These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33723791)
21. Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimise the learning curve for robotic rectal resections: a cumulative sum analysis. Odermatt M; Ahmed J; Panteleimonitis S; Khan J; Parvaiz A Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4067-4076. PubMed ID: 28271267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review. Schreuder HW; Wolswijk R; Zweemer RP; Schijven MP; Verheijen RH BJOG; 2012 Jan; 119(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 21981104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Future of robotic surgery in urology. Rassweiler JJ; Autorino R; Klein J; Mottrie A; Goezen AS; Stolzenburg JU; Rha KH; Schurr M; Kaouk J; Patel V; Dasgupta P; Liatsikos E BJU Int; 2017 Dec; 120(6):822-841. PubMed ID: 28319324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Developing an intelligent tutoring system for robotic-assisted surgery instruction. Julian D; Smith R Int J Med Robot; 2019 Dec; 15(6):e2037. PubMed ID: 31509636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Video-Based Coaching: An Efficient Learning and Teaching Modality for Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology Training Program. Coppola V; Autorino G; Cerulo M; Conte FD; Ricci E; Borgogni R; Cardone R; Escolino M; Esposito C J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 May; 31(5):594-597. PubMed ID: 33902332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. How expert surgeons review robotic videos: A grounded theory study. Soliman MM; Soliman MK Am J Surg; 2023 Nov; 226(5):709-716. PubMed ID: 37558519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Exploring and adjusting for potential learning effects in ROLARR: a randomised controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer resection. Corrigan N; Marshall H; Croft J; Copeland J; Jayne D; Brown J Trials; 2018 Jun; 19(1):339. PubMed ID: 29945673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum. Ballas D; Cesta M; Roulette GD; Rusnak M; Ahmed R J Vis Exp; 2018 May; (135):. PubMed ID: 29863667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development and validation of a tool for non-technical skills evaluation in robotic surgery-the ICARS system. Raison N; Wood T; Brunckhorst O; Abe T; Ross T; Challacombe B; Khan MS; Novara G; Buffi N; Van Der Poel H; McIlhenny C; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5403-5410. PubMed ID: 28634630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robotic Surgical Training at Home: A Low-Fidelity Simulation Method. Cruff J J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(2):379-381. PubMed ID: 32747322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Use of Automated Performance Metrics to Measure Surgeon Performance during Robotic Vesicourethral Anastomosis and Methodical Development of a Training Tutorial. Chen J; Oh PJ; Cheng N; Shah A; Montez J; Jarc A; Guo L; Gill IS; Hung AJ J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):895-902. PubMed ID: 29792882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Objective assessment in residency-based training for transoral robotic surgery. Curry M; Malpani A; Li R; Tantillo T; Jog A; Blanco R; Ha PK; Califano J; Kumar R; Richmon J Laryngoscope; 2012 Oct; 122(10):2184-92. PubMed ID: 22915265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparing the da Vinci si single console and dual console in teaching novice surgeons suturing techniques. Crusco S; Jackson T; Advincula A JSLS; 2014; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 25392618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Safety, efficiency and learning curves in robotic surgery: a human factors analysis. Catchpole K; Perkins C; Bresee C; Solnik MJ; Sherman B; Fritch J; Gross B; Jagannathan S; Hakami-Majd N; Avenido R; Anger JT Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3749-61. PubMed ID: 26675938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Skills in minimally invasive and open surgery show limited transferability to robotic surgery: results from a prospective study. Kowalewski KF; Schmidt MW; Proctor T; Pohl M; Wennberg E; Karadza E; Romero P; Kenngott HG; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1656-1667. PubMed ID: 29435749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Training Skills in Minimally Invasive, Robotic and Open Surgery: Brain Activation as an Opportunity for Learning. Pelizzo G; Cardinali L; Bonanno L; Marino S; Cavaliere C; Aiello M; Bramanti P; Mazzon E; Soddu A; Calcaterra V Eur Surg Res; 2020; 61(1):34-50. PubMed ID: 32585673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Transferability of Virtual Reality, Simulation-Based, Robotic Suturing Skills to a Live Porcine Model in Novice Surgeons: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Vargas MV; Moawad G; Denny K; Happ L; Misa NY; Margulies S; Opoku-Anane J; Abi Khalil E; Marfori C J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):420-425. PubMed ID: 28027975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The development of a robotic gynaecological surgery training curriculum and results of a delphi study. Ismail A; Wood M; Ind T; Gul N; Moss E BMC Med Educ; 2020 Mar; 20(1):66. PubMed ID: 32131812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]