These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33719538)

  • 1. Examining the Relationship Between Speech Recognition and a Spectral-Temporal Test With a Mixed Group of Hearing Aid and Cochlear Implant Users.
    Aronoff JM; Duitsman L; Matusik DK; Hussain S; Lippmann E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Mar; 64(3):1073-1080. PubMed ID: 33719538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test With the Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Lawler M; Yu J; Aronoff JM
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):760-766. PubMed ID: 28957975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spectral-temporally modulated ripple test Lite for computeRless Measurement (SLRM): A Nonlinguistic Test for Audiology Clinics.
    Landsberger DM; Stupak N; Aronoff JM
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1253-1255. PubMed ID: 30870239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study.
    Kelsall D; Lupo J; Biever A
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(1):102773. PubMed ID: 33161258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth and Configuration of Hearing Loss on Bimodal Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Neuman AC; Zeman A; Neukam J; Wang B; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):621-635. PubMed ID: 30067559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise, and Health Related Quality of Life.
    Sladen DP; Carlson ML; Dowling BP; Olund AP; DeJong MD; Breneman A; Hollander S; Beatty CW; Neff BA; Driscoll CL
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jun; 39(5):576-581. PubMed ID: 29683995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochlear Implant Qualification in Noise Versus Quiet: Do Patients Demonstrate Similar Postoperative Benefits?
    Schauwecker N; Patro A; Holder JT; Bennett ML; Perkins E; Moberly AC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 May; 170(5):1411-1420. PubMed ID: 38353294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Older Individuals Meeting Medicare Cochlear Implant Candidacy Criteria in Noise but Not in Quiet: Are These Patients Improved by Surgery?
    Mudery JA; Francis R; McCrary H; Jacob A
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Feb; 38(2):187-191. PubMed ID: 27832005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benefits of a Hearing Registry: Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Quiet Versus Noise in 1,611 Patients.
    Dunn C; Miller SE; Schafer EC; Silva C; Gifford RH; Grisel JJ
    Am J Audiol; 2020 Dec; 29(4):851-861. PubMed ID: 32966101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive Ability of First-Side Cochlear Implant Performance in Adult Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation.
    Quimby AE; Wen CZ; Bigelow DC; Ruckenstein MJ; Brant JA
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Feb; 44(2):141-147. PubMed ID: 36624591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and validation of the pediatric AzBio sentence lists.
    Spahr AJ; Dorman MF; Litvak LM; Cook SJ; Loiselle LM; DeJong MD; Hedley-Williams A; Sunderhaus LS; Hayes CA; Gifford RH
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 24658601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonlinguistic Outcome Measures in Adult Cochlear Implant Users Over the First Year of Implantation.
    Drennan WR; Won JH; Timme AO; Rubinstein JT
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 26656317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing.
    Tejani VD; Brown CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3667. PubMed ID: 32486815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs.
    Gifford RH; Shallop JK; Peterson AM
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 18212519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association of Self-Reported Coping Strategies With Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Espahbodi M; Harvey E; Livingston AJ; Montagne W; Kozlowski K; Jensen J; Liu X; Juan W; Tarima S; Rusch M; Harris MS
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Sep; 43(8):e888-e894. PubMed ID: 35970167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users?
    Capretta NR; Moberly AC
    Laryngoscope; 2016 Mar; 126(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 26256441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.