These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33723504)
1. Environmental implication of personal protection equipment in the pandemic era: LCA comparison of face masks typologies. Rodríguez NB; Formentini G; Favi C; Marconi M Procedia CIRP; 2021; 98():306-311. PubMed ID: 33723504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reuse of end-of-life personal protective equipment in hot asphalt mixtures: an environmental evaluation. Landi D; Marconi M; Bocci E; Gianvincenzi M; Spreafico C Procedia CIRP; 2023; 116():420-425. PubMed ID: 37091128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reconciling human health with the environment while struggling against the COVID-19 pandemic through improved face mask eco-design. Morone P; Yilan G; Imbert E; Becchetti L Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2445. PubMed ID: 35165351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Life cycle assessment and circularity evaluation of the non-medical masks in the Covid-19 pandemic: a Brazilian case. Maceno MMC; João S; Voltolini DR; Zattar IC Environ Dev Sustain; 2022 May; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 35571996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Life cycle assessment of single-use surgical and embedded filtration layer (EFL) reusable face mask. Lee AWL; Neo ERK; Khoo ZY; Yeo Z; Tan YS; Chng S; Yan W; Lok BK; Low JSC Resour Conserv Recycl; 2021 Jul; 170():105580. PubMed ID: 33814723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Face masks: a COVID-19 protector or environmental contaminant? Dey S; Samanta P; Dutta D; Kundu D; Ghosh AR; Kumar S Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Sep; 30(41):93363-93387. PubMed ID: 37548785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Environmental challenges induced by extensive use of face masks during COVID-19: A review and potential solutions. Selvaranjan K; Navaratnam S; Rajeev P; Ravintherakumaran N Environ Chall (Amst); 2021 Apr; 3():100039. PubMed ID: 38620606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Carbon footprint assessment of face masks in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: Based on different protective performance and applicable scenarios. Luo Y; Yu M; Wu X; Ding X; Wang L J Clean Prod; 2023 Feb; 387():135854. PubMed ID: 36619699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Custom-made 3D-printed face masks in case of pandemic crisis situations with a lack of commercially available FFP2/3 masks. Swennen GRJ; Pottel L; Haers PE Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 May; 49(5):673-677. PubMed ID: 32265088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Face masks. Technical, technological and functional characteristics and hygienic-sanitary aspects related to the use of filtering mask in the community. Santarsiero A; Ciambelli P; Donsì G; Quadrini F; Briancesco R; D'Alessandro D; Fara GM Ann Ig; 2020; 32(5):472-520. PubMed ID: 32744582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact and effectiveness of the general public wearing masks to reduce the spread of pandemics in the UK: a multidisciplinary comparison of single-use masks versus reusable face masks. Allison AL; Ambrose-Dempster E; Bawn M; Arredondo MC; Chau C; Chandler K; Dobrijevic D; Aparasi TD; Hailes HC; Lettieri P; Liu C; Medda F; Michie S; Miodownik M; Munro B; Purkiss D; Ward JM UCL Open Environ; 2021; 3():e022. PubMed ID: 37228803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Challenging the engineering design process for the development of facial masks in the constraint of the COVID-19 pandemic. Formentini G; Rodríguez NB; Favi C; Marconi M Procedia CIRP; 2021; 100():660-665. PubMed ID: 34094845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of coronavirus pandemic litters on microfiber pollution-effect of personal protective equipment and disposable face masks. Rathinamoorthy R; Raja Balasaraswathi S Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran); 2022 Aug; ():1-20. PubMed ID: 36035637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A life cycle assessment of reprocessing face masks during the Covid-19 pandemic. van Straten B; Ligtelijn S; Droog L; Putman E; Dankelman J; Weiland NHS; Horeman T Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):17680. PubMed ID: 34480045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The environmental impacts of different mask options for healthcare settings in the UK. Chau C; Paulillo A; Ho J; Bowen R; La Porta A; Lettieri P Sustain Prod Consum; 2022 Sep; 33():271-282. PubMed ID: 35847564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Global face mask pollution: threats to the environment and wildlife, and potential solutions. Wang L; Li S; Ahmad IM; Zhang G; Sun Y; Wang Y; Sun C; Jiang C; Cui P; Li D Sci Total Environ; 2023 Aug; 887():164055. PubMed ID: 37178835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of face masks for the population. Santarsiero A; Giustini M; Quadrini F; D'Alessandro D; Fara GM Ann Ig; 2021; 33(4):347-359. PubMed ID: 33258868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The planetary health effects of COVID-19 in dental care: a life cycle assessment approach. Almutairi W; Saget S; Mc Donnell J; Tarnowski A; Johnstone M; Duane B Br Dent J; 2022 Aug; 233(4):309-316. PubMed ID: 36028696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Facemask Alternatives in Veterinary Medicine in the Context of COVID-19 Shortages. Purens AGM Front Vet Sci; 2020; 7():561. PubMed ID: 33062649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Which strategy for using medical and community masks? A prospective analysis of their environmental impact. Bouchet A; Boucher J; Schutzbach K; Senn N; Genton B; Vernez D BMJ Open; 2021 Sep; 11(9):e049690. PubMed ID: 34489285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]