These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Efficient sampling for polynomial chaos-based uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis using weighted approximate Fekete points. Burk KM; Narayan A; Orr JA Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Nov; 36(11):e3395. PubMed ID: 32794272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of an Adaptive Polynomial Chaos Expansion on Computationally Expensive Three-Dimensional Cardiovascular Models for Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis. Quicken S; Donders WP; van Disseldorp EM; Gashi K; Mees BM; van de Vosse FN; Lopata RG; Delhaas T; Huberts W J Biomech Eng; 2016 Dec; 138(12):. PubMed ID: 27636531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A stochastic collocation method for uncertainty quantification and propagation in cardiovascular simulations. Sankaran S; Marsden AL J Biomech Eng; 2011 Mar; 133(3):031001. PubMed ID: 21303177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Practical identifiability and uncertainty quantification of a pulsatile cardiovascular model. Marquis AD; Arnold A; Dean-Bernhoft C; Carlson BE; Olufsen MS Math Biosci; 2018 Oct; 304():9-24. PubMed ID: 30017910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uncertainty in cardiac myofiber orientation and stiffnesses dominate the variability of left ventricle deformation response. Rodríguez-Cantano R; Sundnes J; Rognes ME Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2019 May; 35(5):e3178. PubMed ID: 30632711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comprehensive Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis for Cardiac Action Potential Models. Pathmanathan P; Cordeiro JM; Gray RA Front Physiol; 2019; 10():721. PubMed ID: 31297060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reducing Geometric Uncertainty in Computational Hemodynamics by Deep Learning-Assisted Parallel-Chain MCMC. Du P; Wang JX J Biomech Eng; 2022 Dec; 144(12):. PubMed ID: 36166284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uncertainty quantification in coronary blood flow simulations: Impact of geometry, boundary conditions and blood viscosity. Sankaran S; Kim HJ; Choi G; Taylor CA J Biomech; 2016 Aug; 49(12):2540-7. PubMed ID: 26803339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A guide to uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis for cardiovascular applications. Eck VG; Donders WP; Sturdy J; Feinberg J; Delhaas T; Hellevik LR; Huberts W Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2016 Aug; 32(8):. PubMed ID: 26475178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unsupervised stochastic learning and reduced order modeling for global sensitivity analysis in cardiac electrophysiology models. El Moçayd N; Belhamadia Y; Seaid M Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Jul; 255():108311. PubMed ID: 39032242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Metamodeling Approach for Instant Severity Assessment and Uncertainty Quantification of Iliac Artery Stenoses. Heinen SGH; Gashi K; van den Heuvel DAF; de Vries JPPM; van de Vosse FN; Delhaas T; Huberts W J Biomech Eng; 2020 Jan; 142(1):. PubMed ID: 31513713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uncertainty quantification of the effect of cardiac position variability in the inverse problem of electrocardiographic imaging. Bergquist JA; Zenger B; Rupp LC; Busatto A; Tate J; Brooks DH; Narayan A; MacLeod RS Physiol Meas; 2023 Oct; 44(10):. PubMed ID: 37734339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of Uncertainty and Variability in Finite Element Computational Models for Biomedical Engineering: Characterization and Propagation. Mangado N; Piella G; Noailly J; Pons-Prats J; Ballester MÁ Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2016; 4():85. PubMed ID: 27872840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Data-Driven Uncertainty Quantification for Cardiac Electrophysiological Models: Impact of Physiological Variability on Action Potential and Spiral Wave Dynamics. Pathmanathan P; Galappaththige SK; Cordeiro JM; Kaboudian A; Fenton FH; Gray RA Front Physiol; 2020; 11():585400. PubMed ID: 33329034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uncertainty Quantification of a Multiscale Model for In-Stent Restenosis. Nikishova A; Veen L; Zun P; Hoekstra AG Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):761-774. PubMed ID: 30136082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of Biotransport in a Tumor With Uncertain Material Properties Using a Nonintrusive Spectral Uncertainty Quantification Method. Alexanderian A; Zhu L; Salloum M; Ma R; Yu M J Biomech Eng; 2017 Sep; 139(9):. PubMed ID: 28633165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of an Experimental and Digital Cardiovascular Arterial Model for Transient Hemodynamic and Postural Change Studies: "A Preliminary Framework Analysis". Hewlin RL; Kizito JP Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Mar; 9(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 29124548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]