162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33722740)
1. Variability and reliability of the French version of the Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire (QoR-40).
Vignaud M; Morel C; Henault A; Futier E; Pereira B; Lambert C; Beloeil H
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med; 2021 Apr; 40(2):100822. PubMed ID: 33722740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire.
Lee JH; Kim D; Seo D; Son JS; Kim DC
Korean J Anesthesiol; 2018 Dec; 71(6):467-475. PubMed ID: 29684992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population.
Demumieux F; Ludes PO; Diemunsch P; Bennett-Guerrero E; Lujic M; Lefebvre F; Noll E
Br J Anaesth; 2020 Jun; 124(6):761-767. PubMed ID: 32303379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15.
Kleif J; Edwards HM; Sort R; Vilandt J; Gögenur I
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2015 Aug; 59(7):912-20. PubMed ID: 25867135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study.
Pitimana-Aree S; Udompanthurak S; Lapmahapaisan S; Tareerath M; Wangdee A
BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):64. PubMed ID: 27538900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Linguistic validation of a widely used recovery score: quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15).
Kara U; Şimşek F; Kamburoğlu H; Özhan MÖ; Alakuş Ü; İnce ME; Eksert S; Özkan G; Eşkin MB; Şenkal S
Turk J Med Sci; 2022 Apr; 52(2):427-435. PubMed ID: 36161615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire.
Lee JH; Ki M; Choi S; Woo CJ; Kim D; Lim H; Kim DC
Korean J Anesthesiol; 2021 Apr; 74(2):142-149. PubMed ID: 33121227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation and clinical utility of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 with enhanced recovery after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.
Yoon S; Joo H; Oh YM; Lee J; Bahk JH; Lee HJ
Br J Anaesth; 2020 Oct; 125(4):614-621. PubMed ID: 32703550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40.
Tanaka Y; Wakita T; Fukuhara S; Nishiwada M; Inoue S; Kawaguchi M; Furuya H
J Anesth; 2011 Aug; 25(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 21626452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CROATIAN VERSION OF THE QUALITY OF RECOVERY QUESTIONNAIRE (QoR-40): TRANSCULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION.
Miklić Bublić M; Miklić P; Barl P; Matas M; Sekulić A
Acta Clin Croat; 2021 Jun; 60(2):237-245. PubMed ID: 34744273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Translation and validation of the Japanese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Questionnaire.
Nakatani S; Ida M; Tanaka Y; Okamoto N; Wang X; Nakatani H; Sato M; Naito Y; Kawaguchi M
J Anesth; 2021 Jun; 35(3):426-433. PubMed ID: 33763758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Translation and Validation of the Korean Version of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Score QoR-15.
Kim D; Kim JK; Yeo J
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():3456234. PubMed ID: 33123568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hindi translation and cultural adaptation of the quality of recovery score-40 (QoR-40 score): A validation study.
Govil N; Rathore R; Tiwari A; Garg PK; Parag K; Mishra P
Indian J Anaesth; 2024 Jun; 68(6):533-539. PubMed ID: 38903262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the Dutch translation of the quality of recovery-15 scale.
de Vlieger JCN; Luiting WH; Lockyer J; Meyer P; Fleer J; Sanderman R; Wietasch JKG
BMC Anesthesiol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):243. PubMed ID: 35915438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Translation and validation of the Norwegian version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15.
Bergestuen L; Moger T; Oterhals K; Pfeffer F; Nestvold T; Norderval S; Nymo LS; Havnes K; Lassen K; Breivik K
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2024 Jan; 68(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 37682626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40.
Myles PS; Weitkamp B; Jones K; Melick J; Hensen S
Br J Anaesth; 2000 Jan; 84(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 10740540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Score and Its Comparison with the Post-Operative Quality Recovery Scale.
Bu XS; Zhang J; Zuo YX
Patient; 2016 Jun; 9(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 26518201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity and reliability of the Iranian version of the quality of recovery-40 questionnaire.
Yaghoobi S; Hamidfar M; Lawson DM; Fridlund B; Myles PS; Pakpour AH
Anesth Pain Med; 2015 Apr; 5(2):e20350. PubMed ID: 25893185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychometric testing of the Chinese quality of recovery score.
Chan MT; Lo CC; Lok CK; Chan TW; Choi KC; Gin T
Anesth Analg; 2008 Oct; 107(4):1189-95. PubMed ID: 18806027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the postoperative quality of recovery 15 (QoR-15) questionnaire for Spanish-speaking patients: A prospective cohort study.
Morales-Ariza V; Loaiza-Aldeán Y; de Miguel M; Peña-Navarro M; Martínez-Silva O; González-Tallada A; Manrique-Muñoz S; de Nadal M
Am J Surg; 2023 Apr; 225(4):740-747. PubMed ID: 36414472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
