These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33722927)

  • 1. Accuracy Assessment of SUV Measurements in SPECT/CT: A Phantom Study.
    Halim F; Yahya H; Jaafar KN; Mansor S
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2021 Sep; 49(3):250-255. PubMed ID: 33722927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental validation of absolute SPECT/CT quantification for response monitoring in breast cancer.
    Collarino A; Pereira Arias-Bouda LM; Valdés Olmos RA; van der Tol P; Dibbets-Schneider P; de Geus-Oei LF; van Velden FHP
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2143-2153. PubMed ID: 29572848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Improvement of Standardized Uptake Value Accuracy in the
    Nakamura Y; Kangai Y; Abe T; Nakahara Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(9):921-931. PubMed ID: 34544916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimization of Number of Iterations as a Reconstruction Parameter in Bone SPECT Imaging Using a Novel Thoracic Spine Phantom.
    Fukami M; Matsutomo N; Yamamoto T
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2021 Jun; 49(2):143-149. PubMed ID: 33361180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification evaluation of
    Huang K; Feng Y; Liu D; Liang W; Li L
    Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 34(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 31768820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantify total activity by volume-of-interest expansion with clinical SPECT/CT systems, a phantom study.
    Bian J; James JR; Wagner R; Halama J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jan; 24(1):e13828. PubMed ID: 36347052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of reconstruction parameters on quantitative bone SPECT imaging: A novel thoracic spine phantom study.
    Hishikawa M; Matsutomo N; Yamamoto T
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22 Suppl 2():140. PubMed ID: 31802053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of a digital phantom developed by QIBA for harmonizing SUVs obtained from the state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems: a multicenter study.
    Nakahara T; Daisaki H; Yamamoto Y; Iimori T; Miyagawa K; Okamoto T; Owaki Y; Yada N; Sawada K; Tokorodani R; Jinzaki M
    EJNMMI Res; 2017 Dec; 7(1):53. PubMed ID: 28639254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A retrospective study of SPECT/CT scans using SUV measurement of the normal pelvis with Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate.
    Wang R; Duan X; Shen C; Han D; Ma J; Wu H; Xu X; Qin T; Fan Q; Zhang Z; Shi W; Guo Y
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(6):895-908. PubMed ID: 30103368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Determination of Bone SPECT Image Reconstruction Conditions in the Head and Neck Region].
    Hayashi N; Tokorodani R; Kenda S; Ogasawara D; Yabe F; Ito K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(7):700-709. PubMed ID: 34305056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fluctuation of quantitative values on acquisition time and the reconstruction conditions in 99mTc-SPECT.
    Tsujimoto M; Shirakawa S; Teramoto A; Ishiguro M; Nakane K; Ida Y; Toyama H
    Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jul; 39(7):601-609. PubMed ID: 29893748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image quantification for radiation dose calculations--limitations and uncertainties.
    Pereira JM; Stabin MG; Lima FR; Guimarães MI; Forrester JW
    Health Phys; 2010 Nov; 99(5):688-701. PubMed ID: 20938240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative accuracy of clinical 99mTc SPECT/CT using ordered-subset expectation maximization with 3-dimensional resolution recovery, attenuation, and scatter correction.
    Zeintl J; Vija AH; Yahil A; Hornegger J; Kuwert T
    J Nucl Med; 2010 Jun; 51(6):921-8. PubMed ID: 20484423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeatability of SUV measurements in serial PET.
    Schwartz J; Humm JL; Gonen M; Kalaigian H; Schoder H; Larson SM; Nehmeh SA
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2629-38. PubMed ID: 21776800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phantom and clinical evaluation of bone SPECT/CT image reconstruction with xSPECT algorithm.
    Miyaji N; Miwa K; Tokiwa A; Ichikawa H; Terauchi T; Koizumi M; Onoguchi M
    EJNMMI Res; 2020 Jun; 10(1):71. PubMed ID: 32601770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of Noise and Resolution for Quantitative
    Tran-Gia J; Lassmann M
    J Nucl Med; 2019 Jan; 60(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 29976698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Texture analysis for automated evaluation of Jaszczak phantom SPECT system tests.
    Nichols KJ; DiFilippo FP; Palestro CJ
    Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):262-272. PubMed ID: 30418674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correction of photon attenuation and collimator response for a body-contouring SPECT/CT imaging system.
    Seo Y; Wong KH; Sun M; Franc BL; Hawkins RA; Hasegawa BH
    J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):868-77. PubMed ID: 15872362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing Image Quantification for
    Tran-Gia J; Lassmann M
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Apr; 59(4):616-624. PubMed ID: 29097409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitatively accurate activity measurements with a dedicated cardiac SPECT camera: Physical phantom experiments.
    Pourmoghaddas A; Wells RG
    Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):44. PubMed ID: 26745898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.