These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33721744)

  • 1. Clinical practice guidelines in courts' representation of medical evidence and testimony.
    Taipale J; Hautamäki L
    Soc Sci Med; 2021 Apr; 275():113805. PubMed ID: 33721744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Judges' socio-technical review of contested expertise.
    Taipale J
    Soc Stud Sci; 2019 Jun; 49(3):310-332. PubMed ID: 31185873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inconsistency in evidentiary standards for medical testimony: disorder in the courts.
    Kassirer JP; Cecil JS
    JAMA; 2002 Sep; 288(11):1382-7. PubMed ID: 12234232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predefined criteria and interpretative flexibility in legal courts' evaluation of expertise.
    Taipale J
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Nov; 28(8):883-896. PubMed ID: 31694499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Faults and failure of tonsil surgery and other standard procedures in otorhinolaryngology].
    Windfuhr JP
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2013 Apr; 92 Suppl 1():S33-72. PubMed ID: 23625716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ["An Italian Court recognizes the occupational origin of a trigeminal neuroma in a mobile telephone user: a case-study of the complex relationships between science and laws"].
    Lagorio S; Vecchia P
    Med Lav; 2011; 102(2):144-62. PubMed ID: 21485052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Epidemiology in the courtroom: an evidence-based paradigm for the determination of causation in compensation environments.
    Sinclair DC
    J Occup Environ Med; 2010 Apr; 52(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 20357683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mild traumatic brain injury: Is DTI ready for the courtroom?
    Shenton ME; Price BH; Levin L; Edersheim JG
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 61():50-63. PubMed ID: 30391039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Asking the gatekeepers: a national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world.
    Gatowski SI; Dobbin SA; Richardson JT; Ginsburg GP; Merlino ML; Dahir V
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):433-58. PubMed ID: 11688367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognition by French courts of compensation for post-vaccination multiple sclerosis: the consequences with regard to expert practice.
    Rougé-Maillart CI; Guillaume N; Jousset N; Penneau M
    Med Sci Law; 2007 Jul; 47(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 17725231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Admissibility of scientific evidence post-Daubert.
    Masten J; Strzelczyk JJ
    Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 11725886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proving whiplash injury cases in court.
    Jakubiec P
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2019; 69(4):208-221. PubMed ID: 32564577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neuropsychologists diagnose traumatic brain injury.
    Wade JB; DeMatteo D; Hart RP
    Brain Inj; 2004 Jul; 18(7):629-43. PubMed ID: 15204325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence-based medicine and the law: the courts confront clinical practice guidelines.
    Rosoff AJ
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2001 Apr; 26(2):327-68. PubMed ID: 11330083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk assessment in the law: legal admissibility, scientific validity, and some disparities between research and practice.
    Krauss DA; Scurich N
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 23613165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) and expert testimony.
    Kulich R; Maciewicz R; Scrivani SJ
    Pain Med; 2009 Mar; 10(2):373-80. PubMed ID: 19254335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Life care planning after traumatic brain injury.
    Zasler ND; Ameis A; Riddick-Grisham SN
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2013 Aug; 24(3):445-65. PubMed ID: 23910485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].
    Gkotsi GM; Moulin V; Gasser J
    Encephale; 2015 Oct; 41(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 25439859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.