303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33722636)
21. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Glaucoma detection with matrix and standard achromatic perimetry.
Burgansky-Eliash Z; Wollstein G; Patel A; Bilonick RA; Ishikawa H; Kagemann L; Dilworth WD; Schuman JS
Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jul; 91(7):933-8. PubMed ID: 17215267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice?
Szatmáry G; Biousse V; Newman NJ
Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1162-73. PubMed ID: 12215089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A Strategy for Seeding Point Error Assessment for Retesting (SPEAR) in Perimetry Applied to Normal Subjects, Glaucoma Suspects, and Patients With Glaucoma.
Phu J; Kalloniatis M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 221():115-130. PubMed ID: 32777379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of 30-2 Standard and Fast programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for perimetry in patients with intracranial tumors.
Singh MD; Jain K
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 65(11):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 29133651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of the Humphrey swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies.
Sharma AK; Goldberg I; Graham SL; Mohsin M
J Glaucoma; 2000 Feb; 9(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10708227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance of iPad-based threshold perimetry in glaucoma and controls.
Schulz AM; Graham EC; You Y; Klistorner A; Graham SL
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 46(4):346-355. PubMed ID: 28976067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Agreement Between 10-2 and 24-2C Visual Field Test Protocols for Detecting Glaucomatous Central Visual Field Defects.
Chakravarti T; Moghadam M; Proudfoot JA; Weinreb RN; Bowd C; Zangwill LM
J Glaucoma; 2021 Jun; 30(6):e285-e291. PubMed ID: 33813563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development of Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects in Preperimetric Glaucoma Patients Within 3 Years of Diagnosis.
Inuzuka H; Kawase K; Sawada A; Kokuzawa S; Ishida K; Yamamoto T
J Glaucoma; 2016 Jun; 25(6):e591-5. PubMed ID: 25943739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of defect depths for sinusoidal and circular perimetric stimuli in patients with glaucoma.
Swanson WH; King BJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2019 Jan; 39(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 30628740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Comparison of the Visual Field Parameters of SITA Faster and SITA Standard Strategies in Glaucoma.
Lavanya R; Riyazuddin M; Dasari S; Puttaiah NK; Venugopal JP; Pradhan ZS; Devi S; Sreenivasaiah S; Ganeshrao SB; Rao HL
J Glaucoma; 2020 Sep; 29(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 32459685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Visualizing the Consistency of Clinical Characteristics that Distinguish Healthy Persons, Glaucoma Suspect Patients, and Manifest Glaucoma Patients.
Phu J; Khuu SK; Agar A; Domadious I; Ng A; Kalloniatis M
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2020; 3(4):274-287. PubMed ID: 33012332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of the Macular Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer and the Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer in Early to Severe Stages of Glaucoma: Correlation with Central Visual Function and Visual Field Indexes.
Bambo MP; Güerri N; Ferrandez B; Cameo B; Fuertes I; Polo V; Garcia-Martin E
Ophthalmic Res; 2017; 57(4):216-223. PubMed ID: 28068662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The repeatability of mean defect with size III and size V standard automated perimetry.
Wall M; Doyle CK; Zamba KD; Artes P; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 54(2):1345-51. PubMed ID: 23341012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Threshold Static Automated Perimetry of the Full Visual Field in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
Wall M; Subramani A; Chong LX; Galindo R; Turpin A; Kardon RH; Thurtell MJ; Bailey JA; Marin-Franch I
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2019 May; 60(6):1898-1905. PubMed ID: 31042797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Structure-function relationships between spectral-domain OCT and standard achromatic perimetry.
Nilforushan N; Nassiri N; Moghimi S; Law SK; Giaconi J; Coleman AL; Caprioli J; Nouri-Mahdavi K
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 May; 53(6):2740-8. PubMed ID: 22447869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Relationship between the Vertical Asymmetry of the Posterior Pole of the Eye and the Visual Field Damage in Glaucomatous Eyes.
Hirasawa K; Yamashita T; Fujino Y; Matsuura M; Yanagisawa M; Kii Y; Sakamoto T; Murata H; Asaoka R
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2019; 2(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 32672554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
