302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33722636)
1. Comparison of 10-2 and 24-2C Test Grids for Identifying Central Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma and Suspect Patients.
Phu J; Kalloniatis M
Ophthalmology; 2021 Oct; 128(10):1405-1416. PubMed ID: 33722636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ability of 24-2C and 24-2 Grids to Identify Central Visual Field Defects and Structure-Function Concordance in Glaucoma and Suspects.
Phu J; Kalloniatis M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 219():317-331. PubMed ID: 32621896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing Static Perimetry Protocols of Central Field Testing among Patients with Glaucoma.
Behera G; Nath A; Ramasamy A; Kaliaperumal S
Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Jun; 100(6):406-411. PubMed ID: 37129640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of 24-2 Faster, Fast, and Standard Programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for Perimetry in Patients With Manifest and Suspect Glaucoma.
Thulasidas M; Patyal S
J Glaucoma; 2020 Nov; 29(11):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 32890104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do Additional Testing Locations Improve the Detection of Macular Perimetric Defects in Glaucoma?
Montesano G; McKendrick AM; Turpin A; Brusini P; Oddone F; Fogagnolo P; Perdicchi A; Johnson CA; Lanzetta P; Rossetti LM; Garway-Heath DF; Crabb DP
Ophthalmology; 2021 Dec; 128(12):1722-1735. PubMed ID: 34153384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification and Predictors of Visual Field Variability in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucomatous Eyes Using SITA-Faster.
Tan JCK; Agar A; Kalloniatis M; Phu J
Ophthalmology; 2024 Jun; 131(6):658-666. PubMed ID: 38110124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the 24-2 and 24-2C Visual Field Grids in Determining the Macular Structure-Function Relationship in Glaucoma.
Hong JW; Baek MS; Lee JY; Song MK; Shin JW; Kook MS
J Glaucoma; 2021 Oct; 30(10):887-894. PubMed ID: 34387259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhancing Structure-Function Correlations in Glaucoma with Customized Spatial Mapping.
Ballae Ganeshrao S; Turpin A; Denniss J; McKendrick AM
Ophthalmology; 2015 Aug; 122(8):1695-705. PubMed ID: 26077579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Clues to Predict the Presence of Parafoveal Scotoma on Humphrey 10-2 Visual Field Using a Humphrey 24-2 Visual Field.
Park HY; Hwang BE; Shin HY; Park CK
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jan; 161():150-9. PubMed ID: 26476213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporal Wedge Defects in Glaucoma: Structure/Function Correlation With Threshold Automated Perimetry of the Full Visual Field.
Wall M; Lee EJ; Wanzek RJ; Chong LX; Turpin A
J Glaucoma; 2020 Mar; 29(3):191-197. PubMed ID: 32108691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of hemifield sector analysis protocol in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry for the diagnosis and early detection of glaucomatous field defects.
Mousa MF; Cubbidge RP; Al-Mansouri F; Bener A
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 24511212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A New SITA Perimetric Threshold Testing Algorithm: Construction and a Multicenter Clinical Study.
Heijl A; Patella VM; Chong LX; Iwase A; Leung CK; Tuulonen A; Lee GC; Callan T; Bengtsson B
Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 198():154-165. PubMed ID: 30336129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.
Patel A; Wollstein G; Ishikawa H; Schuman JS
Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar; 114(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 17123623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.
Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of Transitioning from SITA Standard to SITA Faster on Visual Field Performance.
Pham AT; Ramulu PY; Boland MV; Yohannan J
Ophthalmology; 2021 Oct; 128(10):1417-1425. PubMed ID: 33798655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of Functional Change in Preperimetric and Perimetric Glaucoma Using 10-2 Matrix Perimetry.
Jung KI; Park CK
Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 182():35-44. PubMed ID: 28734817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Consistency of Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects Using a Clustered SITA-Faster Protocol.
Tan JCK; Phu J; Go D; Nguyen D; Masselos K; Bank A; Kalloniatis M; Agar A
Ophthalmology; 2023 Nov; 130(11):1138-1148. PubMed ID: 37385298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Quality and Output of Different Optimal Perimetric Testing Approaches in Children With Glaucoma.
Patel DE; Cumberland PM; Walters BC; Russell-Eggitt I; Brookes J; Papadopoulos M; Khaw PT; Viswanathan AC; Garway-Heath D; Cortina-Borja M; Rahi JS;
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 136(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 29285534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of a test grid using Eye Movement Perimetry for screening glaucomatous visual field defects.
Kadavath Meethal NS; Mazumdar D; Asokan R; Panday M; van der Steen J; Vermeer KA; Lemij HG; George RJ; Pel JJM
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 256(2):371-379. PubMed ID: 29282563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship Between Central Retinal Vessel Trunk Location and Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma.
Wang M; Wang H; Pasquale LR; Baniasadi N; Shen LQ; Bex PJ; Elze T
Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 176():53-60. PubMed ID: 28088508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
