These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3372189)

  • 1. Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images.
    Getty DJ; Pickett RM; D'Orsi CJ; Swets JA
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Apr; 23(4):240-52. PubMed ID: 3372189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative comparison of clustered microcalcifications in for-presentation and for-processing mammograms in full-field digital mammography.
    Wang J; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
    Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3726-3738. PubMed ID: 28477395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
    Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining evidence from multiple imaging modalities: a feature-analysis method.
    Seltzer SE; McNeil BJ; D'Orsi CJ; Getty DJ; Pickett RM; Swets JA
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1992; 16(6):373-80. PubMed ID: 1468071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Wu Y; Giger ML; Doi K; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA; Metz CE
    Radiology; 1993 Apr; 187(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 8451441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A quadratic model for combining quantitative diagnostic assessments from radiologist and computer in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Jiang Y; Metz CE
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Feb; 13(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 16428048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improvement in radiologists' characterization of malignant and benign breast masses on serial mammograms with computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study.
    Hadjiiski L; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Blane C; Paramagul C; Petrick N; Bailey J; Klein K; Foster M; Patterson S; Adler D; Nees A; Shen J
    Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):255-65. PubMed ID: 15317954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancing and evaluating diagnostic accuracy.
    Swets JA; Getty DJ; Pickett RM; D'Orsi CJ; Seltzer SE; McNeil BJ
    Med Decis Making; 1991; 11(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 2034078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image processing and computer-aided diagnosis.
    Giger M; MacMahon H
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1996 May; 34(3):565-96. PubMed ID: 8657872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer vision and artificial intelligence in mammography.
    Vyborny CJ; Giger ML
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):699-708. PubMed ID: 8109525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
    Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting diagnostic error in radiology via eye-tracking and image analytics: preliminary investigation in mammography.
    Voisin S; Pinto F; Morin-Ducote G; Hudson KB; Tourassi GD
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101906. PubMed ID: 24089908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study of conventional mammography film interpretations with soft copy readings of the same examinations.
    Gitlin JN; Narayan AK; Mitchell CA; Akmal AM; Eisner DJ; Peterson LM; Nie D; McClintock TR
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Mar; 20(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 17191103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of artificial neural networks in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Liu B
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1260():195-204. PubMed ID: 25502383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study on two different CAD systems for mammography as an aid to radiological diagnosis in the search of microcalcification clusters.
    Lauria A; Palmiero R; Forni G; Fantacci ME; Imbriaco M; Sodano A; Indovina PL
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 55(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 16036158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Voice-activated retrieval of mammography reference images.
    Swett HA; Mutalik PG; Neklesa VP; Horvath L; Lee C; Richter J; Tocino I; Fisher PR
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 May; 11(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 9608929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CADMIUM II: acquisition and representation of radiological knowledge for computerized decision support in mammography.
    Alberdi E; Taylor P; Lee R; Fox J; Sordo M; Todd-Pokropek A
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2000; ():7-11. PubMed ID: 11079834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiographers supporting radiologists in the interpretation of screening mammography: a viable strategy to meet the shortage in the number of radiologists.
    Torres-Mejía G; Smith RA; Carranza-Flores Mde L; Bogart A; Martínez-Matsushita L; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Ortega-Olvera C; Montemayor-Varela E; Angeles-Llerenas A; Bautista-Arredondo S; Sánchez-González G; Martínez-Montañez OG; Uscanga-Sánchez SR; Lazcano-Ponce E; Hernández-Ávila M
    BMC Cancer; 2015 May; 15():410. PubMed ID: 25975383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of expert systems to mammographic image analysis.
    Cook HM; Fox MD
    Am J Physiol Imaging; 1989; 4(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 2923720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.