These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33723936)

  • 21. Treatment outcomes after extraction and nonextraction treatment evaluated with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Anthopoulou C; Konstantonis D; Makou M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):717-23. PubMed ID: 25432252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Djeu G; Shelton C; Maganzini A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):292-8; discussion 298. PubMed ID: 16168325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Treatment complexity index for assessing the relationship of treatment duration and outcomes in a graduate orthodontics clinic.
    Vu CQ; Roberts WE; Hartsfield JK; Ofner S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):9.e1-13. PubMed ID: 18174061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Stability of the Results of Orthodontic Treatment and Gingival Health between Hawley and Vacuum-formed Retainers.
    Moslemzadeh SH; Sohrabi A; Rafighi A; Farshidnia S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Apr; 19(4):443-449. PubMed ID: 29728551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of Andrews' Analysis as a Predictor of Ideal Sagittal Maxillary Positioning in Orthognathic Surgery.
    Resnick CM; Kim S; Yorlets RR; Calabrese CE; Peacock ZS; Kaban LB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 76(10):2169-2176. PubMed ID: 29654777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.
    Okunami TR; Kusnoto B; BeGole E; Evans CA; Sadowsky C; Fadavi S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 17208106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Changes in Andrews' fifth key of occlusion (interproximal contacts) before and after orthodontic treatment.
    Murugan SM; Kailasam V; Rao GU; Krithika C; Kirthiga M; Aarthi J; Warrier A
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 Jul; 48(4):86-98. PubMed ID: 39087218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comprehensive clinical evaluation as an outcome assessment for a graduate orthodontics program.
    Pinskaya YB; Hsieh TJ; Roberts WE; Hartsfield JK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Nov; 126(5):533-43. PubMed ID: 15520685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts.
    Costalos PA; Sarraf K; Cangialosi TJ; Efstratiadis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 16286210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of university and private-practice orthodontic treatment outcomes with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Cook DR; Harris EF; Vaden JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):707-12. PubMed ID: 15953896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Outcomes of different Class II treatments : Comparisons using the American Board of Orthodontics Model Grading System.
    Akinci Cansunar H; Uysal T
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):233-41. PubMed ID: 27098642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, dental aesthetic index, peer assessment rating index, and American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Onyeaso CO; Begole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Feb; 131(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 17276867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of computer-aided anteroposterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness.
    Schlosser JB; Preston CB; Lampasso J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15643410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of clinical outcomes of Roth and MBT bracket prescription using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System.
    Jain M; Varghese J; Mascarenhas R; Mogra S; Shetty S; Dhakar N
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2013 Jul; 4(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 24124295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interexaminer and intraexaminer reliabilities of 3-dimensional orthodontic digital setups.
    Fabels LN; Nijkamp PG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 25432262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An assessment of treatment outcome in American Board of Orthodontics cases.
    Tahir E; Sadowsky C; Schneider BJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Mar; 111(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 9082857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effectiveness of the Invisalign appliance in extraction cases using the the ABO model grading system: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Li W; Wang S; Zhang Y
    Int J Clin Exp Med; 2015; 8(5):8276-82. PubMed ID: 26221410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of surgical and non-surgical methods of treating palatally impacted canines. II. Aesthetic outcomes.
    Ling KK; Ho CT; Kravchuk O; Olive RJ
    Aust Orthod J; 2007 May; 23(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 17679529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Treatment outcome differences between pass and fail scores and correlation between cephalometric changes and cast-radiograph evaluation of the American Board of Orthodontics.
    Neoh SP; Komoltri C; Viwattanatipa N
    J Orthod Sci; 2018; 7():22. PubMed ID: 30547018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes using the Objective Grading System (OGS) and the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index.
    Chalabi O; Preston CB; Al-Jewair TS; Tabbaa S
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 26999888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.