122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33721088)
1. Successful transition from open to minimally invasive approach in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a single-center experience in Japan.
Kanamori J; Watanabe M; Kozuki R; Toihata T; Otake R; Takahashi K; Okamura A; Imamura Y; Mine S
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2021 Aug; 406(5):1407-1414. PubMed ID: 33721088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fully robotic side-to-side stapled anastomosis provides less anastomotic leakage than conventional minimally invasive approach in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Kanamori J; Watanabe M; Maruyama S; Kanie Y; Kuriyama K; Terayama M; Takahashi N; Tamura M; Okamura A; Imamura Y
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2024 Jul; 17(3):e13340. PubMed ID: 38925165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagostomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Compared with open approach.
Zhang Z; Xu M; Guo M; Liu X
Int J Surg; 2017 Sep; 45():98-104. PubMed ID: 28778695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy via two ports provides equivalent perioperative outcomes to open.
Zhao Y; Jiao W; Zhao J; Wang X; Luo Y; Wang Y
Indian J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51 Suppl 2():e25-8. PubMed ID: 25712837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.
Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Rosman C; Roig J; Scheepers JJ; Cuesta MA; Luyer MD; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Workum F; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 27129563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Analysis of Outcomes After Transition From Open to Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
Merritt RE; Kneuertz PJ; D'Souza DM; Abdel-Rasoul M; Perry KA
Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Apr; 111(4):1174-1181. PubMed ID: 32888925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Use of gastric tube in construction technique thoracoscopic and laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy].
Rong B; Guo M; Wu X
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 20(8):876-879. PubMed ID: 28836245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive and robotic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Huang L; Onaitis M
J Thorac Dis; 2014 May; 6 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S314-21. PubMed ID: 24876936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Bizekis C; Kent MS; Luketich JD; Buenaventura PO; Landreneau RJ; Schuchert MJ; Alvelo-Rivera M
Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Aug; 82(2):402-6; discussion 406-7. PubMed ID: 16863737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative analysis of long-term oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a propensity score matched observational study.
Merritt RE; Kneuertz PJ; Abdel-Rasoul M; D'Souza DM; Perry KA
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2021 Dec; 16(1):347. PubMed ID: 34872562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally Invasive Versus open AbdominoThoracic Esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma (MIVATE) - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial DRKS00016773.
Nickel F; Probst P; Studier-Fischer A; Nienhüser H; Pauly J; Kowalewski KF; Weiterer S; Knebel P; Diener MK; Weigand MA; Büchler MW; Schmidt T; Müller-Stich BP
Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 33430937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: initial experience from China.
Li H; Hu B; You B; Miao JB; Fu YL; Chen QR
Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Apr; 125(8):1376-80. PubMed ID: 22613638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following hybrid minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Yun JS; Na KJ; Song SY; Kim S; Jeong IS; Oh SG
J Thorac Dis; 2017 Sep; 9(9):3097-3104. PubMed ID: 29221284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Totally mechanical linear stapled anastomosis for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Operative technique and short-term outcomes.
Gao HJ; Mu JW; Pan WM; Brock M; Wang ML; Han B; Ma K
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Mar; 11(3):769-776. PubMed ID: 32012474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-term outcome of totally minimally invasive versus hybrid minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
Yu WQ; Zhai LX; Shi GD; Tang JY; Gao HJ; Wei YC
Asian J Surg; 2023 Sep; 46(9):3727-3733. PubMed ID: 37085421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A preliminary experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Tapias LF; Morse CR
Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 21967644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preventing anastomotic complications: early results of laparoscopic gastric devascularization two weeks prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Strosberg DS; Merritt RE; Perry KA
Surg Endosc; 2017 Mar; 31(3):1371-1375. PubMed ID: 27495339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally Invasive
Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
