Feb; 38(2):106-114. PubMed ID: 34425592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evolution of an evidence-based supermicrosurgery simulation training curriculum: A systematic review.
Pafitanis G; Narushima M; Yamamoto T; Raveendran M; Veljanoski D; Ghanem AM; Myers S; Koshima I
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Jul; 71(7):976-988. PubMed ID: 29773411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. International microsurgery simulation society (IMSS) consensus statement on the minimum standards for a basic microsurgery course, requirements for a microsurgical anastomosis global rating scale and minimum thresholds for training.
Ghanem A; Kearns M; Ballestín A; Froschauer S; Akelina Y; Shurey S; Legagneux J; Ramachandran S; Cozzolino S; Ramakrishnan V; Pafitanis G; Zakaria Y; Al-Maaytah K; Komatsu S; Kimata Y; Cifuentes I; Soucacos PN; Tos P; Myers S
Injury; 2020 Dec; 51 Suppl 4():S126-S130. PubMed ID: 32063338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nontechnical Skills in Surgery: A Systematic Review of Current Training Modalities.
Ounounou E; Aydin A; Brunckhorst O; Khan MS; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 30122636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Twelve tips for postgraduate or undergraduate medics building a basic microsurgery simulation training course.
Mason KA; Theodorakopoulou E; Pafitanis G; Ghanem AM; Myers SR
Med Teach; 2016 Sep; 38(9):872-8. PubMed ID: 27071862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microvascular anastomosis simulation using a chicken thigh model: Interval versus massed training.
Schoeff S; Hernandez B; Robinson DJ; Jameson MJ; Shonka DC
Laryngoscope; 2017 Nov; 127(11):2490-2494. PubMed ID: 28407264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Current Status of Simulation and Training Models in Urological Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Aydin A; Shafi AM; Shamim Khan M; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
J Urol; 2016 Aug; 196(2):312-20. PubMed ID: 27016463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simulation-Based Training Models for Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review.
Aydın A; Baig U; Al-Jabir A; Sarıca K; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
J Endourol; 2021 Jul; 35(7):1098-1117. PubMed ID: 33198492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Defining Standards in Experimental Microsurgical Training: Recommendations of the European Society for Surgical Research (ESSR) and the International Society for Experimental Microsurgery (ISEM).
Tolba RH; Czigány Z; Osorio Lujan S; Oltean M; Axelsson M; Akelina Y; Di Cataldo A; Miko I; Furka I; Dahmen U; Kobayashi E; Ionac M; Nemeth N
Eur Surg Res; 2017; 58(5-6):246-262. PubMed ID: 28746936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence-based microsurgical skill-acquisition series part 1: validated microsurgical models--a systematic review.
Dumestre D; Yeung JK; Temple-Oberle C
J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 24797848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Status of Microsurgical Simulation Training in Plastic Surgery: A Survey of United States Program Directors.
Al-Bustani S; Halvorson EG
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jun; 76(6):713-6. PubMed ID: 26418797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Training Modalities in Robot-assisted Urologic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Lovegrove CE; Elhage O; Khan MS; Novara G; Mottrie A; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
Eur Urol Focus; 2017 Feb; 3(1):102-116. PubMed ID: 28720354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current Status of Simulation-based Training Tools in Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Morgan M; Aydin A; Salih A; Robati S; Ahmed K
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(4):698-716. PubMed ID: 28188003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
