These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3372166)

  • 1. Effect of number of elements and size of stimulus field on recordability of pattern reversal visual evoked response.
    Katsumi O; Hirose T; Tsukada T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1988 Jun; 29(6):922-7. PubMed ID: 3372166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simultaneous pattern reversal ERG and VER recordings. Effect of stimulus field and central scotoma.
    Sakaue H; Katsumi O; Mehta M; Hirose T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Mar; 31(3):506-11. PubMed ID: 2318589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual acuity prediction using the visual evoked response.
    Douthwaite WA; Jenkins TC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(4):421-4. PubMed ID: 3454920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Objective evaluation of binocular function with pattern reversal VER. III. Effect of stimulus size and localization.
    Katsumi O; Tanino T; Hirose T
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1986 Dec; 64(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 3811882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pattern reversal VER as a tool for evaluating unbalanced visual inputs between the two eyes.
    Katsumi O; Hirose T; Tanino T; Uemura Y
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1988; 32(1):86-97. PubMed ID: 3411817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of stimulation frequency and retinal stimulus location on visual evoked potential topography.
    Skrandies W
    Brain Topogr; 2007; 20(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 17587164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of stimulus contrast on simultaneous steady-state pattern reversal electroretinogram and visual evoked response.
    Tetsuka S; Katsumi O; Mehta M; Tetsuka H; Hirose T
    Ophthalmic Res; 1992; 24(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 1608596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of stimulus field size and localization on the binocular pattern reversal visual evoked response.
    Katsumi O; Hirose T; Tanino T
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1988 Jul; 69(3):293-305. PubMed ID: 3168729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of stimulus contrast on binocular VER.
    Katsumi O; Oguchi Y; Kawara T; Peli E
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1984; 28(4):401-8. PubMed ID: 6530840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulated nystagmus reduces pattern-reversal more strongly than pattern-onset multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    Hoffmann MB; Seufert PS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 116(7):1723-32. PubMed ID: 15908272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The visual evoked potential in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: effects of check size, field size, and stimulation rate.
    Towle VL; Moskowitz A; Sokol S; Schwartz B
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1983 Feb; 24(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 6826322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multifocal visual evoked potential responses to pattern-reversal, pattern-onset, pattern-offset, and sparse pulse stimuli.
    Fortune B; Demirel S; Bui BV
    Vis Neurosci; 2009; 26(2):227-35. PubMed ID: 19250600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Visual evoked potentials: methodologic problems--variations of stimulus parameters].
    Diener HC; Zimmermann C
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1985 Sep; 16(3):155-7. PubMed ID: 3933955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amplitude modulation of gamma band oscillations at alpha frequency produced by photic driving.
    Chorlian DB; Porjesz B; Begleiter H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):262-78. PubMed ID: 16377013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Texture segmentation and visual search for pop-out targets. An ERP study.
    Schubö A; Schröger E; Meinecke C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Nov; 21(3):317-34. PubMed ID: 15511648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interocular luminance differences and the binocular pattern-reversal visual-evoked response.
    Trick GL; Dawson WW; Compton JR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1982 Mar; 22(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 7061211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemispheric asymmetry in transient visual evoked potentials induced by the spatial factor of the stimulation.
    Rebai M; Bagot JD; Viggiano MP
    Brain Cogn; 1993 Nov; 23(2):263-78. PubMed ID: 8292329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Steady-state visual evoked cortical potentials from stimulation of visual field quadrants. Optimizing pattern variables for the size of the field to be investigated.
    Bradnam M; Keating D; Montgomery D; Evans A; Damato B; Cluckie A
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1992; 79(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 1591969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of light scatter, defocusing, mean luminosity, contrast, and central scotoma on the PVER amplitude-check size function curve.
    Katsumi O; Tetsuka H; Tetsuka S; Hoon-Ohn Y; Hirose T
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1993 Oct; 71(5):606-15. PubMed ID: 8109206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of temporal sparseness and dichoptic presentation on multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    James AC; Ruseckaite R; Maddess T
    Vis Neurosci; 2005; 22(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 15842740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.